本文選題：大學(xué)生　切入點：時間管理能力　出處：《上海師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目前，沒有針對大學(xué)生群體的時間管理能力的權(quán)威測量工具對大學(xué)生時間管理能力水平進(jìn)行客觀評價，所以編制大學(xué)生時間管理能力問卷，可用以了解大學(xué)生的時間管理現(xiàn)狀，發(fā)現(xiàn)大學(xué)生在時間管理方面存在的問題，并在此基礎(chǔ)上總結(jié)不同類型大學(xué)生時間管理能力上的差異并淺探制約因素，還可以預(yù)測大學(xué)生時間管理能力上有缺陷的消極后果，以此來為教育者提出更有針對性的對策幫助大學(xué)生提高時間管理能力。研究在理論和實踐方面都有重要的意義。 在文獻(xiàn)研究以及開放式問卷調(diào)查的基礎(chǔ)上構(gòu)建了《大學(xué)生時間管理能力問卷》的初始問卷。通過一次預(yù)測和二次預(yù)測，分別對數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行項目分析和因素分析，兩輪刪題后形成最終問卷，并考察問卷信效度，而后將問卷初步應(yīng)用，對646名大學(xué)生被試施測，實證研究結(jié)果加以統(tǒng)計學(xué)方法分析調(diào)查了大學(xué)生群體時間管理能力現(xiàn)狀。研究成果如下： （1）立足于大學(xué)生的時間管理能力狀況，并參考相關(guān)的研究成果，依據(jù)科學(xué)的統(tǒng)計分析方法編制出一份測量指標(biāo)較好的，可以測量大學(xué)生時間管理能力水平的問卷。 （2）自編《大學(xué)生時間管理能力問卷》有39個項目，包含兩個維度“個體時間管理行為”和“個體時間管理意識”。其中一個維度“個體時間管理行為”包含五個子維度“明確目標(biāo)、制定計劃、高效執(zhí)行”，“合理安排時間”，“做事規(guī)律有條理”，“靈活掌控時間”，“守時”；另一個維度“個體時間管理意識”包含三個子維度“時間觀念”，“自律性”，“自覺性”。 （3）大學(xué)生時間管理能力總體處于中等水平，大學(xué)生有較強個體時間管理意識，但到真正將個體時間管理意思付諸行動還有一定差距。 （4）男生比女生在個體時間管理行為這一維度中“合理分配時間“、“明確目標(biāo)、制定計劃、高效執(zhí)行”和“守時”等子維度上這三項能力要顯著優(yōu)于女大學(xué)生，其他方面兩者無顯著差異。 （5）外地學(xué)生在個體時間管理行為這一維度中“靈活掌控時間”子維度這一項能力要顯著強于上海學(xué)生，其他方面兩者無顯著差異。 （6）文科學(xué)生學(xué)生在個體時間管理行為這一維度中“明確目標(biāo)、制定計劃、高效執(zhí)行”子維度這一項能力要顯著高于理工科學(xué)生，而理工科學(xué)生在個體時間管理行為這一維度中“合理分配時間能力”子維度這一項能力上要顯著優(yōu)于文科學(xué)生，其他方面兩者無顯著差異。 （7）學(xué)生干部時間管理能力總體顯著高于普通學(xué)生，尤其體現(xiàn)在個體時間管理行為這一維度中“靈活掌控時間”子維度這一項以及個體時間管理意識“時間觀念”子維度這一項能力上。 （8）大三學(xué)生時間管理能力顯著高于其他各年級學(xué)生；大二學(xué)生總體時間管理能力，，特別是在個體時間管理意識維度上顯著低于其他各年級學(xué)生。 （9）不同類型學(xué)校的大學(xué)生總分及各因子分上無顯著性差異。說明不同類型的學(xué)校大學(xué)生時間管理能力無明顯差異。
[Abstract]:At present, no authoritative measurement tools for the college students time management and ability to objectively evaluate the students' time management ability, so the preparation of College Students' ability of time management questionnaire can be used to understand the current situation of time management of college students, found that college students are in the time management problems, and on the basis of summarizing differences between different types of College Students' time management ability and of the constraints, can also predict the negative consequences of defects on time management ability of college students, in order to provide educators propose more targeted countermeasures to help students improve the ability of time management. The research is of important significance in both theory and practice.
On the basis of literature research and open questionnaire was constructed on the initial questionnaire of college students time management ability of < >. Through a questionnaire and forecast two forecasts, respectively, item analysis and factor analysis of the data, delete the two questions form the final questionnaire, and examine the reliability and validity of the questionnaire, and then the preliminary application of the questionnaire. 646 college students were tested with the results of empirical research, statistical methods to survey and analysis of college students time management ability. The research results are as follows:
(1) based on the time management ability of college students, and referring to the related research results, a questionnaire with good measurement index and time management ability is compiled according to the scientific statistical analysis method.
(2) college students' ability of self "time management questionnaire > 39 items, including two dimensions of individual time management behavior" and "individual consciousness of time management". One of the dimensions of "individual time management behavior" includes five dimensions of "clear objectives, planning, effective implementation", "reasonable time", "the law of things organized", "flexible control time", "punctuality"; another dimension of "individual consciousness of time management" includes three dimensions of "time concept", "autonomy", "consciousness".
(3) college students' time management ability is generally at a medium level. College students have strong sense of individual time management, but there is still a gap between them.
(4) boys and girls in the dimension of individual time management behavior, such as "reasonable allocation of time", "clear goals, making plans, effective implementation" and "punctuality" and other sub dimensions, these three abilities are significantly better than those of female college students, but there is no significant difference in other aspects.
(5) in the dimension of individual time management behavior, the ability of "flexible control time" sub dimension is significantly stronger than that of Shanghai students, but there is no significant difference between other students.
(6) the students of liberal arts students in the dimensions of individual time management behavior of "clear objectives, planning, effective implementation" sub dimensions of this ability is significantly higher than that of students of science and technology, and science and engineering students in the dimensions of individual time management behavior in a reasonable allocation of time "sub dimension of this one ability the students are significantly better than the liberal arts, there was no significant difference between the other two.
(7) the time management ability of student cadres is significantly higher than that of ordinary students, especially in the dimension of individual time management behavior, which is the sub dimension of "flexible control time" and the ability of "time concept" sub dimension of individual time management consciousness.
(8) the time management ability of junior college students is significantly higher than that of all other grades. The total time management ability of sophomores is significantly lower than that of all other grades, especially in the sense of individual time management.
(9) there is no significant difference between the total scores and the factors of different types of college students. It shows that there is no significant difference in the time management ability of different types of college students.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G641

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 教育部《大學(xué)生心理健康測評系統(tǒng)》課題組 ,鄭日昌,鄧麗芳,張忠華,郭召良;《中國大學(xué)生心理健康量表》的編制[J];心理與行為研究;2005年02期

2 房安榮,蔣文清,王和平,杜曉新;學(xué)困生與學(xué)優(yōu)生學(xué)習(xí)時間管理能力的對比研究[J];外國中小學(xué)教育;2003年04期

3 古玉,譚小宏;大學(xué)生時間管理傾向與自信的相關(guān)研究[J];西南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2004年04期

4 畢重增;彭香萍;;拖延:時間管理傾向量表的區(qū)分效度[J];西南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2005年06期

5 鄭劍虹;黃希庭;;當(dāng)代大學(xué)生自強意識特點及影響因素研究[J];西南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期

6 鐘慧;大學(xué)生時間管理傾向與成就動機的相關(guān)研究[J];心理科學(xué);2003年04期

7 黃希庭,張志杰;青少年時間管理傾向量表的編制[J];心理學(xué)報;2001年04期

8 秦啟文,張志杰;時間管理傾向與生活質(zhì)量關(guān)系的調(diào)查研究[J];心理學(xué)探新;2002年04期

9 阮昆良;中學(xué)生心理控制源和時間管理傾向的相關(guān)研究[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2004年02期

10 狄敏,黃希庭,張永紅;大學(xué)生時間管理傾向和A型人格的關(guān)系研究[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2004年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 袁湄;大學(xué)生時間管理行為研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2006年

2 劉偉芳;大學(xué)生自我概念與應(yīng)對方式、人際信任的關(guān)系研究[D];安徽師范大學(xué);2006年

3 羅香群;大學(xué)生責(zé)任心問卷的編制與應(yīng)用研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2007年

本文編號：1641650