【摘要】：從1992年提出“以市場換技術(shù)”就是希望利用FDI產(chǎn)生的技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)改善中國經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的質(zhì)量,而理論界對技術(shù)外溢是否產(chǎn)生卻沒有定論。隨著FDI跨國對象從發(fā)達(dá)國家轉(zhuǎn)向發(fā)展中國家,學(xué)者的研究中技術(shù)溢出的正向影響逐漸減弱,在對發(fā)展中國家的研究中越來越多考慮了東道國的吸收能力的技術(shù)溢出效果的影響。而從理論上外商直接投資(FDI)對東道國的技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)已經(jīng)達(dá)成了普遍共識,但對FDI技術(shù)外溢的實(shí)證研究卻存在很多分歧。當(dāng)然從研究技術(shù)方法層面講：數(shù)據(jù)的處理、歸回模型以及計(jì)量指標(biāo)的選擇必然會造成估計(jì)結(jié)果的不同,但更深層次的原因是前人的研究往往著重于對FDI對東道國國內(nèi)技術(shù)進(jìn)步的作用,未從東道國角度對溢出效應(yīng)進(jìn)行分析。從FDI的角度主要局限于對外資企業(yè)的區(qū)位選擇,及外資企業(yè)進(jìn)入國內(nèi)市場所帶來的先進(jìn)技術(shù)的傳播方式等。忽視了,除了外資企業(yè)的擴(kuò)散對內(nèi)資企業(yè)有很大影響,內(nèi)資企業(yè)自身對外溢出的先進(jìn)技術(shù)的學(xué)習(xí)模仿能力也會對FDI的技術(shù)外溢產(chǎn)生巨大影響。而東道國企業(yè)與外資企業(yè)的技術(shù)差距就是其內(nèi)資企業(yè)吸收能力的一個重要衡量部分。所以,經(jīng)過更多的研究開始著重于內(nèi)外資企業(yè)的技術(shù)差距對影響技術(shù)外溢效的影響。 基于此,本文通過對新增長理論的知識溢出模型進(jìn)行分析,選取內(nèi)外資技術(shù)差距為視角,研究術(shù)差距與FDI技術(shù)外溢的非線性關(guān)系。并運(yùn)用了Hansen(1999)門檻回歸模型對技術(shù)差距與FDI技術(shù)外溢的作用關(guān)系進(jìn)行分析。并綜合解釋了在實(shí)證研究中外資是否有溢出的爭論和分歧給出了合理解釋。并進(jìn)一步對我國的對外招商引資提出理論支撐和契合實(shí)際的建議。 本文的結(jié)論是：對于技術(shù)差距來而言技術(shù)外溢的發(fā)生存在門檻效應(yīng)。只有當(dāng)東道國內(nèi)資企業(yè)技術(shù)差距跨國門檻之后,技術(shù)效應(yīng)才會發(fā)生。而此后,技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)也不是全然遞增,達(dá)到一定峰值后,技術(shù)效應(yīng)將減弱。
[Abstract]:From 1992, it was put forward that "market for technology" is to improve the quality of China's economic growth by using the technology spillover effect produced by FDI, but there is no conclusion that whether technology spillover occurs or not. With the transition of FDI transnational objects from developed countries to developing countries, the positive impact of technology spillovers in the research of scholars has gradually weakened. In the research of developing countries, more and more consideration has been given to the effects of technology spillover effects of host countries' absorptive capacity. In theory, the technology spillover effect of foreign direct investment (FDI) to the host country has reached a general consensus, but there are many differences on the empirical study of FDI technology spillover. Of course, from the point of view of research technology and method: data processing, regression model and the choice of measurement indicators will inevitably lead to different estimation results. However, the deeper reason is that previous studies often focus on the role of FDI in the domestic technological progress of the host country, and do not analyze the spillover effect from the point of view of the host country. From the point of view of FDI, it is mainly limited to the location choice of foreign-funded enterprises and the dissemination of advanced technology brought by foreign-funded enterprises entering the domestic market. Ignore, apart from the diffusion of foreign-funded enterprises have a great impact on domestic enterprises, the ability of learning and imitating advanced technology spillover from domestic enterprises will also have a great impact on the technology spillover of FDI. The technological gap between the host and foreign enterprises is an important measure of their absorptive capacity. Therefore, after more research, we begin to focus on the impact of technology gap on technology spillover. Based on this, this paper analyzes the knowledge spillover model of the new growth theory, selects the technology gap between domestic and foreign capital as the perspective, and studies the nonlinear relationship between the technology gap and FDI technology spillover. Hansen (1999) threshold regression model is used to analyze the relationship between technology gap and FDI technology spillover. It also gives a reasonable explanation for the controversy and disagreement in empirical research on whether there is spillover of foreign capital. Furthermore, the author puts forward theoretical support and practical suggestions for attracting foreign investment. The conclusion of this paper is that there exists threshold effect for technology spillover. Only when the host country domestic enterprise technology gap cross-border threshold, the technology effect will occur. After that, the technology spillover effect is not completely increasing, and when it reaches a certain peak, the technology effect will weaken.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F273.1;F832.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 亓朋;許和連;艾洪山;;外商直接投資企業(yè)對內(nèi)資企業(yè)的溢出效應(yīng):對中國制造業(yè)企業(yè)的實(shí)證研究[J];管理世界;2008年04期

2 嚴(yán)兵;外商在華直接投資的溢出效應(yīng)——基于產(chǎn)業(yè)層面的分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2005年03期

3 黃靜;;影響FDI技術(shù)外溢效果的因素分析——基于吸收能力的研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2006年08期

4 秦曉鐘,胡志寶;外商對華直接投資技術(shù)外溢效應(yīng)的實(shí)證分析[J];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)探討;1998年04期

5 吳江;建國以來區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的歷史與經(jīng)驗(yàn)研討會概述[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動態(tài);2000年11期

6 賴明勇,包群;關(guān)于技術(shù)外溢與吸收能力的研究綜述——外商直接投資理論研究新進(jìn)展[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動態(tài);2003年08期

7 程培X=;周應(yīng)恒;殷志揚(yáng);;FDI對國內(nèi)投資的擠出(入)效應(yīng):產(chǎn)業(yè)組織視角[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)(季刊);2009年04期

8 路江涌;;外商直接投資對內(nèi)資企業(yè)效率的影響和渠道[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年06期

9 蔣殿春;張宇;;經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型與外商直接投資技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年07期

10 陳濤濤;狄瑞鵬;;我國FDI行業(yè)內(nèi)溢出效應(yīng)階段性特征的實(shí)證研究[J];金融研究;2008年06期

，

本文編號：2272997