【摘要】：“教師配置更加合理”是國家深入推進(jìn)義務(wù)教育均衡發(fā)展的基本目標(biāo)。教師輪崗交流政策是優(yōu)化師資配置的一項重要舉措,教師輪崗交流不僅使得教師配置更加合理,還促進(jìn)了教師專業(yè)素質(zhì)的提高。2010年以來,揚州市啟動義務(wù)教育學(xué)校教師輪崗交流工作,各縣(市、區(qū))均制定了相應(yīng)的實施方案和辦法,教師輪崗交流工作取得初步成效并基本實現(xiàn)制度化和常態(tài)化。作為一項新政,揚州地區(qū)教師輪崗交流政策經(jīng)過幾年實踐,政策執(zhí)行存在諸多困境。首先,在政策制定上存在機(jī)械性,缺乏系統(tǒng)性、統(tǒng)一性,政策長效機(jī)制難以持續(xù),整體交流氛圍沒有形成;其次,在執(zhí)行主體上存在政府部門協(xié)作不力、學(xué)校校長責(zé)任不明、監(jiān)督管理措施偏軟不利因素,執(zhí)行效能亟待提高;第三,從目標(biāo)群體角度,少數(shù)教師大局意識不強(qiáng)、專業(yè)水平參差不齊,加之交流帶來的家庭實際困難增加,導(dǎo)致教師對交流存在負(fù)面情緒;第四,從環(huán)境因素看,城鄉(xiāng)硬軟件設(shè)施存在的差距、區(qū)域地理差異帶來的家庭等實際困難和社會固有偏見,形成了政策執(zhí)行的客觀阻力。在充分調(diào)查、分析和研究政策執(zhí)行困境的基礎(chǔ)上,本文針對性地提出了破解對策:一是通過明確政策導(dǎo)向、打破本位觀念、部門協(xié)作統(tǒng)籌等措施進(jìn)一步優(yōu)化和完善政策的系統(tǒng)性;二是通過明確行政主導(dǎo)權(quán)責(zé)、建立市級領(lǐng)導(dǎo)小組、落實校長職責(zé)責(zé)任、強(qiáng)化工作監(jiān)督問責(zé)等措施進(jìn)一步提高執(zhí)行主體的執(zhí)行能力;三是通過深入宣傳教育、加強(qiáng)業(yè)務(wù)培訓(xùn)、重視調(diào)研反饋等措施解決教師隊伍的思想、素質(zhì)、實際困難等阻力;四是通過出臺統(tǒng)一政策、健全保障體系、注重基礎(chǔ)投入等措施進(jìn)一步營造良好的政策執(zhí)行環(huán)境。本文借鑒史密斯政府執(zhí)行研究過程模型和公共政策執(zhí)行相關(guān)理論,對揚州地區(qū)教師輪崗交流政策及其執(zhí)行主體、目標(biāo)群體、環(huán)境等各因素的研究分析,找準(zhǔn)和剖析了政策執(zhí)行困境的主要原因,針對性地提出了破解對策,對揚州地區(qū)教師輪崗交流政策的進(jìn)一步完善,對教師輪崗交流制度的常態(tài)化、長期化,對輪崗交流政策執(zhí)行效能的提升將起到推進(jìn)作用。
[Abstract]:More reasonable allocation of teachers is the basic goal of promoting the balanced development of compulsory education. The exchange policy of teachers' rotation is an important measure to optimize the allocation of teachers. It not only makes the allocation of teachers more reasonable, but also promotes the improvement of teachers' professional quality. Yangzhou City started the exchange of teachers' posts in compulsory education schools. All counties (cities and districts) have formulated corresponding implementation plans and measures. The exchange of teachers' posts has achieved initial results and has basically been institutionalized and regularized. As a new policy, there are many difficulties in the implementation of Yangzhou teachers' post exchange policy after several years of practice. First of all, there are mechanical, lack of systematization and unity in policy formulation, the long-effect policy mechanism is not sustainable, and the overall atmosphere of communication has not formed; secondly, there is a lack of coordination between government departments and school principals on the executive body, and the responsibility of school principals is not clear. Third, from the perspective of the target group, a small number of teachers are not aware of the overall situation, the professional level is not uniform, coupled with the increase of the actual family difficulties caused by communication. It leads teachers to have negative emotions on communication. Fourthly, from the perspective of environmental factors, the gap between hardware and software facilities in urban and rural areas, the actual difficulties and inherent social prejudices brought about by regional geographical differences have formed the objective resistance to the implementation of policies. On the basis of full investigation, analysis and study of the dilemma of policy implementation, this paper puts forward countermeasures to solve the problem: first, by clarifying the policy direction, breaking the standard concept, Measures such as departmental coordination, and other measures to further optimize and improve the systematization of the policy; second, by clarifying the executive-led powers and responsibilities, establishing municipal leading groups, and carrying out the principal's responsibilities and responsibilities, Strengthening work supervision, accountability and other measures to further improve the executive ability of the main body; third, through in-depth publicity and education, strengthen professional training, pay attention to research and feedback and other measures to solve the ideological, quality, practical difficulties and other obstacles; Fourth, through the introduction of unified policies, sound security system, attention to basic investment and other measures to further create a good policy implementation environment. Based on the research process model of Smith government and the theory of public policy implementation, this paper analyzes the factors of Yangzhou teachers' rotation exchange policy, target group, environment and other factors, such as the exchange policy of teachers in Yangzhou, the target group, the environment and so on. This paper finds out and analyzes the main reasons for the difficult position of policy implementation, puts forward countermeasures to solve the problem, further consummates the policy of teacher rotation and exchange in Yangzhou, and normalizes and perpetuates the system of exchange of teachers' rotation of posts. On the post exchange policy implementation effectiveness will play a role in promoting.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G525.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 方征;謝辰;;“縣管校聘”教師流動政策的實施困境與改進(jìn)[J];教育發(fā)展研究;2016年08期

2 孫剛成;翟昕昕;;義務(wù)教育教師輪崗交流制度的困境及其對策[J];教學(xué)與管理;2016年09期

3 吳孟帥;;義務(wù)教育階段教師輪崗交流制度的影響及啟示[J];教育評論;2015年11期

4 黃波;;中小學(xué)教師交流政策的變化與特點——基于陜西省的教育政策研究[J];統(tǒng)計與管理;2015年10期

5 袁桂林;;如何防止城鄉(xiāng)教師交流輪崗制度空轉(zhuǎn)[J];探索與爭鳴;2015年09期

6 沈偉;孫天慈;;教師流動的政策工具設(shè)計與反思[J];全球教育展望;2015年09期

7 司曉宏;楊令平;;西部縣域校長教師交流輪崗政策執(zhí)行中的問題與對策[J];教育研究;2015年08期

8 華偉;繆建東;;教師為什么不愿流出名�！趯K省小學(xué)教師均衡發(fā)展的實證研究[J];上海教育科研;2015年07期

9 吳建濤;;義務(wù)教育教師流動政策進(jìn)展與完善路徑研究——基于教育局長的問卷調(diào)查與政策文本分析[J];中國教育學(xué)刊;2015年04期

10 汪小將;朱清芳;;基礎(chǔ)教育中“教師輪崗制”存在的問題及對策[J];內(nèi)江科技;2014年12期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 陳賢慧;教師輪崗交流中問題和改善策略的質(zhì)性研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

2 韓林;江蘇省洪澤縣義務(wù)教育教師輪崗交流的調(diào)查研究[D];淮北師范大學(xué);2015年

3 楊雪;縣域內(nèi)“教師輪崗政策”運行研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2015年

4 劉愛剛;城市化進(jìn)程中社區(qū)教育政策執(zhí)行主體偏差行為研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

5 姜先亮;義務(wù)教育均衡視野下城鄉(xiāng)教師流動問題研究[D];河北大學(xué);2013年

6 施麗華;Q市義務(wù)教育均衡發(fā)展政策執(zhí)行研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2013年

7 鄒穎;TL市實施“教師有序流動”中的問題及對策研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2012年

8 王保聲;縣域內(nèi)義務(wù)教育學(xué)校教師定期輪崗交流制度研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2012年

9 汪薇;教師輪崗政策執(zhí)行研究—政策工具的使用效果角度[D];華東師范大學(xué);2012年

10 歐陽蘭;我國公共政策執(zhí)行中目標(biāo)群體不服從現(xiàn)象研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：2270286