可持續(xù)運輸被視為運輸能力,它以促進(jìn)近代和后代的社會和經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展并限制負(fù)面環(huán)境影響的方式,保證個人和貨物的流動性。只要運輸獲得全球支持,以改變和減少其負(fù)面外部影響,運輸就可以幫助應(yīng)對現(xiàn)代挑戰(zhàn),包括影響人類生命和健康的交通事故,空氣和噪聲污染,浪費的時間以及與溫室氣體有關(guān)的氣候變化排放。但是,目前,運輸車輛和基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的發(fā)展往往會對可持續(xù)性構(gòu)成重大威脅。因此,必須權(quán)衡增加流動性的好處與社會,環(huán)境和經(jīng)濟(jì)方面的成本。貫徹可持續(xù)發(fā)展的原則可以在多個方面取得進(jìn)展。每個維度都可以在可衡量的要素中定義,即可持續(xù)運輸系統(tǒng)的目標(biāo)。為了實現(xiàn)環(huán)境的可持續(xù)性,該系統(tǒng)需要最大限度地減少資源消耗,最大化土地利用效率并限制對生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的影響,包括廢物和污染的產(chǎn)生。為了實現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)的可持續(xù)性,要求該系統(tǒng)必須有效地促進(jìn)人員和貨物的流動,促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展,并且不會造成社會的經(jīng)濟(jì)脆弱性。為了獲得社會可持續(xù)性,該系統(tǒng)以與安全和人類健康相一致的方式滿足所有個人的訪問需求,并促進(jìn)社會互動和公平。此外,可持續(xù)交通要求在所有這三個維度上發(fā)展可持續(xù)交通行為。為了向決策者提供有效和完整的概念框架,以全面,全面地評估運輸,需要一個框架,其中包括可持續(xù)發(fā)展... 

【文章來源】：中國科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué)安徽省 211工程院校 985工程院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：155 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：博士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgements
1 Introduction
    1.1. Overview
    1.2. Motivation
    1.3. Problem and objectives
    1.4. Outline of the dissertation
2 Mathematical context
    2.1. DEA methodology
    2.2. Current DEA models incorporating undesirable factors
        2.2.1. Directional distance function and its characteristics
        2.2.2. Model of Hwang et al. and its characteristics
        2.2.3. Model of Chen and Delmas and its characteristics
3 Literature review on transport sustainability assessment
    3.1. Sustainability dimensions of transport
    3.2. Transport sustainability assessment
        3.2.1. Economic and environmental sustainability
        3.2.2. Social sustainability
4 Social sustainability assessment approach to inland transportation system
    4.1. Introduction
    4.2. Social sustainability performance measurement
    4.3. Methodology
        4.3.1. DEA models without explicit input
        4.3.2. Shannon-DEA approach
        4.3.3. Malmquist-Luenberger index
    4.4. Case study of road transport in the EU
    4.5. Empirical results
        4.5.1. Social sustainability performance results
        4.5.2. Malmquist-Luenberger index results
    4.6. Discussion and conclusion
5 Triple bottom line-based sustainability assessment approach to inland transportationsystem
    5.1. Introduction
    5.2. Methodology
        5.2.1. Decomposition of the DEA model of Chen and Delmas
        5.2.2. Parallel system
        5.2.3. Parallel system sharing resources
    5.3. Case study of inland transport in China
        5.3.1. Conceptual framework and variable description
        5.3.2. Statistical characteristics of variables
    5.4. Empirical results and discussion
        5.4.1. Triple bottom line-based sustainability results
        5.4.2. Comparison between 11th and 12th five-year plans
        5.4.3. Comparison between Eastern, Central, and Western zones
        5.4.4. Network inefficiency model vs.independent inefficiency model
    5.5. Conclusion and policy implications
6 Concluding Remarks
    6.1. Thesis summary
    6.2. Theoretical contributions
    6.3. Empirical contributions
    6.4. Limitations and future research
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
References



本文編號：3351170