【摘要】：我國的利率市場化進程起始于1996年,現(xiàn)如今,債券市場利率、貸款利率等都已實現(xiàn)市場化,存款利率上限的放開將是我國利率市場化改革的最后一步,而建立有效的基準(zhǔn)利率是貨幣當(dāng)局放開存款利率管制的前提和條件。2007年1月4日,中央人民銀行正式推出上海銀行間同業(yè)拆借利率Shibor,以期將其培育成為我國貨幣市場的基準(zhǔn)利率,從而促進利率市場化改革,并實現(xiàn)我國貨幣政策從數(shù)量型調(diào)控向價格型調(diào)控的轉(zhuǎn)變。有效的基準(zhǔn)利率作為金融市場利率體系的核心,不僅迅速反映貨幣市場資金的供給與需求,還為其他利率與金融產(chǎn)品提供定價基準(zhǔn),因此,基準(zhǔn)利率的建立對于我國金融市場的改革有著重大意義。目前Shibor已正式運行將近8年,其運行情況如何?是否已具備基準(zhǔn)利率的屬性?存在哪些不足?該如何改進?本文將通過定性分析與定量分析依次回答這些問題。 首先,文章基于利率決定理論、對國際基準(zhǔn)利率的經(jīng)驗分析以及國內(nèi)的研究,總結(jié)出有效的基準(zhǔn)利率所需具備的屬性：市場性、基礎(chǔ)性、經(jīng)濟傳導(dǎo)性、波動合理性。其次,介紹我國貨幣市場上具有部分基準(zhǔn)屬性的利率：一年期存款利率、央行票據(jù)發(fā)行利率、銀行間債券質(zhì)押式回購利率以及全國銀行間同業(yè)拆借利率,分析這四種利率的缺陷,討論其無法作為基準(zhǔn)利率的原因,進而引導(dǎo)出Shibor,具體介紹其運行機制,從理論上的合理性和實際上的可操作性分析Shibor作為我國基準(zhǔn)利率的可行性。接著,通過實證分析,從Shibor的市場性、基礎(chǔ)性、經(jīng)濟傳導(dǎo)性以及波動合理性四個方面分析其作為我國貨幣市場基準(zhǔn)利率的有效性。 實證結(jié)果表明Shibor已經(jīng)在我國貨幣市場中確立了基準(zhǔn)利率的地位,其具備良好的市場性和基礎(chǔ)性,但是仍然存在很多不足：以Shibor作為基準(zhǔn)利率的金融產(chǎn)品逐漸增多,但是所占比例還有很大的上升空間；同業(yè)拆借市場的交易規(guī)模與債券市場相比差距仍然較大,從而影響Shibor的有效性；Shibor的經(jīng)濟傳導(dǎo)性表明Shibor由貨幣政策到宏觀經(jīng)濟的路徑并不暢通,需要改進；Shibor的波動比較靈敏,能夠及時反映出金融市場資金的供求狀況,但是面對新股發(fā)行時,市場表現(xiàn)出較強的非理性。 最后,文章從Shibor自身的運行機制與運行市場的環(huán)境兩個角度分析Shibor的制約因素,并且提出增強Shibor有效性的措施,即：健全Shibor的報價機制、提高報價行的定價能力、增加同業(yè)拆借市場參與主體、深化利率市場化改革以及完善利率傳導(dǎo)機制。
[Abstract]:The process of interest rate marketization in our country began in 1996. Now, the interest rate of bond market and loan interest rate have all been marketized. The liberalization of the upper limit of deposit interest rate will be the last step of the marketization reform of interest rate in our country. The establishment of an effective benchmark interest rate is the prerequisite and condition for the monetary authorities to liberalize the interest rate on deposits. On January 4, 2007, The people's Bank of China officially launched the Shanghai Interbank offered rate (Shibor,) in order to cultivate it as the benchmark interest rate in China's money market, thus promoting the reform of interest rate marketization. And realize the change of monetary policy from quantitative control to price control. As the core of the interest rate system of financial market, effective benchmark interest rate not only reflects the supply and demand of money market funds, but also provides pricing benchmark for other interest rates and financial products. The establishment of benchmark interest rate is of great significance to the reform of our financial market. At present, Shibor has been officially running for nearly 8 years. How is its operation? Do you have the properties of the benchmark interest rate? What are the shortcomings? How to improve? This paper will answer these questions by qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis. Firstly, based on the theory of interest rate determination, the empirical analysis of international benchmark interest rate and the domestic research, the paper summarizes the attributes of effective benchmark interest rate: market, basic, economic conductivity and fluctuation rationality. Secondly, the paper introduces some benchmark interest rates in China's money market: one-year deposit rate, central bank bill issuance rate, interbank bond pledge repurchase rate and national interbank lending rate. This paper analyzes the defects of these four interest rates, discusses the reasons why they can not be used as benchmark interest rates, and then leads Shibor, to introduce its operating mechanism in detail, and analyzes the feasibility of Shibor as a benchmark interest rate in China from the theoretical rationality and practical maneuverability. Then, through the empirical analysis, this paper analyzes the validity of Shibor as the benchmark interest rate of our country's money market from four aspects: marketability, foundation, economic conductivity and fluctuation rationality. The empirical results show that Shibor has established the status of benchmark interest rate in China's money market, which has good marketability and foundation, but there are still many shortcomings: the number of financial products with Shibor as the benchmark interest rate is increasing gradually. However, there is still a lot of room to rise in the proportion of the interbank lending market. The trading scale of the interbank lending market is still quite different from that of the bond market, which affects the effectiveness of Shibor. The economic conductivity of Shibor indicates that the path from monetary policy to macro-economy is not smooth, and the fluctuation of Shibor needs to be improved, which can reflect the supply and demand of funds in the financial market in time, but in the face of new issue, The market shows strong irrationality. Finally, this paper analyzes the restrictive factors of Shibor from the aspects of its own operating mechanism and operating market environment, and puts forward some measures to enhance the effectiveness of Shibor, that is, to perfect the pricing mechanism of Shibor, and to improve the pricing ability of quoting banks. Increase interbank lending market participants, deepen interest rate marketization reform and improve the interest rate transmission mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F832.5

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 時光;高珂;;對SHIBOR作為我國貨幣市場基準(zhǔn)利率的有效性檢驗[J];財經(jīng)科學(xué);2012年02期

2 李社環(huán);適應(yīng)我國利率全面市場化的基準(zhǔn)利率的研究[J];財經(jīng)研究;2001年04期

3 李良松;柳永明;;新魏克塞爾主義下我國基準(zhǔn)利率的比較與定位[J];財經(jīng)研究;2009年06期

4 李宏瑾;項衛(wèi)星;;中央銀行基準(zhǔn)利率、公開市場操作與間接貨幣調(diào)控——對央票操作及其基準(zhǔn)利率作用的實證分析[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2010年04期

5 中國工商銀行城市金融研究所課題組;詹向陽;樊志剛;趙新杰;;銀行間市場基準(zhǔn)利率體系選擇及Shibor運行分析——兼析基準(zhǔn)利率變動對商業(yè)銀行的影響[J];金融論壇;2008年04期

6 方意;趙勝民;;利率雙軌制下我國金融市場基準(zhǔn)利率的選擇研究——基于有向無環(huán)圖的分析[J];當(dāng)代財經(jīng);2012年07期

7 李揚;中國利率市場化:做了什么,要做什么[J];國際金融研究;2003年09期

8 溫彬;我國利率市場化后基準(zhǔn)利率選擇的實證研究[J];國際金融研究;2004年11期

9 彭紅楓;魯維潔;;中國金融市場基準(zhǔn)利率的選擇研究[J];管理世界;2010年11期

10 葉永剛;陳勃特;;中國政策利率調(diào)控對市場基準(zhǔn)利率的影響研究[J];管理世界;2012年04期

，

本文編號：2206410