本文關鍵詞：受欺負初中生學校適應性的彈性發(fā)展及干預　出處：《山西醫(yī)科大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 初中生 受欺負 學校適應性 彈性

【摘要】：目的:調(diào)查當前在校初中生的受欺負情況,了解受欺負初中生的學校適應性現(xiàn)狀,探討父母教養(yǎng)方式、自尊水平對受欺負初中生學校適應性彈性發(fā)展的影響;研究自尊團體心理輔導對受欺負初中生學校適應性及自尊水平的作用。對象:調(diào)查研究采取分層整群隨機抽樣法,選取某市四所初中、32個班的初中生為研究對象,以班級為單位進行團體施測。干預研究從調(diào)查研究的受欺負初中生學校適應性非彈性組中隨機抽取80名同學為研究對象,分為干預組和對照組。方法:(1)調(diào)查研究:采用問卷調(diào)查法,將《一般情況調(diào)查表》、《初中生學校適應問卷》、《父母教養(yǎng)方式量表》、《Olweu兒童欺負問卷(初中版)》受欺負分量表、《羅森伯格自尊量表》作為本調(diào)查研究的工具。研究內(nèi)容包括:初中生受欺負行為的基本特點、受欺負初中生的學校適應性及相關因素的特點、受欺負初中生學校適應性的彈性發(fā)展研究。(2)干預研究:根據(jù)調(diào)查研究結果設計符合受欺負初中生心理需求的自尊團體輔導方案,對干預組進行為期兩個月共8次的自尊團體心理輔導課程,每周一次,每次約90分鐘。對照組學生不參加該團體心理輔導課程。結果:1、調(diào)查研究結果:(1)所調(diào)查的學生群體中受欺負的有832人,占所調(diào)查的學生比例為50.03%。不同性別和年級學生的受欺負情況存在顯著差異(性別:χ~2=66.875,p0.001;年級:χ~2=21.748,p0.001)。不同性別和年級學生的受欺負類型存在顯著差異(p0.05)。(2)受欺負初中生的常規(guī)適應在性別上有顯著差異(p0.05);除同伴關系維度外,學校適應總分及其他維度在年級上有顯著差異(p0.05);除師生關系和常規(guī)適應外,學校適應總分及其他維度在家庭經(jīng)濟情況上有差異(p0.05)。(3)非受欺負初中生在學校適應性總量表及各個分量表上的得分均顯著高于受欺負初中生(p0.01);除了父親過度保護因子以外,受欺負初中生與非受欺負初中生的父母教養(yǎng)方式存在顯著差異(p0.001);非受欺負初中生在自尊量表上的得分顯著高于受欺負初中生(t=4.987,p0.001)。(4)除父親過度保護因子以外,彈性發(fā)展組與非彈性組的父母教養(yǎng)方式存在顯著差異(p0.05);彈性發(fā)展組在自尊量表上的得分顯著高于非彈性發(fā)展組(t=-7.994,p0.001)。(5)自尊在父親拒絕、情感溫暖、母親情感溫暖對學校適應的影響中起到部分中介作用,在母親過度保護對學校適應的影響中起到完全中介作用。2、干預研究結果:(1)自尊的組內(nèi)比較,干預組前后測存在顯著差異(t=-7.185,p0.001),對照組無顯著差異(p0.05);組間比較,干預組自尊量表上得分的增值顯著高于對照組(t=4.335,p0.001)。(2)學校適應性的組內(nèi)比較,干預組學校適應總量表(t=-3.516,p0.01)、學校態(tài)度與情感(t=-2.494,p0.05)和同伴關系(t=-4.221,p0.001)各維度前后測存在顯著差異,對照組無顯著差異(p0.05);組間比較,干預組學校適應總量表(t=2.895,p0.01)及學校態(tài)度與情感(t=2.203,p0.05)和同伴關系(t=3.585,p0.01)各維度上得分的增值顯著高于對照組,其他維度無顯著差異(p0.05)。研究結論:(1)初中生受欺負狀況具有普遍性,受欺負發(fā)生率和受欺負類型存在性別和年級差異。(2)父母教養(yǎng)方式和自尊是影響受欺負初中生學校適應彈性發(fā)展的重要因素,且父母教養(yǎng)方式、自尊、學校適應彈性水平三者之間存在顯著相關。(3)自尊在父親拒絕、父親情感溫暖、母親情感溫暖對學校適應的影響中起到部分中介作用,在母親過度保護對學校適應的影響中起到完全中介作用。(4)本研究設計的自尊團體輔導可以顯著改善受欺負初中生的自尊水平,并通過自尊水平的改善提高其學校適應,但該團體輔導對提高學業(yè)適應、師生關系和常規(guī)適應作用不顯著。
[Abstract]:Objective: To investigate the current junior middle school students being bullied, understand bullied school adaptability of the junior middle school students, to explore the parenting style, self-esteem level of victimization of junior middle school students adaptability flexible development; Study on self-esteem of group counseling on bullying school adaptability and self-esteem. Research object: take stratified random sampling method, selected from four junior high school, 32 classes of junior high school students as the research object, the questionnaire to the class as a unit. The intervention study from the investigation of junior high school students being bullied school adaptability inelastic group were randomly selected 80 students as the research object, divided into intervention group and control group. Methods: (1) research: using the method of questionnaire survey, the general situation questionnaire < >, < school adaptation questionnaire >, < EMBU > as the research. The research contents include: the basic characteristics of bullying behavior of junior middle school students, the characteristics of school bullying adaptability and related factors, research and development of elastic bullied school adaptability. (2) intervention study: according to the investigation and research the results meet the design of self-esteem group counseling program bully junior high school students' psychological needs, curriculum self-esteem group counseling for two months a total of 8 times in the intervention group, every week, every 90 minutes. The control group students do not participate in the group counseling courses. Results: 1. The research results: (1) the survey of students being bullied have 832 people, accounting for the proportion of students for the 50.03%. of different gender and grade student victimization are significant difference (gender: X ~2=66.875, p0.001 x ~2=21.748, p0.00 grade; 1). There were significant differences in different gender and grade students' bullying type (P0.05). (2) victimization of junior high school students to adapt to the conventional significant differences in gender (P0.05); in addition to peer relation, school adjustment score and other dimensions have significant difference in grade (P0.05); in addition to the relationship between teachers and students and the conventional adjustment, school adjustment score and other dimensions there are differences in the family economic situation (P0.05). (3) non victimization of junior high school students in school adaptability of total scale and each subscale scores were significantly higher than junior high school students being bullied (P0.01); in addition to father's over protection factor, there are significant differences by junior high school students and non bullying victimization of junior high school students' parental rearing pattern (p0.001); non victimization of junior high school students in self-esteem scores were significantly higher than that of victimization of junior high school students (t=4.987, p0.001). (4) in addition to father's over protection factor, elastic and non Development Group There are significant differences in elastic group parenting style (P0.05); flexible development group on the self-esteem scale score was significantly higher than that of non elastic development group (t=-7.994, p0.001). (5) self-esteem in emotional warmth, father refused to play the part of the intermediary role influence of mother's emotional warmth on school adjustment, the mother's excessive the protection effect on school adaptation plays a completely mediating role.2, intervention study results: (1) high self-esteem group, the intervention group before and after the test there are significant differences (t=-7.185, p0.001), the control group had no significant difference (P0.05); comparison between groups, the intervention group added self-esteem scale was significantly higher than that of the control group (t=4.335, p0.001). (2) comparison of school adaptation within the group, the intervention group to total scale (t=-3.516, P0.01), the school attitude and emotion (t=-2.494, P0.05) and peer relationship (t= -4.221, p0.001) dimensions there are significant differences before and after the test, the control group Significant differences (P0.05); comparison between groups, the intervention group to total scale (t=2.895, P0.01) and the school attitude and emotion (t=2.203, P0.05) and peer relationship (t=3.585, P0.01) the value of each dimension scores significantly higher than the control group, no significant difference in other dimensions (P0.05). Conclusions: (1 junior middle school students) bullying situation is universal, the incidence of bullying and victimization are different gender and grade types. (2) parenting style and self-esteem are affected by bullying school to adapt to the important factors of the development of flexible, self-esteem and parental rearing style, there is a significant correlation between the school level three (flexible. 3) self-esteem in the father refused, father's emotional warmth, play the part of the intermediary role influence of mother's emotional warmth on school adjustment, in the mother's over protection effect on school adaptation plays a completely mediating role. (4) the design of self esteem group Physical education can significantly improve the self-esteem level of the bullied junior middle school students, and improve their school adjustment through the improvement of self-esteem level. However, the group counseling has no significant effect on improving academic adaptation, teacher-student relationship and routine adaptation.

【學位授予單位】：山西醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B844.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 楊繼宇;謝宇;瞿華禮;劉宗勝;王毓杰;;中國學生欺負相關行為報告率的Meta分析[J];中國健康心理學雜志;2016年11期

2 劉慶;王苗苗;相青;宋玉萍;;青少年心理韌性與父母教養(yǎng)方式的關系[J];中國健康心理學雜志;2016年07期

3 盧富榮;王俠;李杜芳;王耘;;小學生學校適應的發(fā)展特點及其與父母教養(yǎng)方式關系的研究[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2015年05期

4 楊晶;余俊宣;寇_g;傅鑫媛;;干預初中生的同伴關系以促進其親社會行為[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2015年02期

5 張效芳;杜秀芳;;父母教養(yǎng)行為對初中生學校適應的影響:心理資本的中介作用[J];中國特殊教育;2014年01期

6 李孟澤;王小新;;流動兒童自尊社會支持心理彈性的相關性分析[J];中國學校衛(wèi)生;2013年08期

7 朱丹;王國鋒;劉軍;彭小虎;;流動兒童同伴關系的彈性發(fā)展特點研究[J];中國臨床心理學雜志;2013年04期

8 劉麗瓊;朱海研;熊曉;王雷萍;劉麗淑;閆巖;葉陽陽;;初中生欺負行為及其與自尊關系分析[J];中國學校衛(wèi)生;2013年07期

9 張向葵;鄧小平;;自尊在班級環(huán)境與中小學生學校適應中的中介作用[J];大慶師范學院學報;2013年04期

10 劉俊升;趙燕;;童年中期受欺負與問題行為之關系:一項兩年縱向研究[J];心理科學;2013年03期

相關會議論文 前2條

1 張彩;張平平;任萍;張興慧;王耘;;家庭社會經(jīng)濟地位處境不利青少年校園受欺負潛在類別及其與學校適應的關系[A];中國心理學會發(fā)展心理專業(yè)委員會第十三屆學術年會摘要集[C];2015年

2 章小雷;張靜;;慢性病兒童家庭環(huán)境、兒童個性、應對方式與心理彈性關系的模型構建[A];中華醫(yī)學會第十七次全國兒科學術大會論文匯編（上冊）[C];2012年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 馮建榮;高中生羞怯、同伴依戀與學校適應的關系[D];山東師范大學;2016年

2 劉冕;中職生的外顯自尊、內(nèi)隱自尊及其干預研究[D];魯東大學;2015年

3 張佳麗;住校初中生父母教養(yǎng)方式、心理韌性與學校適應的關系[D];西南大學;2015年

4 張瑩;家庭環(huán)境中父母教養(yǎng)方式和家庭功能對高中生心理韌性的影響研究[D];吉林大學;2012年

5 宋曉燕;流動兒童家庭環(huán)境、自尊與學校適應的關系研究[D];鄭州大學;2012年

6 李盛林;初中留守兒童自我概念與學校適應的關系研究[D];江西師范大學;2009年

7 崔娜;初中生學校適應與自我概念的相關研究[D];西南大學;2008年

8 汪清華;中小學生家庭環(huán)境與學校適應的關系研究[D];南京師范大學;2007年

9 黃玉梅;父母教養(yǎng)方式與城鄉(xiāng)青少年學校適應的關系比較[D];山東師范大學;2006年

10 謝丹;進城務工農(nóng)民子女自尊發(fā)展的心理彈性研究[D];湖南師范大學;2006年

，

本文編號：1432196

suoshi