【摘要】：隨著文化產(chǎn)業(yè)逐漸上升為我國(guó)的戰(zhàn)略性產(chǎn)業(yè)，如何實(shí)現(xiàn)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)與金融資本的有效對(duì)接，成為促進(jìn)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)長(zhǎng)足發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵，而以私募形式設(shè)立，以非上市文化企業(yè)股權(quán)投資為核心進(jìn)行運(yùn)作的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金，成為聯(lián)系文化產(chǎn)業(yè)與資本市場(chǎng)的重要媒介，本論文擬對(duì)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析研究,重點(diǎn)對(duì)以推動(dòng)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金市場(chǎng)化運(yùn)作為核心的相關(guān)法律制度建設(shè)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析研究。希望通過(guò)相關(guān)研究和分析，能夠?yàn)榇龠M(jìn)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金運(yùn)作的市場(chǎng)化、法制化提供幫助。 本論文共分六章。第一章導(dǎo)言部分，主要是明確論文選題的目的。即要通過(guò)對(duì)以推動(dòng)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金市場(chǎng)化運(yùn)作為核心的法律制度建設(shè)問(wèn)題的分析和研究，梳理當(dāng)前文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金市場(chǎng)化運(yùn)作中還存在的問(wèn)題，提出進(jìn)行相關(guān)法律制度建設(shè)的思考，從而能為推動(dòng)我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金運(yùn)作的市場(chǎng)化和法制化提供幫助，能為我國(guó)新興的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展提供自已的微薄之力。 第二章，圍繞文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金市場(chǎng)化運(yùn)作所依托的資本市場(chǎng)法律制度建設(shè)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行論述。先分析了資本市場(chǎng)的基本功能及文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金與資本市場(chǎng)的關(guān)系，指出了文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金運(yùn)作的市場(chǎng)化，取決于文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金所依托的資本市場(chǎng)相關(guān)功能的充分發(fā)揮。接著，論文進(jìn)一步論述多層次資本市場(chǎng)法律體系建立的重要性，指出建立多層次資本市場(chǎng)法律體系，是保障資本市場(chǎng)相關(guān)功能的發(fā)揮，促進(jìn)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金市場(chǎng)化運(yùn)作的關(guān)鍵。最后，論文提出了進(jìn)一步完善多層次資本市場(chǎng)法律體系的建議的思考，即要加快非上市企業(yè)股份流通系統(tǒng)法律制度建設(shè)；推動(dòng)以注冊(cè)制為核心的企業(yè)上市發(fā)審制度改革和相關(guān)法律制度建設(shè)。 第三章,圍繞文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金設(shè)立的法律制度建設(shè)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行論述。首先對(duì)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金設(shè)立的行政審批備案制進(jìn)行概述。進(jìn)而分析了文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金設(shè)立的行政化所產(chǎn)生的弊端。在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金設(shè)立去行政化的法律制度建設(shè)思考。即把文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金的設(shè)立活動(dòng)納入到基金法統(tǒng)一監(jiān)管的法律體系當(dāng)中，接受以基金法為核心的法律體系的統(tǒng)一監(jiān)管，引導(dǎo)和規(guī)范，讓文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金成為直正的市場(chǎng)主體，從而實(shí)現(xiàn)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金運(yùn)行市場(chǎng)化和法制化。 第四章，著重論述了文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金治理結(jié)構(gòu)相關(guān)法律制度完善的問(wèn)題。治理結(jié)構(gòu)是現(xiàn)代企業(yè)制度的核心。文章先對(duì)企業(yè)治理結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)置所涉及的相關(guān)法律規(guī)范進(jìn)行了概述。進(jìn)而分析了文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金治理結(jié)構(gòu)具體實(shí)踐所存在的問(wèn)題，即公司制文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金的治理結(jié)構(gòu)中大小股東權(quán)利不平衡，有限合伙制文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金治理結(jié)構(gòu)中合伙人之間權(quán)利義務(wù)的不對(duì)等。其后提出了解決問(wèn)題的改革路徑及相關(guān)法律制度完善的思考，即進(jìn)行以去行政化為核心的理事會(huì)治理結(jié)構(gòu)模式的改革；建立公司制下AB雙層股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)為核心的治理結(jié)構(gòu)模式；建立合伙制下有限，普通合伙人權(quán)利義務(wù)對(duì)等的治理結(jié)構(gòu)模式，并針對(duì)這些治理結(jié)構(gòu)的相關(guān)改革，就相關(guān)法律制度的完善問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了思考，希望從構(gòu)建現(xiàn)代企業(yè)法律制度的角度為文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金的市場(chǎng)化運(yùn)作提供法律制度的保障。 第五章，對(duì)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金投資相關(guān)的法律制度完善問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了思考。先對(duì)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金投資活動(dòng)所涉及的相關(guān)法律制度進(jìn)行了概述。進(jìn)而對(duì)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金在股權(quán)投資過(guò)程中所遇到的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了分析，即投資準(zhǔn)入政策對(duì)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資的限制，，文化產(chǎn)業(yè)現(xiàn)有監(jiān)管政策對(duì)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資的可能影響，投資相關(guān)的稅收法律政策優(yōu)惠度不足，投資中介服務(wù)法律體系不完善。在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了完善投資相關(guān)的法律制度的思考。即建立和完善文化產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)容生產(chǎn)和傳播等相關(guān)的監(jiān)管法律體系；建立和完善優(yōu)惠的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金投資相關(guān)的稅收法律制度；建立和完善文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資的中介服務(wù)法律體系。從而調(diào)動(dòng)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)設(shè)資基金的積極性，推動(dòng)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金市場(chǎng)化運(yùn)作，促進(jìn)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展。 第六章，對(duì)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金投資退出相關(guān)的法律制度建設(shè)進(jìn)行了思考。先對(duì)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金投資退出的相關(guān)法律制度進(jìn)行了概述。進(jìn)而對(duì)所存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了分析，指出企業(yè)上市行政核準(zhǔn)制，新三板協(xié)議交易制等制度制約了資本市場(chǎng)功能的充分發(fā)揮以及轉(zhuǎn)板制度的不完善割裂了資本市場(chǎng)之間的聯(lián)系等原因影響了文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金多元化，市場(chǎng)化退出戰(zhàn)略的順利實(shí)施。最后，論文提出了完善投資退出的相關(guān)法律制度的建議，即要推動(dòng)以注冊(cè)制為核心的上市發(fā)審制度改革，要完善全國(guó)中小企業(yè)股份轉(zhuǎn)讓系統(tǒng)的交易制度，掛牌企業(yè)信息披露制度以及適格投資者管理制度，要完善資本市場(chǎng)轉(zhuǎn)板制度,要完善文化產(chǎn)業(yè)版權(quán)保護(hù)制度和加強(qiáng)相關(guān)執(zhí)法力度。以通過(guò)上述相關(guān)法律制度的完善和保障，來(lái)推動(dòng)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金多元化，市場(chǎng)化退出戰(zhàn)略的實(shí)施。從而實(shí)現(xiàn)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金運(yùn)作的市場(chǎng)化、法制化。進(jìn)而促進(jìn)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的繁榮與發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the gradual rise of the cultural industry to a strategic industry in China, how to achieve an effective docking of the cultural industry and financial capital has become the key to promote the rapid development of the cultural industry. The cultural industry investment fund, which is set up in the form of private placement and operated with the equity investment of non-listed cultural enterprises as the core, has become a link between the cultural industry and capital. The important media of this market, this paper intends to analyze and study the relevant legal issues of the cultural industry investment fund, focusing on the promotion of the market-oriented operation of the cultural industry investment fund as the core of the relevant legal system construction. To provide assistance for marketization and legalization.
The first chapter is the introduction of the thesis, which is mainly to clarify the purpose of the topic. That is to say, through the analysis and study of the legal system construction with the core of promoting the market-oriented operation of the cultural industry investment funds, the paper combs the problems existing in the current market-oriented operation of the cultural industry investment funds and puts forward the relevant laws. Consideration on the construction of the system can help promote the marketization and legalization of the operation of the cultural industry investment funds in China, and provide our own meager power for the development of the new cultural industry in China.
Chapter two discusses the legal system construction of the capital market on which the market-oriented operation of the cultural industry investment fund depends. First, it analyzes the basic functions of the capital market and the relationship between the cultural industry investment fund and the capital market, and points out that the market-oriented operation of the cultural industry investment fund depends on the cultural industry investment fund. Secondly, the paper further discusses the importance of establishing a multi-level capital market legal system, and points out that the establishment of a multi-level capital market legal system is the key to ensure the relevant functions of the capital market and promote the market-oriented operation of the cultural industry investment funds. To perfect the legal system of the multi-level capital market, we should speed up the construction of the legal system of the non-listed enterprises'share circulation system, promote the reform of the listing examination system and the construction of the relevant legal system with the registration system as the core.
Chapter three discusses the legal system construction of the establishment of cultural industry investment fund. Firstly, the administrative examination and approval filing system of the establishment of cultural industry investment fund is summarized. Then the disadvantages of the administrative establishment of cultural industry investment fund are analyzed. Thoughts on the construction of a political legal system, that is, to bring the establishment of cultural industry investment funds into the legal system of the unified supervision of the fund law, to accept the unified supervision of the legal system with the fund law as the core, to guide and standardize, and to make the cultural industry investment funds become the upright Market subject, so as to realize the transportation of cultural industry investment funds Marketing and legalization.
Chapter Four focuses on the perfection of relevant legal systems concerning the governance structure of cultural industry investment funds. Governance structure is the core of modern enterprise system. The article first outlines the relevant legal norms involved in the establishment of corporate governance structure, and then analyzes the problems existing in the specific practice of the governance structure of cultural industry investment funds. It is pointed out that the rights and obligations of the large and small shareholders in the governance structure of the corporate cultural industry investment fund are unbalanced, and the rights and obligations of the partners in the governance structure of the limited partnership cultural industry investment fund are unequal. The reform of the governance structure mode of the council; the establishment of the AB double-layer equity structure under the corporate system as the core of the governance structure mode; the establishment of a limited partnership, the rights and obligations of the general partners are equal governance structure mode, and in view of the relevant reform of the governance structure, on the improvement of the relevant legal system issues, hoping from the construction The modern enterprise legal system provides the legal system guarantee for the market operation of the cultural industry investment fund.
In the fifth chapter, the author thinks about the perfection of the legal system related to the investment of cultural industry investment fund. Firstly, the author summarizes the relevant legal systems involved in the investment activities of cultural industry investment fund, and then analyzes the problems encountered in the process of equity investment of cultural industry investment fund, that is, the investment admission policy. On the basis of the limitation of investment in chemical industry, the possible impact of existing supervision policies on investment in cultural industry, the inadequate preferential system of investment-related tax laws and policies, and the imperfect legal system of investment intermediary services, this paper puts forward some suggestions on perfecting the investment-related legal system, that is, establishing and improving the content production and dissemination of cultural industry. We should establish and perfect the tax law system related to the investment of the preferential cultural industry investment fund, establish and perfect the intermediary service law system of the cultural industry investment, so as to arouse the enthusiasm of the cultural industry investment fund, promote the market operation of the cultural industry investment fund and promote the development of the cultural industry. Exhibition.
Chapter Six gives some thoughts on the construction of the legal system related to the withdrawal of cultural industry investment funds. First, it summarizes the relevant legal system of the withdrawal of cultural industry investment funds. Then it analyzes the existing problems and points out that the administrative approval system for listing enterprises and the new three-board agreement trading system restrict the capital market. The full play of the market function and the imperfection of the switchboard system split the links between the capital market and other factors, which affected the diversification of cultural industry investment funds and the smooth implementation of the market exit strategy. Finally, the paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the relevant legal system of investment exit, that is, to promote the registration system as the core of the listing examination. To reform the system, we should perfect the trading system of the share transfer system of small and medium-sized enterprises in China, the information disclosure system of listed enterprises and the management system of qualified investors, the capital market switchboard system, the copyright protection system of cultural industries and the enforcement of relevant laws. The diversification of cultural industry investment funds and the implementation of market-oriented exit strategy will help to realize the marketization and legalization of the operation of cultural industry investment funds and promote the prosperity and development of cultural industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中共廣東省委黨校
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.287

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 張偉;周魯柱;;我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資存在的問(wèn)題及基本對(duì)策[J];現(xiàn)代傳播(中國(guó)傳媒大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2006年04期

本文編號(hào)：2234724