本文選題：大學(xué)治理　切入點：學(xué)術(shù)開展　出處：《山西大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：伴隨大學(xué)從社會邊緣日益走向社會中心,一直以來被尊崇信奉“學(xué)者行會自己管理自己事情”的西方大學(xué)自治理念開始受到了質(zhì)疑和追問,大學(xué)自治的管理模式受到空前挑戰(zhàn)。20世紀(jì)90年代以后,不管在社會管理領(lǐng)域或大學(xué)管理領(lǐng)域,合作化思潮影響擴大。大學(xué)自治內(nèi)涵受這個思潮影響也開始產(chǎn)生了新變化,由于現(xiàn)代大學(xué)已經(jīng)走出象牙塔,成為社會軸心機構(gòu),大學(xué)不再以堅決不受任何外來干涉作為大學(xué)自治目標(biāo)。另一方面,社會經(jīng)濟(jì)政治文化等各個方面發(fā)展如此迅速,知識在社會中的地位越來越重要,大學(xué)作為傳播高深知識的場所,必須肩負(fù)起其社會責(zé)任和歷史的使命,因此,大學(xué)由自治走向治理成為現(xiàn)代大學(xué)的必然選擇。 大學(xué)治理是新形式的大學(xué)自治,本文分別在對中世紀(jì)大學(xué)自治觀、近代大學(xué)自治觀進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)分析和探討的基礎(chǔ)上,主要采取歷史分析法,并以當(dāng)前社會環(huán)境變化發(fā)展為背景提出了現(xiàn)代大學(xué)新型治理觀�，F(xiàn)代意義上的治理主要有四個特征：治理是協(xié)調(diào)而不是控制；治理強調(diào)主體多樣性；治理強調(diào)政府與公民的合作以及政府服務(wù)；治理是一種持續(xù)不斷的互動。 以大學(xué)治理觀為背景開展學(xué)術(shù)研究,通過新型大學(xué)治理框架的結(jié)構(gòu)分析,首先是關(guān)注大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)的“學(xué)術(shù)自治”、“學(xué)術(shù)自由”、“教授治校”等經(jīng)典傳承精神。學(xué)術(shù)自治是高深學(xué)問最悠久的傳統(tǒng)之一；學(xué)術(shù)自由乃學(xué)術(shù)之基本精神,是一切學(xué)術(shù)活動得以開展的指導(dǎo)思想。而“教授治校”在當(dāng)代也有了新的發(fā)展內(nèi)涵,本文從教授對于大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)的意義、教授治校為大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)活動筑起屏障、教授治校與學(xué)術(shù)活動“去行政化”三個方面來論述。隨著社會的發(fā)展,大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)的一些新理念涌現(xiàn)出來,如開展國際交流與合作理念的興起；大眾化理念的興起；跨學(xué)科理念的興起；服務(wù)社會理念的興起。 本文中大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)主要指圍繞著高深學(xué)問體現(xiàn)大學(xué)職能的教學(xué)、科研、服務(wù)社會活動。大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)開展的特征作為了本文的重點來論述,隨著社會的發(fā)展,大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)也呈現(xiàn)出了一些新的特征,如本文通過學(xué)術(shù)要遵循高等教育規(guī)律、學(xué)術(shù)要服務(wù)政治社會、學(xué)術(shù)要重視教育教學(xué)、學(xué)術(shù)要重視探究性意義、學(xué)術(shù)要尊重自由精神這五個方面來闡述。對于大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)的保障,首先是建立良好的法人治理機構(gòu),其次是要保證教師在學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)利中的首要地位。
[Abstract]:With the increasing trend of universities from the edge of society to the center of society, the concept of autonomy of western universities, which has been respected and believed in "scholars' associations manage their own affairs", has been questioned and questioned. The management mode of university autonomy has been confronted with unprecedented challenges since the 1990s. Whether in the field of social management or in the field of university management, the influence of cooperative ideological trend has been expanded, and the connotation of university autonomy has also begun to produce new changes under the influence of this trend of thought. Since modern universities have stepped out of the ivory tower and become the axis of society, universities no longer have a determined goal of autonomy without any outside interference. On the other hand, social, economic, political, cultural and other aspects have developed so rapidly. Knowledge is becoming more and more important in society. As a place to spread advanced knowledge, universities must shoulder their social responsibility and historical mission. Therefore, universities from autonomy to governance become the inevitable choice of modern universities. University governance is a new form of university autonomy. Based on the systematic analysis and discussion of medieval and modern university autonomy, this paper mainly adopts the historical analysis method. Based on the development of the current social environment, this paper puts forward a new concept of governance in modern universities. There are four main features of governance in modern sense: governance is coordination rather than control, governance emphasizes the diversity of subjects; Governance emphasizes government-citizen cooperation and government services; governance is a continuous interaction. With the view of university governance as the background to carry out academic research, through the structure of the new university governance framework analysis, The first is to pay attention to the classical inheritance spirit of "academic autonomy", "academic freedom" and "professor governing school". Academic autonomy is one of the oldest traditions of advanced learning, and academic freedom is the basic spirit of learning. It is the guiding ideology that all academic activities can be carried out. And "Professor governing the school" also has new development connotation in the contemporary era. This article builds the barrier for the university academic activity from the significance of professor to university academic. With the development of the society, some new ideas of university academic emerged, such as the idea of international exchange and cooperation, the rise of popular idea, the development of international exchange and cooperation, the development of international cooperation, the development of international cooperation and the development of international cooperation. The rise of the concept of cross-discipline; the rise of the concept of service society. In this paper, the characteristics of university academic development are discussed as the key points of this paper. With the development of society, the characteristics of university academic development mainly refer to the teaching, scientific research, and service social activities of university functions around advanced knowledge. There are also some new features in academic studies. For example, this thesis should follow the law of higher education, serve the political society, attach importance to education and teaching, and attach importance to the significance of inquiry. Academic should respect the spirit of freedom these five aspects to expound. For the guarantee of university academic, firstly, it is to establish a good organization of corporate governance, and secondly, to ensure the primacy of teachers in academic rights.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G644

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李福華;尹增剛;;論大學(xué)治理的理論基礎(chǔ)——國際視野中的多學(xué)科觀點[J];比較教育研究;2007年09期

2 張斌賢,孫益;西歐中世紀(jì)大學(xué)的特權(quán)[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年04期

3 李兵,張艷輝;布魯貝克的高等教育哲學(xué)觀——在沖突中趨向平衡[J];大連教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年02期

4 劉獻(xiàn)君;張俊超;吳洪富;;大學(xué)教師對于教學(xué)與科研關(guān)系的認(rèn)識和處理調(diào)查研究[J];高等工程教育研究;2010年02期

5 馬鳳岐;大學(xué)自治與學(xué)術(shù)自由[J];高教探索;2004年04期

6 鄧光平;如何識讀現(xiàn)代大學(xué)組織特性——羅伯特·伯恩鮑姆的大學(xué)組織結(jié)構(gòu)觀[J];復(fù)旦教育論壇;2005年02期

7 李峻;;論高等教育的獨立性[J];復(fù)旦教育論壇;2007年04期

8 范文曜;;聚焦高等教育治理改革[J];復(fù)旦教育論壇;2008年03期

9 畢憲順,楊海山,王艷明;高校學(xué)術(shù)人員參與管理和決策的調(diào)查與研究[J];高等教育研究;2005年04期

10 龔怡祖;;大學(xué)治理結(jié)構(gòu):建立大學(xué)變化中的力量平衡——從理論思考到政策行動[J];高等教育研究;2010年12期

，

本文編號：1698898