本文關(guān)鍵詞：從“被中產(chǎn)”到“被消失的中產(chǎn)”：G市高校教師群體的住宅福利與階層認(rèn)同　出處：《華東理工大學(xué)》2012年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 中產(chǎn)階級 住宅福利 階層認(rèn)同 住宅政策

【摘要】：居住是貫穿人生一輩子福利的基礎(chǔ)。在北歐有這樣的說法：福利從住宅開始,以住宅結(jié)束。沒有良好的住宅福利,其他福利也就無從談起。住宅福利已然重要,但中國城市中產(chǎn)階級住宅福利的提升之路卻一如“中產(chǎn)階級”這一哲學(xué)存在,充滿了不確定性和諸多的爭議。 雖然國家和政府以“住有所居”為政策目標(biāo)構(gòu)想,通過各種具體住宅社會政策的實施,借助住宅商品化改革進程的推進,提升了整個國民的住宅福利水平。但是,從當(dāng)前住宅政策的受惠群體來看,“夾心層”的存在也是不爭的社會事實。當(dāng)高收入群體可以從商品化住宅政策中獲益,低收入群體可以獲得保障性住房等政策性扶持時,中產(chǎn)階級則游離于政策體系之外。 “一套房子消滅一個中產(chǎn)階級”已經(jīng)不再是簡單的媒體命題,“中產(chǎn)的消逝”與“M型社會的來臨”也不再是社會預(yù)言家的危言聳聽。為何中國的城市中產(chǎn)階級莫名奇妙地成了“夾心層”?在突然“被中產(chǎn)”到一夜之間成為“被消失的中產(chǎn)”過程中是否存在著與住宅福利相連的某種玄機?本研究始于這一連串的質(zhì)疑,旨在發(fā)現(xiàn)中產(chǎn)階級住宅福利與階層認(rèn)同之間的邏輯關(guān)聯(lián),在解決這些疑問的過程中探索提升中產(chǎn)階級住宅福利和階層認(rèn)同的可行之路。 對于中產(chǎn)階級概念的選取和界定是開展研究的第一步,這也成為了論文立意的基點,不是從單一的收入等級,而是從社會分層的角度去探討住宅福利的分化狀態(tài),從而擇取更能表征“社會中間層”復(fù)合內(nèi)涵的“中產(chǎn)階級”為研究對象,在具體的實證中,以G市高校教師群體為分析單位,用質(zhì)性研究的方法探索其住宅福利與階層認(rèn)同之間的邏輯關(guān)聯(lián)。選用“住宅”而非“住房”來匹配“福利”一詞則更多地體現(xiàn)了筆者對于福利內(nèi)涵所指向的普遍福利的美好愿景,將住宅福利置于比“住房保障”一詞更廣闊的政策空間之中,這也更切合中產(chǎn)階級當(dāng)前的現(xiàn)實居住狀態(tài)。 整個研究的邏輯過程如下：選取社會結(jié)構(gòu)中的特定階層,了解其“被中產(chǎn)”獲得階層身份的過程,關(guān)注其住宅福利困境,陳述住宅福利困境引發(fā)階層危機的風(fēng)險,然后著力于困境的解決和危機的消解之路。遵循著這樣的研究邏輯,論文在厘清概念之后,從住宅福利所體現(xiàn)的階層分化思路上去思考中產(chǎn)階級住宅福利的本質(zhì)特征,探索住宅福利與階層認(rèn)同之間可能存在的理論關(guān)聯(lián),形成理論假定和分析框架,并在理論框架的構(gòu)建過程中完成研究設(shè)計。 研究設(shè)計具有明顯的實證特色,每一個步驟都指向特定理論假設(shè)的校驗。在實證過程中：分析中產(chǎn)階級住宅福利現(xiàn)狀與住宅福利滿意度的數(shù)據(jù)；解讀中產(chǎn)階級個體行動者與住宅福利之間的建構(gòu)關(guān)系；探討通過職業(yè)中產(chǎn)階級住宅福利的本質(zhì)特征；考察住宅社會政策對于中產(chǎn)階級住宅福利的影響；形成中產(chǎn)階級住宅福利滿意度提升的回歸模型；展望中產(chǎn)階級住宅福利提升的可能途徑。在此過程中也說明了中產(chǎn)階級住宅福利提升的隱憂,對于住宅福利的代際傳遞現(xiàn)象進行了相應(yīng)的探析。 中產(chǎn)階級的住宅福利在本質(zhì)上是一種高基點的職業(yè)福利。中產(chǎn)階級住宅福利滿意程度會影響中產(chǎn)階級的職業(yè)認(rèn)同。良好的住宅福利是促進中產(chǎn)階級職業(yè)穩(wěn)定發(fā)展的前提。沒有住宅福利的提升,中產(chǎn)階級的階層認(rèn)同會受到?jīng)_擊,其階層結(jié)構(gòu)在城市發(fā)展中的地位會因住宅福利而下滑,階層的危機將因住宅福利的現(xiàn)實困境而蔓延。 整個研究的貢獻(xiàn)在于從社會分層的角度去考察住宅福利,通過實證了解中產(chǎn)階級的住宅福利現(xiàn)狀,驗證形成論文邏輯鏈條的理論假設(shè),最終形成可供參考的中產(chǎn)階級住宅福利提升路徑模型。只有通過將個體置身于群體/階層之中,才能從理論的角度建構(gòu)出中產(chǎn)階級的住宅福利特征。只有從階層的角度探討住宅福利與職業(yè)/階層認(rèn)同的關(guān)系,才會發(fā)現(xiàn)特定階層的住宅福利本質(zhì)及其與職業(yè)的重要關(guān)聯(lián)。同樣,也只有在宏觀社會經(jīng)濟發(fā)展背景中去尋找中產(chǎn)階級住宅福利提升的政策路徑,才能體現(xiàn)政策體系的空間與張力。
[Abstract]:Living is the foundation of life throughout a lifetime in the Nordic welfare. There is such a saying: welfare from residential, residential to the end. No good housing benefits, other benefits will be lost. Residential welfare already important, but China city middle class residential welfare promotion road as the "middle class" this philosophy there is full of uncertainty and many disputes.
Although the state and the government in the "housing" policy goal, through the implementation of specific social housing policy, with the process of commercialization reform to promote housing, and enhance the national residential welfare level. However, from the current housing policy will benefit, "sandwich" is an indisputable social existence the fact. When high income groups can benefit from the commercialization of housing policy, low-income groups can obtain affordable housing policy support, the middle class is free from the policy system.
"A house to destroy a middle class" is no longer a simple media proposition, "the middle dies" and "M type society" is no longer a social prophet alarmist. Why Chinese city middle class inexplicably became the "sandwich layer" in the "middle class"? Suddenly to the night become "the existence of middle process was the disappearance of a mystery is connected with the housing welfare? This research begins with this series of questions, to find the logical relationship between the middle class residential welfare and class identity, in addressing these questions in the process of exploring enhance the middle-class residential welfare and class identity feasible way.
The middle class concept selection and definition is the first step to carry out research, which has become the basis of this paper, not only from the income level, but from the perspective of social stratification to explore residential welfare state of differentiation, thus selecting better characterization "social middle layer composite connotation of the" middle class "for the study the object in the real, to university teachers in G city as the unit of analysis, explore the logic relation between the residential welfare and class identity with the method of qualitative research. The" residential "and" non housing "," welfare "is more of a better vision of the general welfare pointing to the connotation of the welfare, welfare residential above" housing security "is a term more broad policy space, which is more in line with the current state of the middle class living reality.
The logic of the whole process of the research are as follows: select a specific class in the social structure, to understand the "process of middle class identity", pay attention to the housing welfare predicament, statements of risk residential welfare difficulties caused by the class of the crisis, and then focus on the plight of the digestion solution and the crisis of the road. Follow this logic of the research paper. To clarify the concept, way up from the residential stratification reflects the welfare thinking essential characteristics of middle-class housing welfare, to explore the possible correlation between residential welfare theory and class identity, the formation of theoretical assumptions and analytical framework, and complete the research design in the process of building the theoretical framework.
Has the obvious characteristics of empirical research design, each step to check specific theoretical assumptions. In the empirical process: analysis of present situation of residential and residential middle-class welfare welfare satisfaction data; and establishment of individual actors between the middle class and Housing Welfare Department; explore the essential characteristics of middle class residential occupation welfare; investigation residential social policies for middle-class residential welfare; the formation of the middle class regression model to promote housing welfare satisfaction; possible prospect of middle-class residential welfare. This process also shows that the middle class residential welfare worries, for intergenerational residential welfare transfer phenomenon in the corresponding analysis.
The middle class residential welfare is a high base point of occupation welfare in nature. The middle class residential welfare satisfaction will affect the occupation identity of the middle class. Good housing welfare is a prerequisite for promoting the stable development of the middle class occupation. No residential welfare promotion, the middle class of the class identity will be affected, its position class structure in the development of the city will be due to the decline in housing welfare, class crisis because of the reality of the plight of welfare housing spread.
The whole thesis contributes to study residential welfare from the perspective of social stratification, understand the status quo of middle-class residential welfare through the empirical study, to verify the hypothesis formation of the logic chain, eventually forming a path model of middle-class residential welfare promotion for reference. Only by the individual in group / class, to build a residential welfare the characteristics of the middle class from the perspective of theory. Only the relationship between residential welfare and occupation / class identity from the angle of the stratum, will find the specific sectors of the housing welfare nature and the importance of occupation and association. Also, only in the macro background of social and economic development for the middle class housing welfare policy path of ascension, to show space and tension policy system.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G645.1;D663

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王春華;;探索保障性住房的未來模式[J];北京房地產(chǎn);2008年10期

2 ;姜偉新:建立和完善中國住房政策體系[J];中華建設(shè);2008年03期

3 徐鳳臣;徐翔;;我國房改30年理論嬗變[J];城市;2008年08期

4 周靜;;借鑒荷蘭經(jīng)驗構(gòu)建我國大城市社會住房體系[J];城市環(huán)境設(shè)計;2008年06期

5 陳燕,林炳耀;福利國家英國的住房政策[J];城市問題;2003年02期

6 孫斌棟;劉學(xué)良;;美國混合居住政策及其效應(yīng)的研究述評——兼論對我國經(jīng)濟適用房和廉租房規(guī)劃建設(shè)的啟示[J];城市規(guī)劃學(xué)刊;2009年01期

7 李維哲,謝經(jīng)榮;澳大利亞住房發(fā)展管窺[J];城鄉(xiāng)建設(shè);2003年06期

8 李小寧;;新加坡的住宅保障制度[J];城鄉(xiāng)建設(shè);2008年02期

9 陶雪良;劉洪玉;;城市公共住房政策的起因與歸結(jié)[J];財政研究;2008年09期

10 李季平;;我國住房改革政策正面臨著第二次扭曲[J];東北之窗;2008年06期

，

本文編號：1420154