高等學(xué)校基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施:效用偏差評價與供給邏輯分析
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 普通高校 基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施 效用偏差 供給邏輯 出處:《教育與經(jīng)濟》2015年01期 論文類型:期刊論文
【摘要】:1999年開始的大學(xué)擴招進程中,普通高等學(xué)校面臨"基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施效用不彰"的問題。以學(xué)生類校舍的生均面積及其"標桿值"為基礎(chǔ),以各學(xué)生類校舍的"效用偏差"為分析對象,采用熵值法測算了八類校舍"效用偏差"的權(quán)重,評價了擴招以來各年度學(xué)生類校舍的效用總偏差。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):八種學(xué)生類校舍的"效用偏差"可以區(qū)分為"保健型"指標、"激勵型"指標和"中間型"指標三種類型;擴招以來的學(xué)生類校舍綜合效用處于"不彰"甚至一定程度的"倒退"狀態(tài)。研究結(jié)論是:第一,政府對普通高;A(chǔ)設(shè)施缺乏有力的宏觀調(diào)控;第二,普通高校打了一場后勤保障投入失當(dāng)?shù)?擴招之戰(zhàn)"但面臨提高學(xué)生類校舍綜合效用的"重要機遇期";第三,普通高校具有實現(xiàn)組織利益最大化的傾向;第四,普通高校在基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給方面體現(xiàn)了"趕牛式"行政的特征,且形成了一定程度的"投入慣性效應(yīng)"。
[Abstract]:In 1999, in the process of university enrollment expansion, ordinary colleges and universities are faced with the problem of "inadequate utility of infrastructure", which is based on the average area of students' school premises and their "benchmark value". Taking the "utility deviation" of each student school building as the analysis object, the weight of the "utility deviation" of the eight kinds of school buildings is calculated by the entropy method. This paper evaluates the total utility deviation of the student school buildings in each year since the expansion of enrollment. The study finds that the "utility deviation" of the eight kinds of student schools can be divided into "health care type" indicators. "incentive type" index and "intermediate type" index three types; Since the expansion of enrollment, the comprehensive utility of student school buildings is in a state of "inefficiency" or even "retrogression" to a certain extent. The conclusions of the study are as follows: first, the government lacks strong macro-control over the infrastructure of ordinary colleges and universities; Second, colleges and universities have played a "war of expanding enrollment" with improper input of logistics support, but they are faced with the "important opportunity period" to improve the comprehensive utility of students' school buildings; Third, colleges and universities have the tendency to realize the maximization of organizational interests; In 4th, ordinary colleges and universities embodied the characteristics of "cattle herding" administration in infrastructure supply, and formed a certain degree of "input inertia effect".
【作者單位】: 蘭州大學(xué)管理學(xué)院;
【基金】:國家自然科學(xué)基金重點項目“政府職能轉(zhuǎn)變背景下績效管理研究”(項目編號:71433005);國家自然科學(xué)基金面上項目“基于公共價值的政府績效結(jié)構(gòu)、生成機制及中國情境下的實證研究(項目編號:71373107)”
【分類號】:G40-054
【正文快照】: 1詳情參見:高校擴招帶來的問題極其嚴重[EB/OL].http://bbs1.people.com.cn/post/2/1/1/142272655.html/2014-10-01.2詳情參見:高校擴招,大學(xué)生卻蝸居舊校舍[EB/OL].http://gaokao.gaofen.com/article/133595.htm/2014-10-01.3詳情參見:深大學(xué)生因校舍不足寄宿城中村上課要走
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 黃淑霞;;高校生均綜合定額撥款模式探討[J];財會通訊;2010年17期
2 尚虎平;;行將勃興的“治理績效管理”潮流——基于第三次明諾布魯克會議的預(yù)測[J];公共管理學(xué)報;2010年01期
3 王富喜;毛愛華;李赫龍;賈明璐;;基于熵值法的山東省城鎮(zhèn)化質(zhì)量測度及空間差異分析[J];地理科學(xué);2013年11期
4 陳文藝;高校教育資源浪費現(xiàn)象探析[J];華南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年01期
5 鄒華;徐玢玢;楊朔;;基于熵值法的我國區(qū)域創(chuàng)新能力評價研究[J];科技管理研究;2013年23期
6 胡永宏;對TOPSIS法用于綜合評價的改進[J];數(shù)學(xué)的實踐與認識;2002年04期
【共引文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陽曦;張新全;王運琦;王贊;張耿;高洪文;于遵波;;高燕麥草苗期耐鹽性鑒定及綜合評價[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2006年23期
2 王彬;傅賢治;張士康;;基于熵權(quán)TOPSIS模型的鮮活農(nóng)產(chǎn)品供應(yīng)商評價研究[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2008年13期
3 董t熺,
本文編號:1485676
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/xuekejiaoyulunwen/1485676.html