本文關(guān)鍵詞：發(fā)達國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度比較及中國借鑒研究　出處：《華東交通大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托 比較研究 現(xiàn)狀 完善

【摘要】：經(jīng)濟增長方式的轉(zhuǎn)變，知識經(jīng)濟的到來，各國開始重視科技競爭，提出了“知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的無限創(chuàng)造力是科技競爭的核心”口號，把科技的先進動力轉(zhuǎn)化為現(xiàn)實的生產(chǎn)力是各國的科技工作的關(guān)鍵。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)授權(quán)量的急速增加，市場對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的需求量也日益增加，供需關(guān)系的不平衡這種形式急需為知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的轉(zhuǎn)化尋找一個突破口，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托便在這種形勢下應(yīng)運而生。將知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度信托化，一方面可以實現(xiàn)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度自身的價值，即服務(wù)于社會，另一方面也有利于解決我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)化中存在的轉(zhuǎn)化渠道難的問題，從而實現(xiàn)雙贏的局面，既發(fā)展了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)，又利用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)創(chuàng)造了經(jīng)濟價值。 本文擬通過分析信托制度的概念、分類和特征，提出知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度的概念、分類與法律關(guān)系和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托的優(yōu)勢，通過分析發(fā)達美、日、歐盟等國家的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度現(xiàn)狀以及比較其知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托立法制度、登記制度和監(jiān)管制度，分析我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度的現(xiàn)狀及存在的問題，通過對比借鑒發(fā)達國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律制度，針對我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度的不足之處，從完善法律法規(guī)制度、登記制度、風險防范機制、及權(quán)利歸屬、信托機構(gòu)等方面提出針對性的建議，完善我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度，促使我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律制度更好的發(fā)展。 同時，本文將在分析發(fā)達國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度現(xiàn)狀基礎(chǔ)上，結(jié)合“武漢的專利信托”和“中國首例商標信托案”等案例分析我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度實證分析，具體分析我國實踐中知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托所存在的問題，通過對比分析立法現(xiàn)狀、登記現(xiàn)狀、風險防范現(xiàn)狀等，完善我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度。本文擬從以下六個方面進行探討： 第一部分是緒論，主要是對本課題的來源、目的、意義及研究方法和思路做一個說明，從宏觀上架構(gòu)本文的結(jié)構(gòu)。 第二部分是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托制度的概述，這一部分先對信托制度做一個簡單的介紹，然后引出知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托制度，從知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托制度的起源、發(fā)展和進行知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托的必要性來對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托制度做較全面的敘述。 第三部分是分析發(fā)達國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度的現(xiàn)狀，通過分析美國專利投資信托、美國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)證券化、日本的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度演變以及歐盟的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托業(yè)務(wù)狀況，以便對下文的發(fā)達國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度的比較和完善我國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度提供參考意見。 第四部分是比較發(fā)達國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度，通過美、日、英三國的立法制度、登記制度、監(jiān)管制度分析其在監(jiān)管機構(gòu)及其相關(guān)法律對設(shè)立知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托機構(gòu)的不同規(guī)定。 第五部分是通過一些案例引出我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托在法律制度、登記制度、風險制度、權(quán)利歸屬、信托機構(gòu)等方面的現(xiàn)狀，分析其存在的問題，這一部分是有針對性的對我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托方面存在的問題列出，為后面的完善建議打下基礎(chǔ)。 第六部分是立足于我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度的現(xiàn)狀及問題，針對提出的問題，借鑒發(fā)達國家對于此方面的先進經(jīng)驗，一一提出完善的建議，這也是本文對我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度的經(jīng)驗總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:Change the mode of economic growth, the advent of knowledge economy, all countries begin to pay attention to the competition of science and technology, put forward the "infinite creativity of intellectual property is the core competition of science and technology" slogan, the advanced power technology into real productivity is the key national science and technology work. Intellectual property licensing quantity increases rapidly, the market demand for knowledge the amount of property is also increasing, the imbalance between supply and demand for this form needs the transformation of intellectual property to find a breakthrough, intellectual property trust emerges in this situation. The system of intellectual property trust, one can achieve the value of their own intellectual property system, which is to serve the society, on the other hand there are to solve the transformation of channels there are property rights in China in the transformation of knowledge difficult problem, so as to achieve a win-win situation, not only the development of intellectual property, the intellectual property rights created Economic value.
This paper through the analysis of the concept of trust system, classification and characteristics, puts forward the concept of legal system of intellectual property trust, classification and legal relationship of intellectual property trust and advantage, developed through the analysis of beauty, on the legal system of intellectual property trust status of the European Union and other countries as well as the intellectual property trust legislation system, registration system and supervision system analysis of the status quo, the trust legal system of intellectual property rights in China and the existing problems, through the comparison of the legal system of intellectual property rights in developed countries, in view of the lack of trust legal system of intellectual property rights in China at registration system from the perfect legal laws and regulations system, risk prevention mechanism, and put forward the rights of ownership, trust institutions targeted suggestions to improve the trust legal system of intellectual property in China, to promote better development of the legal system of intellectual property in China.
At the same time, the analysis of the present situation of the legal system of intellectual property trust in developed countries, combined with the "Wuhan patent trust" and "Chinese first trademark trust case and case analysis of empirical analysis of the trust legal system of intellectual property in China, analyzes problems in the intellectual property trust practice in China, through the comparative analysis of the legislative status quo registration, status quo, risk prevention status, improve the legal system of intellectual property trust in China. This paper discusses from the following six aspects:
The first part is the introduction, which mainly explains the source, purpose, significance and research methods and ideas of the subject, and constructs the structure of this article from the macro level.
The second part is an overview of intellectual property trust system, the first part of the trust system to do a simple introduction, then introduced the intellectual property trust system, from the origin of the trust system, the necessity and the development of intellectual property trust to do a more comprehensive description of the intellectual property trust system.
The third part is the analysis of the current situation of trust legal system of intellectual property rights in developed countries, through the analysis of the United States Patent Investment Trusts, the securitization of intellectual property rights, legal system of intellectual property trust evolution of Japan and EU intellectual property trust business, in order to improve the comparison of and below the developed country intellectual property trust legal system of intellectual property in China trust legal system provides a reference.
The fourth part is the legal system of intellectual property trust in developed countries. Through the legislative system, registration system and regulatory system in the United States, Japan, Britain and the United Kingdom, it analyzes the different provisions of the regulatory agencies and their related laws on the establishment of intellectual property trust institutions.
The fifth part is through some cases leads to our country's intellectual property trust in the legal system, registration system, risk system, ownership rights, the current situation of trust institutions, analyzes the existing problems, this part is targeted on the existence of China's intellectual property trust issues listed, suggestions to lay the foundation for later perfect.
The sixth part is based on the current situation and problems of the legal system of intellectual property trust in China. Aiming at the problems raised, and using the advanced experience of developed countries for reference, we put forward perfect proposals one by one, which is also the experience summary of our legal system of intellectual property trust.

【學位授予單位】：華東交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.282

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 卞耀武;;中國的信托法律制度[J];中國法律;2003年02期

2 余輝;近現(xiàn)代英國信托法律制度的確立[J];法律科學.西北政法學院學報;2003年06期

3 余輝;信托法律制度的肇始——英國1536年《用益法》[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2003年03期

4 袁碧華;信托法律制度的承繼與本土化——信托法律制度的比較研究[J];廣東商學院學報;2003年06期

5 王海英;鄧延良;;論我國信托法律制度的完善[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2008年02期

6 蔡慶輝;論我國信托法律制度的現(xiàn)狀與立法的完善[J];東南學術(shù);1998年04期

7 蔡慶輝;論我國信托法律制度現(xiàn)狀與立法完善[J];云南法學;1998年04期

8 黃曉慧;香港信托法律制度淺探[J];西南民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2000年09期

9 李抗;信托法律制度及其在我國的實踐[J];貴州商專學報;1994年04期

10 王金玉;;信托法律制度的沖突法分析及其適用[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學院學報;2008年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前4條

1 記者 姜瑜　李茜;完善信托法律制度刻不容緩[N];上海金融報;2011年

2 邱金枝 梁善寶 鄒德彥;信托能幫助解決銀行不良債權(quán)[N];檢察日報;2002年

3 黃嵩;財產(chǎn)權(quán)信托法律制度亟待完善[N];中國證券報;2004年

4 鄧梅芳;金融創(chuàng)新亟需建立完善法律制度[N];國際金融報;2001年

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 石緯林;信托法律制度的經(jīng)濟分析[D];吉林大學;2009年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前10條

1 于文君;中外信托法律制度比較研究[D];哈爾濱工程大學;2007年

2 李毅;房地產(chǎn)投資信托法律制度研究[D];中央民族大學;2010年

3 王丹;我國農(nóng)村土地信托法律制度研究[D];湘潭大學;2010年

4 付玉林;中外信托法律制度比較研究[D];哈爾濱工程大學;2005年

5 盧承灝;我國信托法律制度的確立與完善[D];對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學;2004年

6 王湘平;我國農(nóng)村土地信托法律制度之研究[D];中南大學;2007年

7 趙婷;公益信托法律制度研究[D];西北大學;2010年

8 肖玉生;論信托法律制度下受托人的義務(wù)[D];西北大學;2008年

9 陳禹;我國房地產(chǎn)信托法律制度的完善[D];吉林大學;2014年

10 劉永鋒;農(nóng)村土地信托法律制度研究[D];蘭州大學;2006年

，

本文編號：1391038