本文選題：留守兒童 + 生命意義感��； 參考：《四川師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)社會(huì)的不斷轉(zhuǎn)型,出現(xiàn)了許多農(nóng)村青年外出打工的現(xiàn)象,造成大量農(nóng)村孩子失去了父母的陪伴。全國(guó)婦聯(lián)關(guān)于留守兒童的調(diào)查報(bào)告中顯示2012年我國(guó)的留守兒童高達(dá)6100萬(wàn)人,這一龐大弱勢(shì)群體的教育及心理健康問(wèn)題受到廣大人民群眾的關(guān)注。已有學(xué)者大量報(bào)告了因?yàn)榱羰貎和幵谔厥獾沫h(huán)境及年齡階段中,出現(xiàn)了一系列的心理及行為問(wèn)題。在2006年以后的十年間留守兒童發(fā)生傷亡事件高達(dá)239件,僅2010年以后的五年間就發(fā)生206起。調(diào)查留守兒童的生命意義感,對(duì)其健康成長(zhǎng)意義重大。本研究的留守兒童是指“兒童父母兩人或一人離開(kāi)家鄉(xiāng)出去工作,兒童與父母分離時(shí)間高達(dá)六個(gè)月,年齡小于17周歲�！绷炕芯恐械恼{(diào)查對(duì)象來(lái)自四川省富順縣與安徽省渦陽(yáng)縣部分鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)學(xué)校,被試就讀于3-8年級(jí),年齡大多分布在8-15歲之間。采用生命意義感量表、家庭復(fù)原力問(wèn)卷、心理安全感量表對(duì)被試進(jìn)行施測(cè)。本研究的目的是了解留守兒童的生命意義感、心理安全感的現(xiàn)狀,以及探討心理安全感、家庭復(fù)原力與生命意義感的關(guān)系。在量化研究基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)8名留守學(xué)生、4名老師、2名校長(zhǎng)進(jìn)行關(guān)于留守兒童生命意義感的半結(jié)構(gòu)化訪談。通過(guò)SPSS19.0、AMOS17.0對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析。分析結(jié)果表明:1.留守兒童生命意義感水平較低,尤其是對(duì)生命的熱誠(chéng)、生活目標(biāo)和積極性三個(gè)維度。2.兒童留守與否對(duì)生命意義感總分及其各維度影響顯著。3.留守兒童的心理安全感與生命意義感,家庭復(fù)原力與生命意義感,心理安全感和家庭復(fù)原力均呈現(xiàn)顯著正相關(guān)。4.心理安全感可以直接對(duì)生命意義感產(chǎn)生影響,也可以通過(guò)家庭復(fù)原力間接對(duì)生命意義感產(chǎn)生影響。家庭復(fù)原力在心理安全感和生命意義感之間起著部分中介作用,其模型的解釋率為23.3%。5.留守兒童的性別、首留年齡段、留守時(shí)間長(zhǎng)短對(duì)生命意義感的影響較小,但在是否獨(dú)生、父母外出類(lèi)型、聯(lián)系頻率、撫養(yǎng)者文化程度方面存在顯著差異,其中與父親在家的留守兒童生命意義感得分最低。經(jīng)常與父母聯(lián)系的留守兒童,其生命意義感水平越高。生命意義感水平越高的留守兒童,其父母和撫養(yǎng)者受教育水平越高。6.留守兒童的人際安全感能夠顯著預(yù)測(cè)生命意義感,留守兒童家庭信念在人際安全感和生命意義感之間起到部分中介作用。7.非留守兒童的人際安全感能夠顯著預(yù)測(cè)生命意義感,非留守兒童的親密和諧、合作協(xié)調(diào)在人際安全感和生命意義感之間部分中介作用顯著。
[Abstract]:With the continuous transformation of our society, many rural youth go out to work, resulting in a large number of rural children lost their parents accompanied. According to the survey report of the All-China Women's Federation on left-behind children, the number of left-behind children in China reached 61 million in 2012. The education and mental health problems of this huge vulnerable group have attracted the attention of the broad masses of the people. Some scholars have reported a series of psychological and behavioral problems due to the special environment and age of left-behind children. There were 239 casualties among children left behind in the decade after 2006, and 206 in the five years after 2010 alone. Investigating the sense of life significance of left-behind children is of great significance to their healthy growth. Children left behind in this study refer to "two or one of the parents left home to work, children separated from their parents for up to six months, under the age of 17 years old." The subjects in the quantitative study were selected from some township schools in Fushun County of Sichuan Province and part of Township Schools in Wubang County of Anhui Province. The subjects studied in grades 3-8 were mostly between 8-15 years old. Life sense scale, family resilience questionnaire and psychological security scale were used to test the subjects. The purpose of this study was to understand the sense of life meaning and the present situation of psychological security of left-behind children, and to explore the relationship between psychological security, family resilience and sense of meaning of life. On the basis of quantitative study, a semi-structured interview was conducted with 8 left-behind students and 4 teachers and 2 principals on the sense of life significance of left-behind children. The data were analyzed by SPSS 19.0 Amos 17.0. The result of analysis shows that 1: 1. The level of life sense of left-behind children is low, especially the enthusiasm for life, life goal and enthusiasm. 2. Children left behind or not have a significant impact on the total score of life sense and its dimensions. 3. Psychological security and life sense of left-behind children, family resilience and sense of life meaning, psychological security and family resilience showed significant positive correlation. 4. The sense of psychological security can directly affect the sense of meaning of life, or indirectly affect the sense of meaning of life through family resilience. Family resilience plays an intermediary role between psychological security and sense of meaning of life, and the explanation rate of the model is 23.3. 5. The sex, age of first stay, length of stay time had little influence on the sense of life meaning, but there were significant differences in whether the only child, the type of parents going out, the frequency of contact, and the education level of the foster. Among them, children who stayed at home with their father had the lowest sense of life significance. The level of sense of life of left-behind children who often contact their parents is higher. The higher the level of sense of life, the higher the education level of parents and caregivers. The interpersonal security of left-behind children can significantly predict the sense of meaning of life, and the family beliefs of left-behind children play a part of intermediary role between interpersonal security and sense of meaning of life. The interpersonal security of non-left-behind children can significantly predict the sense of meaning of life, the intimacy and harmony of non-left-behind children, and cooperation and coordination play an important role in the intermediary between interpersonal security and sense of meaning of life.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B844.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李靜;劉暢;侯福妍;李揚(yáng);;我國(guó)留守兒童發(fā)展研究綜述[J];高校社科動(dòng)態(tài);2017年01期

2 曹羽鶴;王堅(jiān);;安全感研究述評(píng)與展望[J];中國(guó)健康心理學(xué)雜志;2016年12期

3 馮縵;劉利;劉娟;曹瑞霞;劉博;高晨陽(yáng);;集體心理咨詢提升大學(xué)生生命意義感的干預(yù)研究[J];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2016年10期

4 張高華;;留守兒童心理研究文獻(xiàn)綜述[J];山東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年05期

5 陳啟剛;戚嵩;;安徽省農(nóng)村留守兒童心理健康與安全保護(hù)狀況調(diào)研報(bào)告[J];合肥師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年05期

6 劉佑生;楊元花;;國(guó)內(nèi)近十年關(guān)于安全感的研究述評(píng)[J];湘潮(下半月);2016年06期

7 姜玉;;我國(guó)留守兒童狀況研究[J];人口與計(jì)劃生育;2016年06期

8 趙西西;孫霞;王雪芳;王晶晶;蘆靜;牛少瓊;;家庭復(fù)原力的研究進(jìn)展及其對(duì)危機(jī)家庭的護(hù)理啟示[J];中華護(hù)理雜志;2015年11期

9 鐘乃良;;仫佬族高中生生命意義感的特點(diǎn)和來(lái)源[J];遵義師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

10 廖傳景;胡瑜;張進(jìn)輔;;留守兒童安全感量表編制及常模建構(gòu)[J];西南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 吳少杰;;《中國(guó)流動(dòng)人口發(fā)展報(bào)告2016》發(fā)布[N];中國(guó)人口報(bào);2016年

2 蔣建科;楊潔;王曉曄;;誰(shuí)為留守兒童撐起一片天？[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2015年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 同雪莉;留守兒童抗逆力生成研究[D];南京大學(xué);2016年

2 朱眉華;困境與調(diào)適：鄉(xiāng)城流動(dòng)家庭的抗逆力研究[D];上海大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 許冰琪;困境與調(diào)適：失獨(dú)家庭抗逆力研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2016年

2 祝嘉慧;城市貧困家庭抗逆力測(cè)量指標(biāo)的修訂與檢驗(yàn)[D];華東理工大學(xué);2015年

3 秦紹杰;包容型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)、心理安全感與員工建言行為間關(guān)系研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

4 吳丹;有留守經(jīng)歷大學(xué)生心理安全感和社交焦慮的相關(guān)研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2015年

5 倪嘯e，

本文編號(hào)：1964747