隔代親合與農(nóng)村留守青少年的抑郁、生活滿意度：逆境信念的中介作用
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-28 07:23
【摘要】：由于父母長期在外打工,農(nóng)村留守青少年長期生活在親子親情缺失的不利環(huán)境中。研究表明,農(nóng)村留守青少年的消極情緒水平顯著高于非留守青少年(Zhao,LiuWang,2015)。由于消極情緒的長期伴隨和累積會影響留守青少年的積極健康成長,揭示能夠降低留守青少年消極情緒的作用機(jī)制成為近年來研究者關(guān)注的重要主題。但是,越來越多的研究者認(rèn)識到心理健康不僅僅是沒有心理疾病,還應(yīng)包括高生活滿意度等積極心理健康狀態(tài)的擁有。因此,為更好的理解農(nóng)村留守青少年的心理健康水平,促進(jìn)其積極發(fā)展,本研究不僅探討降低農(nóng)村留守青少年消極情緒的保護(hù)機(jī)制,同時也對其積極情緒的保護(hù)因素及其作用機(jī)制進(jìn)行研究。由于父母長期在外打工,祖父母(外祖父母)成為農(nóng)村留守青少年尤其是雙親外出青少年的主要照料者,祖輩與青少年積極的情感聯(lián)結(jié)對留守青少年的積極適應(yīng)具有重要作用。因此,本研究選取雙親外出留守青少年作為樣本,關(guān)注隔代親合、逆境信念這兩個保護(hù)因素對其抑郁、生活滿意度的影響,并對這兩個保護(hù)因素的作用機(jī)制進(jìn)行探討。同時,本研究也將以非留守青少年群體作為對照組,探討兩類青少年在各變量及作用機(jī)制上可能存在的差異。采用隔代親合、逆境信念、抑郁與生活滿意度量表對204名雙親外出青少年和259名非留守青少年進(jìn)行了測查,考察了兩類青少年隔代親合、逆境信念、抑郁和生活滿意度的特點,檢驗了隔代親合對兩類青少年抑郁、生活滿意度的直接預(yù)測作用,探討了兩類青少年的逆境信念在隔代親合與抑郁、生活滿意度之間的中介作用機(jī)制及可能存在的差異。主要研究結(jié)果如下:1.雙親外出青少年與非留守青少年在逆境信念水平上存在差異,非留守青少年的逆境信念水平顯著高于雙親外出青少年;雙親外出青少年與非留守青少年在隔代親合、抑郁及生活滿意度水平上不存在顯著差異。2.在雙親外出青少年群體和非留守青少年群體中,隔代親合與抑郁均呈顯著負(fù)相關(guān),與生活滿意度均呈顯著正相關(guān);隔代親合與逆境信念均呈顯著正相關(guān);逆境信念與抑郁呈均呈顯著負(fù)相關(guān),與生活滿意度呈顯著正相關(guān)。3.隔代親合能顯著負(fù)向預(yù)測雙親外出青少年和非留守青少年的抑郁水平,即隔代親合水平越高,兩類青少年的抑郁水平越低;隔代親合能顯著正向預(yù)測雙親外出青少年和非留守青少年的生活滿意度水平,即隔代親合水平越高,兩類青少年的生活滿意度水平越高。進(jìn)一步研究發(fā)現(xiàn),隔代親合對雙親外出青少年抑郁、生活滿意度的直接預(yù)測作用高于非留守青少年。4.逆境信念在隔代親合與抑郁之間存在中介作用;逆境信念在隔代親合與生活滿意度之間也存在中介作用。5.逆境信念在隔代親合與抑郁之間的中介作用存在留守類別差異。留守類別差異均表現(xiàn)在隔代親合對逆境信念的預(yù)測路徑上,即雙親外出青少年的隔代親合對逆境信念的影響大于非留守青少年,隔代親合對雙親外出青少年逆境信念的提升作用更大。6.在雙親外出青少年和非留守青少年群體中分別對逆境信念在隔代親合與生活滿意度之間的中介模型進(jìn)行檢驗,發(fā)現(xiàn)在兩個群體中逆境信念僅能邊緣顯著預(yù)測生活滿意度;并且逆境信念的中介效應(yīng)在兩個群體中均沒有達(dá)到顯著水平。
[Abstract]:Because the parents have long been working outside, the young people in rural areas have long lived in the adverse environment of the lack of parents and relatives. The study shows that the negative emotional level of the young people in rural areas is significantly higher than that of the non left behind adolescents (Zhao, LiuWang, 2015). However, more and more researchers have realized that mental health is not only without psychological disease, but also should include positive mental health status such as high life satisfaction. Therefore, to better understand the youth left behind in rural areas. This study not only discusses the protection mechanism of reducing the negative emotions of the young left behind in rural areas, but also studies the protective factors and mechanisms of their positive emotions. The main caregivers of young people, the positive emotional link between the grandparents and the youngsters plays an important role in the active adaptation of the youngsters. Therefore, this study chooses the parents of the parents to stay away as a sample, and pays attention to the influence of the two protective factors on their depression and life satisfaction, and the two protective factors. At the same time, the study will also take the non retained youth group as the control group to explore the possible differences between the two types of adolescents in each variable and the mechanism of action. 204 adolescents and 259 non retained adolescents were measured by the intergenerational affinity, adversity belief, depression and life satisfaction scale. We examined the characteristics of two types of adolescents' intergeneration, adversity belief, depression and life satisfaction, and examined the direct prediction of two types of adolescent depression and life satisfaction, and discussed the mediating mechanism and the possible difference between the adversity belief of two types of adolescents in the intergeneration and depression and the life satisfaction. The main results are as follows: 1. there is a difference in the level of adversity belief between the teenagers and the non staying young people, and the level of adversity belief is significantly higher than that of the two parents, and there is no significant difference in the level of depression and life satisfaction between the two parents and those of the non left behind adolescents. There was significant negative correlation and positive correlation with life satisfaction, and there was a significant positive correlation between intergeneration and adversity belief, and there was a significant negative correlation between adversity belief and depression, and a significant positive correlation with survival satisfaction in.3. generation was significant. The higher the level of depression, the higher the level of Intergeneration affinity, the lower the level of depression in the two types of adolescents, the higher the level of life satisfaction, the higher the level of Intergeneration affinity and the life satisfaction water of the two types of adolescents. Further studies have found that the direct prediction of depression and life satisfaction is higher than that of non left behind adolescents..4. adversity belief has a mediating role in the intergeneration and depression, while adversity belief has a mediating role of.5. adversity belief in the next generation. The difference in the mediating role of combination and depression exists in the left behind category. The differences in the retention category are all manifested in the prediction path of the adversity belief, that is, the influence of the next generation of parents on the adversity belief is greater than that of the non left behind teenagers, and the promotion effect of the next generation of parents on the adversity belief of the two parents is greater in.6.. The mediating model of adversity belief and life satisfaction was tested among the adolescents and non staying adolescents. It was found that adversity belief could only predict life satisfaction in the two groups, and the mediating effect of adversity belief did not reach a significant level in the two groups.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B844.2
本文編號：2149337
[Abstract]:Because the parents have long been working outside, the young people in rural areas have long lived in the adverse environment of the lack of parents and relatives. The study shows that the negative emotional level of the young people in rural areas is significantly higher than that of the non left behind adolescents (Zhao, LiuWang, 2015). However, more and more researchers have realized that mental health is not only without psychological disease, but also should include positive mental health status such as high life satisfaction. Therefore, to better understand the youth left behind in rural areas. This study not only discusses the protection mechanism of reducing the negative emotions of the young left behind in rural areas, but also studies the protective factors and mechanisms of their positive emotions. The main caregivers of young people, the positive emotional link between the grandparents and the youngsters plays an important role in the active adaptation of the youngsters. Therefore, this study chooses the parents of the parents to stay away as a sample, and pays attention to the influence of the two protective factors on their depression and life satisfaction, and the two protective factors. At the same time, the study will also take the non retained youth group as the control group to explore the possible differences between the two types of adolescents in each variable and the mechanism of action. 204 adolescents and 259 non retained adolescents were measured by the intergenerational affinity, adversity belief, depression and life satisfaction scale. We examined the characteristics of two types of adolescents' intergeneration, adversity belief, depression and life satisfaction, and examined the direct prediction of two types of adolescent depression and life satisfaction, and discussed the mediating mechanism and the possible difference between the adversity belief of two types of adolescents in the intergeneration and depression and the life satisfaction. The main results are as follows: 1. there is a difference in the level of adversity belief between the teenagers and the non staying young people, and the level of adversity belief is significantly higher than that of the two parents, and there is no significant difference in the level of depression and life satisfaction between the two parents and those of the non left behind adolescents. There was significant negative correlation and positive correlation with life satisfaction, and there was a significant positive correlation between intergeneration and adversity belief, and there was a significant negative correlation between adversity belief and depression, and a significant positive correlation with survival satisfaction in.3. generation was significant. The higher the level of depression, the higher the level of Intergeneration affinity, the lower the level of depression in the two types of adolescents, the higher the level of life satisfaction, the higher the level of Intergeneration affinity and the life satisfaction water of the two types of adolescents. Further studies have found that the direct prediction of depression and life satisfaction is higher than that of non left behind adolescents..4. adversity belief has a mediating role in the intergeneration and depression, while adversity belief has a mediating role of.5. adversity belief in the next generation. The difference in the mediating role of combination and depression exists in the left behind category. The differences in the retention category are all manifested in the prediction path of the adversity belief, that is, the influence of the next generation of parents on the adversity belief is greater than that of the non left behind teenagers, and the promotion effect of the next generation of parents on the adversity belief of the two parents is greater in.6.. The mediating model of adversity belief and life satisfaction was tested among the adolescents and non staying adolescents. It was found that adversity belief could only predict life satisfaction in the two groups, and the mediating effect of adversity belief did not reach a significant level in the two groups.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B844.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 趙景欣;張婷;林玲玉;;隔代親合與農(nóng)村留守兒童的抑郁:留守?zé)⿶勒J(rèn)知評價的中介作用[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2016年06期
2 李白璐;邊玉芳;;初中生生活滿意度的發(fā)展趨勢及社會支持、自尊的影響:一項3年追蹤研究[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2016年05期
3 魏軍鋒;;留守兒童的社會支持與生活滿意度——希望與應(yīng)對方式的多重中介效應(yīng)[J];中國心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2015年05期
4 張莉;王乾宇;趙景欣;;養(yǎng)育者支持、逆境信念與農(nóng)村留守兒童孤獨(dú)感的關(guān)系[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2014年02期
5 趙景欣;劉霞;張文新;;同伴拒絕、同伴接納與農(nóng)村留守兒童的心理適應(yīng):親子親合與逆境信念的作用[J];心理學(xué)報;2013年07期
6 全國婦聯(lián)課題組;;全國農(nóng)村留守兒童 城鄉(xiāng)流動兒童狀況研究報告[J];中國婦運(yùn);2013年06期
7 段成榮;呂利丹;郭靜;王宗萍;;我國農(nóng)村留守兒童生存和發(fā)展基本狀況——基于第六次人口普查數(shù)據(jù)的分析[J];人口學(xué)刊;2013年03期
8 李志;鄒雄;朱鵬;;農(nóng)村留守兒童隔代監(jiān)護(hù)人勝任特征的實證研究[J];中國健康心理學(xué)雜志;2013年03期
9 劉云;趙振國;;隔代教養(yǎng)對學(xué)前兒童情緒調(diào)節(jié)策略的影響[J];學(xué)前教育研究;2013年02期
10 梁寶勇;;心理健康素質(zhì)測評系統(tǒng)·基本概念、理論與編制構(gòu)思[J];心理與行為研究;2012年04期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 楊萍;行為自主決策、親子親合與個體主觀幸福感的關(guān)系[D];山東師范大學(xué);2016年
2 葉曉璐;隔代撫養(yǎng)幼兒的心理理論、祖孫依戀、同伴接納的特點及其關(guān)系研究[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2011年
，本文編號：2149337
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/2149337.html
最近更新
教材專著
