本文選題：公平敏感性 + 公平行為��； 參考：《天津師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文的研究目的主要是探討高中生公平敏感性、家庭教養(yǎng)方式和公平行為三者的主要特點(diǎn),并對(duì)三者之間的關(guān)系做進(jìn)一步的探討。有關(guān)公平敏感性的研究在國內(nèi)并不多見,已有的研究大多遵循國外的研究思路集中在組織行為學(xué)領(lǐng)域,探索高中生這個(gè)群體的公平敏感性的研究少之又少。本文選取了山東臨沂某高中三個(gè)年級(jí)的學(xué)生共656人為被試,采用《家庭教養(yǎng)方式量表》、《公正敏感性量表》以及簡(jiǎn)化版最后通牒游戲?qū)θ叩年P(guān)系做了初步的探討得出結(jié)論如下:①父母彼此之間的教養(yǎng)方式是有顯著差異的,母親比父親更容易表現(xiàn)出情感溫暖和過度保護(hù)。所有教養(yǎng)方式維度均受父親文化程度的影響。父親的學(xué)歷越高,其情感維度的分?jǐn)?shù)越高。②高中生公平敏感性的差異主要體現(xiàn)在性別、是否獨(dú)生子女跟年級(jí)三個(gè)方面。同時(shí)通過數(shù)據(jù)分析發(fā)現(xiàn),父母的文化程度對(duì)于學(xué)生公平敏感性的影響并沒有預(yù)想的那么大,僅在父親教養(yǎng)方式中拒絕維度上的犯過者敏感性有顯著性差異。③家庭教養(yǎng)方式各維度對(duì)公平敏感性的各維度有一定程度的預(yù)測(cè)作用。父母教養(yǎng)方式的拒絕維度與受害者敏感性呈顯著正相關(guān),與犯過者敏感性呈顯著負(fù)相關(guān);父母的情感維度與犯過者敏感性、得益者敏感性呈顯著正相關(guān);父母的過度保護(hù)維度與受害者敏感性與觀察者敏感性呈顯著正相關(guān),母親的過度保護(hù)維度與犯過者敏感性呈顯著負(fù)相關(guān)。④四種不同公平類型的被試中,大公無私型是更愿意犧牲自我利益以完成公平?jīng)Q策的人;自私自利型的被試則不關(guān)注分配原則與分配動(dòng)機(jī),更關(guān)注分配結(jié)果;公平敏感型被試在做決策時(shí)更多地考慮行為背后的意圖;自私自利型的被試則無公平標(biāo)準(zhǔn),他們既不計(jì)較自己的所得,也不計(jì)較自己的損失。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this study is to explore the main characteristics of high school students' fairness sensitivity, family rearing style and fair behavior, and to further explore the relationship between them. The research on fairness sensitivity is rare in our country. Most of the existing researches focus on the field of organizational behavior, and there are few researches on the fair sensitivity of high school students. This paper selects 656 students from three grades of a high school in Linyi, Shandong Province, as subjects. By using the Family rearing style scale, the Justice sensitivity scale and the simplified ultimatum game, this paper makes a preliminary study on the relationship among them. The conclusion is as follows: 1 there are significant differences in parenting styles between parents. Mothers are more likely than fathers to show emotional warmth and overprotection. All the dimensions of upbringing style were influenced by the father's education level. The higher the academic background of the father, the higher the score of emotional dimension .2 the difference of the fairness sensitivity of senior high school students is mainly reflected in gender, whether the only child and grade three aspects. At the same time, through the analysis of data, we found that the influence of parents' education level on students' fairness sensitivity is not as great as expected. There were significant differences in the sensitivity of offenders only in the refusal dimension of the father's upbringing style. 3 each dimension of the family rearing style had a certain degree of predictive effect on the dimensions of fairness sensitivity. There was a significant positive correlation between parental rearing style rejection dimension and victim sensitivity, and a significant negative correlation between parental emotional dimension and offender sensitivity, and a significant positive correlation between parental emotional dimension and offender sensitivity. The parental overprotection dimension was positively correlated with the sensitivity of the victim and the sensitivity of the observer, while the mother's dimension of overprotection was negatively correlated with the sensitivity of the offender. The selfless type is the person who is more willing to sacrifice their own interests in order to complete the fair decision, while the self-interested subjects do not pay attention to the distribution principle and motivation, and pay more attention to the distribution results. The fair sensitive subjects consider the intention behind the behavior more when they make the decision, while the selfishness type subjects have no fair standard, they neither consider their own income nor their own loss.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B844.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條

1 蓋乾;;企業(yè)員工的公平敏感性及其與家庭教養(yǎng)方式的關(guān)系[J];青年與社會(huì);2013年11期

2 劉米娜;;家庭教養(yǎng)方式、自尊與青少年幸福感研究[J];南京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年03期

3 李杰;;公正敏感性量表的信效度檢驗(yàn)[J];青春歲月;2013年09期

4 謝雪賢;劉毅;吳偉炯;;公正敏感性的研究現(xiàn)狀與展望[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2012年02期

5 鄒玉龍;;家庭教養(yǎng)方式研究綜述[J];赤峰學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(科學(xué)教育版);2011年01期

6 周浩;龍立榮;;公平感社會(huì)比較的參照對(duì)象選擇研究述評(píng)[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2010年06期

7 呂曉俊;;社會(huì)公平感形成的心理機(jī)制研究述評(píng)[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

8 蔣獎(jiǎng);魯崢嶸;蔣傼菁;許燕;;簡(jiǎn)式父母教養(yǎng)方式問卷中文版的初步修訂[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2010年01期

9 李強(qiáng);;公平敏感性視角下組織公平感與員工績效的關(guān)系研究[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

10 樊蕾;;公平敏感性與人格特質(zhì)關(guān)系的研究評(píng)述[J];山西煤炭管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

中國碩士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前1條

1 胡俏;中學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)倦怠結(jié)構(gòu)研究[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2065986