本文選題：建筑教育 + 臺灣建筑教育��； 參考：《天津大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國大陸的現(xiàn)代建筑教育已經(jīng)發(fā)展了近一百年，不斷有學者進行反思，筆者在臺灣交換學習半年間，對臺灣的大學部建筑教育進行深入的調(diào)研和分析，認識到目前臺灣的大學部建筑教育有許多和中國大陸不同的地方，本文從建筑學科的角度總結(jié)這種區(qū)別，希望對中國大陸的建筑教育發(fā)展有所幫助。 中國大陸的建筑教育發(fā)展迅速，但卻在質(zhì)量上令人堪憂，大學培養(yǎng)的建筑人才，缺乏在人文、美學等基本素質(zhì)的教育，如果建筑師受到的教育只是先進技術(shù)和建筑思潮的灌注，缺少提高自身修養(yǎng)的能力和厚積薄發(fā)的潛力，那么具有本土特色的建筑就無法獲得傳承和發(fā)揚光大。臺灣的建筑教育中如何對這些方面進行有意的培養(yǎng)和關(guān)注，中國大陸的建筑教育中怎樣借鑒，，是本文的意義和目的所在。 本文回顧了臺灣現(xiàn)代建筑教育的發(fā)展史，擇具有代表性的八所學校建筑系的教學情況從教育目標、學分配置、課程安排、師資配備和評圖競圖幾個方面進行對比和研究，總結(jié)出目前臺灣大學部建筑教育體系的基本框架和主要特征。第四章分節(jié)詳細闡述了臺灣成功大學、東海大學、淡江大學、中原大學、臺北科技大學和實踐大學的建筑系基本情況和教學特色；第五章對臺灣建筑教育發(fā)展過程中有重要意義的人物進行介紹，他們分別是金長銘、漢寶德和傅朝卿。最后，本文的結(jié)語部分通過對大陸建筑教育存在的問題進行羅列和分析，與臺灣大學部建筑教育對比和研究，總結(jié)出大陸建筑教育中需要借鑒臺灣建筑教育的方面，引發(fā)對大陸建筑教育的深層次反思，展望未來的建筑教育，希望得到更多學者的關(guān)注和思考。附錄部分是臺灣建筑界學者對待臺灣建筑教育認識的訪談錄，以期能從當?shù)厝说挠^點中認識臺灣的建筑教育。
[Abstract]:Modern architecture education in mainland China has been developing for nearly 100 years, and scholars have been constantly reflecting on it. During the six months of exchange study in Taiwan, the author made a thorough investigation and analysis on the architectural education of Taiwan's universities. It is recognized that there are many differences between the architectural education in Taiwan and that in mainland China. This paper summarizes this difference from the point of view of architecture, hoping to be helpful to the development of architecture education in mainland China. The architectural education in mainland China has developed rapidly, but its quality is worrying. The architectural talents trained by universities lack the education of basic qualities such as humanities and aesthetics. If the education of architects is only the instillation of advanced technology and architectural thoughts, Without the ability and potential to improve self-cultivation, the architecture with local characteristics can not be passed on and carried forward. How to cultivate and pay attention to these aspects in the architectural education of Taiwan and how to draw lessons from the architectural education in mainland China is the meaning and purpose of this paper. This paper reviews the history of modern architecture education in Taiwan, and compares and studies the teaching situation of architecture departments in eight representative schools from the aspects of educational objectives, credit allocation, curriculum arrangement, teacher allocation and evaluation and drawing. This paper summarizes the basic framework and main features of the architecture education system of Taiwan's Ministry of higher Education. The fourth chapter elaborates the basic situation and teaching characteristics of the Department of Architecture of Taiwan's Chenggong University, Donghai University, Tanjiang University, Zhongyuan University, Taipei University of Science and Technology and the University of practice. The fifth chapter introduces the important figures in the development of architecture education in Taiwan. They are Jin Changming, Han Baode and Fu Chaoqing. Finally, the conclusion of this paper lists and analyzes the existing problems of architecture education in mainland China, compares and studies with the architectural education of Taiwan University Department, and summarizes the aspects of architectural education in mainland China that need to be used for reference in Taiwan architecture education. It is hoped that more scholars will pay more attention to the architectural education in the mainland and look forward to the architectural education in the future. The appendix is an interview with the scholars in the field of Taiwan architecture education in order to understand the architectural education in Taiwan from the point of view of the local people.
【學位授予單位】：天津大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：TU-4;G642

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 季元振;關(guān)于對我國建筑專業(yè)學生的技術(shù)素質(zhì)培養(yǎng)的意見[J];建筑學報;2000年06期

2 王建國;中國建筑教育發(fā)展走向初探[J];建筑學報;2004年02期

3 丁沃沃;重新思考中國的建筑教育[J];建筑學報;2004年02期

4 仲德昆;屠蘇南;;新時期新發(fā)展——中國建筑教育的再思考[J];建筑學報;2005年12期

5 鮑家聲;建筑教育發(fā)展與改革[J];新建筑;2000年01期

6 隋杰禮,王少伶;探究引起當前中國建筑教育思想變革的因素[J];新建筑;2001年04期

7 夏鑄九;;一個批判性回顧與展望——臺灣大學建筑與城鄉(xiāng)研究所教研實踐[J];新建筑;2007年06期

本文編號：1807985