本文選題：城鄉(xiāng)教育共生 + 農(nóng)村教育��； 參考：《教育學(xué)術(shù)月刊》2017年03期

【摘要】：反思長期以來關(guān)于我國"城鄉(xiāng)教育"問題的認(rèn)識論與價值論局限,共生哲學(xué)、共生價值觀成為新時期的必要選擇,根本就是要從哲學(xué)或方法論意義上建構(gòu)起一種中國城鄉(xiāng)教育共生觀,即強調(diào)鄉(xiāng)村教育與城鄉(xiāng)教育作為具有不同"性格"的教育類型之間"異質(zhì)共存"、互哺發(fā)展,或"各美其美、美人之美、美美與共"的關(guān)系構(gòu)建。城鄉(xiāng)教育共生實踐的可能性關(guān)鍵在于:確立平等正義·承認(rèn)正義的哲學(xué)前提,重建鄉(xiāng)村教育,拾掘與建構(gòu)鄉(xiāng)土知識,正視"逆城市化"現(xiàn)象與"新鄉(xiāng)土主義"思潮及可能出現(xiàn)的"教育互轉(zhuǎn)"。
[Abstract]:Reflecting on the limitations of epistemology and axiology on the issue of "urban and rural education" in China for a long time, symbiotic philosophy and symbiotic values have become the necessary choice in the new era. It is essential to construct a symbiosis view of Chinese urban and rural education from a philosophical or methodological point of view, that is, to emphasize the "heterogeneous coexistence" between rural education and urban and rural education as a type of education with different "personalities", to feed each other's development, or "to be beautiful and beautiful." Beauty of beauty, beauty and beauty in common with "the relationship between the construction." The key to the practice of urban and rural education symbiosis lies in: establishing the philosophical premise of equal justice and acknowledging justice, rebuilding rural education, picking up and constructing local knowledge. Facing up to the phenomenon of "anti-urbanization", the trend of thought of "new nativism" and the possible "educational transformation".
【作者單位】： 北京師范大學(xué)教育學(xué)部;
【基金】：廣西教育科學(xué)“十三五”規(guī)劃2016年度廣西教育科學(xué)重點研究基地重大課題“民族地區(qū)鄉(xiāng)村教師教學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)能力提升研究”(項目編號:2016JD207)
【分類號】：G521

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李欣;農(nóng)村教育投資系統(tǒng)改革芻議[J];貴州財經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年05期

2 孟凡杰;農(nóng)村教育該走一條什么樣的路[J];黑龍江教育;2002年09期

3 文U，

本文編號：2002877