本文選題：政策咨詢 + 半官方智庫(kù)��； 參考：《現(xiàn)代教育管理》2015年12期

【摘要】：半官方教育智庫(kù)有著不同于官方和民間智庫(kù)的特點(diǎn)。以香港"教育統(tǒng)籌委員會(huì)"為例,半官方教育智庫(kù)的政策咨詢功能表現(xiàn)為:一方面,通過多種調(diào)研與分析機(jī)制提供"專家智慧",提升政策的科學(xué)性;另一方面,作為各利益群體相互博弈的平臺(tái),傳遞與整合利益訴求,提升政策的合法性。香港的經(jīng)驗(yàn)對(duì)完善內(nèi)地教育智庫(kù)的功能、體系和制度,提升智庫(kù)的獨(dú)立性和影響力,具有重要啟示。
[Abstract]:The semi-official education think tank has the characteristic which is different from the official and the non-governmental think tank. Taking the Hong Kong Education Commission as an example, the policy advisory functions of quasi-official education think tanks are: on the one hand, to provide "expert wisdom" through a variety of research and analysis mechanisms, and on the other hand, to enhance the scientific nature of policies. As the platform of game between different interest groups, it can transfer and integrate interest demands and enhance the legitimacy of policy. Hong Kong's experience has important implications for improving the functions, systems and systems of mainland educational think tanks and enhancing their independence and influence.
【作者單位】： 英國(guó)倫敦大學(xué)學(xué)院;
【基金】：“顧明遠(yuǎn)教育研究發(fā)展基金”2012-2013年度資助項(xiàng)目(2012010)
【分類號(hào)】：G527
，

本文編號(hào)：2107877