【摘要】：在信息技術(shù)的發(fā)展以及終身教育理念的推動(dòng)下,網(wǎng)上免費(fèi)學(xué)習(xí)資源得到了人們的重視,在線學(xué)習(xí)成為人們實(shí)現(xiàn)自我教育的重要方式之一。為了促進(jìn)教育公平,大量?jī)?yōu)質(zhì)課程資源的免費(fèi)開(kāi)放,大規(guī)模開(kāi)放在線課程(MOOC)作為網(wǎng)絡(luò)課程的一種新形式應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。隨著MOOC平臺(tái)以及課程越來(lái)越多,MOOC課程良莠不齊,課程質(zhì)量問(wèn)題日益突出,隨之引起各界人士的關(guān)注與批評(píng)。雖然以往的研究中對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)課程的評(píng)價(jià)有很多的評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及指標(biāo)體系,但是由于MOOC的獨(dú)特性,以往的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系已經(jīng)不能完全適應(yīng)MOOC的課程評(píng)價(jià),尤其是在學(xué)習(xí)者的用戶體驗(yàn)方面有所欠缺。好的MOOC應(yīng)該有良好的用戶體驗(yàn),吸引大量的用戶參與其中并且能持續(xù)學(xué)習(xí),因此本研究力圖從MOOC用戶的視角建立一套MOOC的課程評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。本研究運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)法對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行梳理,參考國(guó)內(nèi)外較權(quán)威的在線課程評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,對(duì)用戶進(jìn)行問(wèn)卷調(diào)查和訪談進(jìn)一步篩選MOOC課程評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)項(xiàng),通過(guò)德?tīng)柗品�、層次分析法確定MOOC評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)權(quán)重,最后形成MOOC課程評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。該評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系包括感官體驗(yàn)、行為體驗(yàn)、情感體驗(yàn)、內(nèi)容體驗(yàn)以及關(guān)聯(lián)體驗(yàn)5個(gè)維度、10個(gè)二級(jí)指標(biāo)以及48個(gè)三級(jí)指標(biāo),然后確定每項(xiàng)指標(biāo)的權(quán)重以及評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),最后驗(yàn)證評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的信效度。研究結(jié)果顯示,MOOC用戶對(duì)界面設(shè)計(jì)以及多媒體呈現(xiàn)形式有著較高的要求,視頻內(nèi)容在課程中起著核心的作用,在三級(jí)指標(biāo)中,師生互動(dòng)以及生生互動(dòng)是影響課程是否帶來(lái)良好體驗(yàn)的重要因素。后續(xù)研究需要對(duì)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系應(yīng)用到若干課程評(píng)價(jià)中進(jìn)行有效性驗(yàn)證,以便不斷地優(yōu)化完善評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。
[Abstract]:With the development of information technology and the promotion of life-long education concept, free online learning resources have been attached importance to, online learning has become one of the important ways to realize self-education. In order to promote the educational fairness and the free opening of a large number of high-quality curriculum resources, the large-scale open online curriculum (MOOC) emerged as a new form of online curriculum. With the increasing number of MOOC platforms and courses, the good and bad of MOOC courses are intermingled, and the problems of course quality are becoming more and more prominent, which has aroused the attention and criticism of people from all walks of life. Although there are a lot of evaluation criteria and index system in the past research, but because of the uniqueness of MOOC, the former evaluation index system can not fully adapt to the course evaluation of MOOC. In particular, there is a lack of user experience for learners. A good MOOC should have a good user experience, attract a large number of users to participate and continue to learn, so this study tries to establish a set of MOOC curriculum evaluation index system from the perspective of MOOC users. This research uses the literature method to comb the related literature at home and abroad, referring to the domestic and foreign more authoritative online course evaluation index system, carries on the questionnaire survey and the interview to the user to screen the MOOC curriculum appraisal index item further, through Delphi method, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) determines the weight of MOOC evaluation index, and finally forms the evaluation index system of MOOC curriculum. The evaluation index system includes 5 dimensions of sensory experience, behavioral experience, emotional experience, content experience and associated experience, 10 secondary indicators and 48 third-level indicators, and then determines the weight and evaluation criteria of each index. Finally, the reliability and validity of the evaluation index system are verified. The results show that MOOC users have high requirements for interface design and multimedia presentation. Video content plays a central role in the course. Teacher-student interaction and student-student interaction are the important factors that affect whether the curriculum brings good experience. In order to optimize and perfect the evaluation index system, it is necessary to verify the effectiveness of the evaluation index system applied to the evaluation of several courses.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G434

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李五洲;汪基德;;基于模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法的MOOC適切性研究——以“現(xiàn)代教育技術(shù)”課程為例[J];電化教育研究;2016年12期

2 蔡e，

本文編號(hào)：2285453