本文關(guān)鍵詞： 網(wǎng)上課程 評(píng)閱人推薦 MOOC 同伴互評(píng)　出處：《昆明理工大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：日漸興起的網(wǎng)上課程為世界各地的學(xué)習(xí)者們進(jìn)行網(wǎng)上學(xué)習(xí)提供了便利,其中大規(guī)模網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開課(Massive Open Online Course,簡(jiǎn)稱MOOC)在眾多網(wǎng)上課程中嶄露頭角。為解決MOOC課程中學(xué)習(xí)者的作業(yè)太多而導(dǎo)致授課老師無(wú)法在限定時(shí)間內(nèi)批改的問(wèn)題,MOOC的課程設(shè)計(jì)者們?cè)诰W(wǎng)上課程中增添了同伴互評(píng)這一環(huán)節(jié)。MOOC中的同伴互評(píng)在減輕課程老師的負(fù)擔(dān),豐富學(xué)習(xí)者的知識(shí)和開闊學(xué)習(xí)者的視野以及提高學(xué)習(xí)者參與網(wǎng)上課程的積極性等方面發(fā)揮了重要作用。但是,據(jù)眾多MOOC學(xué)習(xí)者反應(yīng),現(xiàn)行MOOC的同伴互評(píng)系統(tǒng)在為學(xué)習(xí)者作業(yè)分配評(píng)閱人這一問(wèn)題上還存在著不足,具體表現(xiàn)為同伴互評(píng)過(guò)程中作業(yè)評(píng)閱語(yǔ)言粗魯和作業(yè)得分過(guò)高或過(guò)低等一系列問(wèn)題的存在。為此：本研究提出從評(píng)閱人的評(píng)閱意愿、評(píng)閱人的評(píng)閱能力和評(píng)閱人與作業(yè)的相關(guān)度三個(gè)維度出發(fā)整合學(xué)習(xí)者信息和學(xué)習(xí)者的作業(yè)信息,并在一定的約束條件下對(duì)候選評(píng)閱人和其它學(xué)習(xí)者的作業(yè)進(jìn)行匹配,然后再根據(jù)匹配結(jié)果為每一份學(xué)習(xí)者的作業(yè)推薦評(píng)閱人。為檢測(cè)同伴互評(píng)評(píng)閱人推薦方法和推薦模型的有效性,中國(guó)某一大學(xué)的46名管理信息系統(tǒng)專業(yè)的學(xué)生參與了我們的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究。實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果表明：使用同伴互評(píng)評(píng)閱人推薦方法的實(shí)驗(yàn)組學(xué)生比使用現(xiàn)行方法分配評(píng)閱人的對(duì)照組學(xué)生在作業(yè)最終評(píng)分、作業(yè)評(píng)語(yǔ)、評(píng)閱人的態(tài)度以及與老師評(píng)閱的結(jié)果相比同伴給出的評(píng)閱結(jié)果是否滿意等幾個(gè)方面均具有更高的滿意度。由此證明本研究提出的同伴互評(píng)評(píng)閱人推薦系統(tǒng)在提高學(xué)習(xí)者同伴互評(píng)的滿意度方面發(fā)揮著顯著作用。
[Abstract]:The rising number of online courses has facilitated online learning for learners around the world. Among them, massive Open Online course (MOOCfor short) has emerged in many online courses. In order to solve the problem of too much homework for learners in MOOC course, the teacher can not correct it in a limited time. Participants added peer peer reviews to online courses. Peer peer reviews in MOOC reduced the burden on course teachers. Enriching learners' knowledge, broadening their horizons and promoting learners' enthusiasm to participate in online courses have played an important role. However, according to the response of many MOOC learners, The current peer evaluation system of MOOC still has some shortcomings in assigning reviewers to learners' assignments. It is manifested in a series of problems, such as the rude language of homework review and the high or low score of homework in the process of peer evaluation. The ability of the reviewer and the relevance between the reviewer and the assignment are three dimensions to integrate the learner information with the learner's homework information and to match the candidate's and other learners' homework under certain constraints. Then, according to the matching results, the reviewers for each learner's assignment are recommended. In order to test the validity of peer peer review reviewers' recommendation method and recommendation model, A total of 46 students majoring in management information systems at a university in China participated in our experimental study. The experimental results show that the experimental group with peer peer review recommendation method is more likely to use the current method than the current method. The students in the control group scored at the end of the assignment. Homework comments, The attitude of the evaluator and the satisfaction of the peer compared with the result of the teacher review have higher satisfaction. It is proved that the peer review recommendation system proposed in this study can improve the performance of the peer review system. The satisfaction of peer evaluation plays a significant role.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：昆明理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：G434
，

本文編號(hào)：1525253