本文關(guān)鍵詞：移動(dòng)學(xué)習(xí)環(huán)境下大學(xué)生英語寫作學(xué)習(xí)行為研究　出處：《上海外國語大學(xué)》2017年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 英語寫作 移動(dòng)學(xué)習(xí) 學(xué)習(xí)行為 學(xué)習(xí)分析 混合學(xué)習(xí)

【摘要】：論文在社會(huì)文化理論視域下,以活動(dòng)理論為分析框架,以“后過程”寫作理論為指導(dǎo)構(gòu)建了移動(dòng)英語寫作混合學(xué)習(xí)平臺(tái),并據(jù)此進(jìn)行2個(gè)月大學(xué)生英語議論文寫作教學(xué)實(shí)踐,以研究移動(dòng)學(xué)習(xí)環(huán)境下大學(xué)生英語寫作學(xué)習(xí)行為,主要回答三個(gè)研究問題:一、移動(dòng)學(xué)習(xí)環(huán)境下大學(xué)生英語寫作學(xué)習(xí)行為總體情況如何?有哪些特點(diǎn)?二、這些學(xué)習(xí)行為對學(xué)生英語寫作產(chǎn)生了什么效果?三、這些學(xué)習(xí)行為受到了哪些因素的影響?這些因素是如何影響學(xué)習(xí)行為的?論文研究對象為一所地方師范大學(xué)英語專業(yè)3年級2個(gè)班62位學(xué)生,采用混合研究設(shè)計(jì),從網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)器日志和數(shù)據(jù)庫中通過數(shù)據(jù)挖掘獲得學(xué)生移動(dòng)英語寫作學(xué)習(xí)行為的類型、頻度和特點(diǎn),采用問卷和訪談了解學(xué)生自我感知的寫作技能、語言運(yùn)用和情感因素等方面的進(jìn)步狀況,并與控制班前后測成績進(jìn)行比較,來綜合評估學(xué)生移動(dòng)英語寫作學(xué)習(xí)的學(xué)習(xí)效果。研究結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),學(xué)生在移動(dòng)學(xué)習(xí)環(huán)境下產(chǎn)生了多種英語寫作相關(guān)的學(xué)習(xí)行為,在各時(shí)段分散式地投入了大量時(shí)間進(jìn)行寫作學(xué)習(xí),學(xué)習(xí)場所不限于教室、圖書館和宿舍,擴(kuò)展到了路上和其他非傳統(tǒng)學(xué)習(xí)場所,體現(xiàn)了“隨時(shí)隨地”進(jìn)行移動(dòng)學(xué)習(xí)的優(yōu)勢;大多數(shù)學(xué)生能夠及時(shí)響應(yīng)寫作任務(wù),但有少數(shù)學(xué)生仍然出現(xiàn)拖延現(xiàn)象;從移動(dòng)寫作參與度的聚類分析來看,學(xué)生分為四類:均衡積極型、評價(jià)積極型、均衡消極型和評價(jià)消極型學(xué)生;從發(fā)表后評價(jià)的社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析來看,學(xué)生整體參與度很好,但差異較大,專家學(xué)生在整個(gè)評價(jià)活動(dòng)中表現(xiàn)突出,在社群中獲得了較大的影響力和威望,起到了引領(lǐng)作用,形成了自組織學(xué)習(xí)的英語寫作學(xué)習(xí)新生態(tài)。前后測結(jié)果表明,移動(dòng)英語寫作組的進(jìn)步顯著優(yōu)于控制組。從學(xué)生的反思、問卷與訪談數(shù)據(jù)來看,學(xué)生在移動(dòng)英語寫作學(xué)習(xí)中自我感知寫作技能的進(jìn)步明顯,語言方面也有一些進(jìn)步,并獲得了較為積極的情感體驗(yàn),增進(jìn)了英語寫作自信,降低了寫作焦慮,保證了學(xué)習(xí)的持續(xù)投入和學(xué)習(xí)質(zhì)量,從而一定程度上證明了移動(dòng)英語寫作混合模式的有效性。進(jìn)一步對學(xué)生反思、問卷和訪談的質(zhì)性數(shù)據(jù)的分析表明,學(xué)生對移動(dòng)英語寫作學(xué)習(xí)的效用期望、易用期望和外在規(guī)范三大因素影響了學(xué)生的移動(dòng)英語寫作學(xué)習(xí)行為,其中前兩者主要源自技術(shù)促學(xué)的作用,而外在規(guī)范則包括課程的強(qiáng)制性學(xué)習(xí)要求、激勵(lì)機(jī)制帶來的內(nèi)在驅(qū)動(dòng)力,以及協(xié)作學(xué)習(xí)和外部壓力產(chǎn)生的遵從行為。這三大因素均通過學(xué)生個(gè)人的個(gè)體特質(zhì)如自我效能感、動(dòng)機(jī)和個(gè)人偏好的中介而發(fā)揮作用�；谘芯堪l(fā)現(xiàn),論文從英語專業(yè)教學(xué)改革、信息技術(shù)促學(xué)背景下的外語教師發(fā)展和我國外語教育技術(shù)促學(xué)機(jī)制的改革等方面提出了參考建議。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of sociocultural theory, the thesis constructs a mixed learning platform for mobile English writing under the guidance of "post-process" writing theory and activity theory as an analytical framework. In order to study the behavior of college students' English writing learning in mobile learning environment, three main research questions are answered: 1) A two-month teaching practice of argumentative English writing for college students is carried out in order to study the behavior of English writing in mobile learning environment. What is the general situation of college students' English writing learning behavior under the mobile learning environment? What are the features? Second, what effect do these learning behaviors have on students' English writing? Third, what factors affect these learning behaviors? How do these factors affect learning behavior? The research object of this paper is 62 students in 2 classes of English major in a local normal university. The types, frequency and characteristics of students' mobile English writing learning behaviors were obtained by data mining from web server logs and databases. Questionnaire and interviews were used to understand students' self-perceived writing skills. The progress of language use and affective factors was compared with that of the control class in order to evaluate the learning effect of mobile English writing. Students in the mobile learning environment produce a variety of learning behaviors related to English writing. They have invested a lot of time in writing learning in different periods of time, and learning places are not limited to classrooms, libraries and dormitories. Extended to the road and other non-traditional learning sites, reflecting the "anytime anywhere" advantage of mobile learning; Most students can respond to writing tasks in time, but a few students still have procrastination. From the cluster analysis of participation in mobile writing, students can be divided into four categories: balanced positive type, evaluation positive type, balanced negative type and evaluation negative type student; From the social network analysis of postpublication evaluation, the overall participation of students is very good, but the difference is great. The expert students are outstanding in the whole evaluation activities, and have gained great influence and prestige in the community. Before and after the test results show that the progress of mobile English writing group is significantly better than that of the control group. From the reflection of students, questionnaire and interview data. Students in mobile English writing learning self-perceived writing skills have improved, language has also made some progress, and gained a more positive emotional experience, enhance English writing self-confidence, reduce writing anxiety. It ensures the continuous input and the quality of learning, thus proves to some extent the validity of the mixed mode of mobile English writing. The further analysis of the qualitative data of students' reflection, questionnaires and interviews shows that. There are three factors that affect the students' learning behavior of mobile English writing, such as the utility expectation, easy-to-use expectation and external norm, of which the first two are mainly due to the role of technology in promoting learning. The external norms include the compulsory learning requirements of the curriculum and the internal driving force brought by the incentive mechanism. These three factors play a role through the intermediary of individual traits such as self-efficacy, motivation and personal preference. The paper puts forward some suggestions on the reform of English major teaching, the development of foreign language teachers under the background of information technology and the reform of the mechanism of promoting foreign language education technology in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海外國語大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：H319.3;G434

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬玉慧;趙樂;劉晴;;在線同伴評價(jià)的影響因素及其促進(jìn)策略研究[J];電化教育研究;2016年03期

2 吳越;;生態(tài)視域中EFL寫作測試與評估:遷移、構(gòu)念與體系[J];外語學(xué)刊;2015年06期

3 邵華;喻惠群;;基于泛在學(xué)習(xí)資源共享平臺(tái)的大學(xué)英語“翻轉(zhuǎn)課堂”教學(xué)模式設(shè)計(jì)研究[J];山東外語教學(xué);2015年03期

4 胡加圣;靳琰;;教育技術(shù)與外語課程融合的理論與實(shí)踐研究[J];中國電化教育;2015年04期

5 雷丹;柳華妮;;外語教師角色與教師生態(tài)位研究[J];外語電化教學(xué);2015年02期

6 顧小清;馮園園;胡思暢;;超越碎片化學(xué)習(xí):語義圖示與深度學(xué)習(xí)[J];中國電化教育;2015年03期

7 王丹;章艷樂;;基于混合學(xué)習(xí)理論的大學(xué)英語教學(xué)模式實(shí)踐[J];溫州醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

8 陳堅(jiān)林;;大數(shù)據(jù)時(shí)代的慕課與外語教學(xué)研究——挑戰(zhàn)與機(jī)遇[J];外語電化教學(xué);2015年01期

9 韓大偉;初勝華;;構(gòu)建基于計(jì)算機(jī)網(wǎng)絡(luò)學(xué)習(xí)平臺(tái)的辯論式寫作教學(xué)模式——一項(xiàng)促進(jìn)學(xué)生思辨能力發(fā)展的實(shí)證研究[J];山東外語教學(xué);2014年04期

10 劉萍;;大學(xué)生自我效能感與英語學(xué)習(xí)自主性的關(guān)系及促進(jìn)對策研究[J];外語電化教學(xué);2014年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1399958