本文選題：自尊 + 影響因素��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：研究目的自尊是大學(xué)生心理健康的核心,是大學(xué)生發(fā)揮主觀能動性的前提。本研究的宗旨在通過對民辦高校和公辦高校本科大學(xué)生自尊現(xiàn)狀及影響因素的研究,了解不同類別院校中不同專業(yè),不同年級,不同性別,不同生源地大學(xué)生的自尊狀況及其差異性和相關(guān)性,并分析其各種影響因素,從而有針對性的進行大學(xué)生心理健康指導(dǎo),調(diào)動大學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)的主觀能動性,為全員育人,全方位育人提供參考依據(jù)。研究方法采用分層整群抽樣,選取山東省濟南市四所大學(xué),研究對象主要包括大一至大四的四個不同專業(yè)的本科學(xué)生,按照不同專業(yè)和年級進行分層,使用大學(xué)生自尊量表以及大學(xué)生基本信息問卷進行調(diào)查,一共發(fā)放問卷2560份,收回的有效問卷2016份,有效率為78.75%。使用Epidata建立數(shù)據(jù)庫,運用SPSS 20.0軟件進行數(shù)據(jù)分析。研究結(jié)果1.從民辦和公辦大學(xué)生自尊現(xiàn)狀分析看,27.93%的大學(xué)生處于低自尊水平。男生比女生的低自尊檢出率高8.2%;大二年級的低自尊檢出率最高35.5%;工科專業(yè)低自尊檢出率最高31.4%,醫(yī)學(xué)專業(yè)低自尊檢出率最低25.6%;城市大學(xué)生的低自尊檢出率比農(nóng)村的高7.0%;是否獨生子女的低自尊檢出率差別很小,分別是27.9%和28.0%;是否班級干部之間的低自尊檢查率也僅僅相差0.9%;家庭月收入在2000元到4000元之間的大學(xué)生低自尊檢查率30.8%;與父母親疏關(guān)系的低自尊檢查率隨著親疏關(guān)系變化呈明顯遞增趨勢,低自尊檢出率分別是19.0%、38.6%和58.7%。大學(xué)生自尊量表各個因子中,人際自尊的低自尊檢出率為32.44%,位居各因子之首。2.民辦高校和公辦高校大學(xué)生自尊量表得分結(jié)果顯示,民辦高校大學(xué)生自尊平均分和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差為131.86±17.01,公辦高校的為135.48±21.11,且兩者差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05),故民辦高校大學(xué)生自尊水平低于公辦高校大學(xué)生;在大學(xué)生自尊量表內(nèi)部各個因子比較中,學(xué)業(yè)自尊、家庭自尊、利他自尊、整體自尊和自尊總分之間的差異均有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P均0.05),且從各因子自尊得分上看民辦高校大學(xué)生各因子自尊水平均低于公辦高校大學(xué)生;不同性別大學(xué)生自尊總分上比較,公辦高校大學(xué)生男女生之間存在差異,女生得分高于男生,而民辦高校大學(xué)生男女生之間自尊總分差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05);同性別比較結(jié)果顯示,民辦高校女大學(xué)生自尊低于公辦高校女大學(xué)生;不同年級之間比較,民辦高校大四學(xué)生的自尊總分最高(136.67±18.55),而公辦高校大一學(xué)生的自尊總分最高(141.50±19.57),相同年級比較,民辦高校和公辦高校大一年級自尊總分差異具有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義,民辦高校大學(xué)生低于公辦高校大學(xué)生;在不同父母親疏關(guān)系中民辦高校和公辦高校大學(xué)生自尊總分均顯示與父母關(guān)系親密的大學(xué)生自尊水平最高,且民辦高校大學(xué)生低于公辦高校大學(xué)生;在不同家庭經(jīng)濟狀況的比較中發(fā)現(xiàn)在家庭月收入4000元的大學(xué)生中民辦高校自尊總分低于公辦高校,且差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P均0.05)。3.按自尊得分的中位數(shù)將所調(diào)查的高校大學(xué)生劃分為高自尊組與低自尊組。進行多因素logistic回歸分析,探究高校大學(xué)生自尊的影響因素。研究發(fā)現(xiàn)年齡、性別、與父母親疏關(guān)系、學(xué)校性質(zhì)、是否班干部以及年級均是大學(xué)生自尊的影響因素。其中與父母的親疏關(guān)系對大學(xué)生自尊的影響最大,結(jié)果顯示隨著與父母親疏關(guān)系的疏遠,大學(xué)生發(fā)生低自尊的風(fēng)險逐漸增加,相比于與父母關(guān)系親密的大學(xué)生,與父母親疏關(guān)系一般的大學(xué)生發(fā)生低自尊的風(fēng)險增高了 3.53倍(OR=3.53,P0.001)。而父母比較嚴(yán)厲的大學(xué)生的低自尊風(fēng)險增高了 5.47倍(OR=5.47,P0.001)。結(jié)論與建議1.整體來看,大學(xué)生低自尊檢出率為男生高于女生,工科專業(yè)高于其他專業(yè),故對男生人數(shù)較多的工科學(xué)院的教學(xué)管理者來說,要更重視大學(xué)生心理健康教育,提高大學(xué)生自尊水平。2.多個因素的自尊水平分析均顯示民辦高校大學(xué)生自尊水平低于公辦高校大學(xué)生,特別是在人際自尊方面。所以在大眾創(chuàng)新,萬眾創(chuàng)業(yè)的當(dāng)今社會,民辦高校更要多給學(xué)生創(chuàng)造交流溝通機會,鼓勵參加社會實踐,采取多種措施豐富完善自我,提高大學(xué)生自尊水平。3.父母親疏關(guān)系與大學(xué)生自尊水平呈正相關(guān),故大學(xué)生父母要增加并重視與孩子的交流和溝通,給孩子更多的關(guān)心與鼓勵,從而提高大學(xué)生自尊水平,保證大學(xué)生心理健康。此外,高校管理者可以考慮建立家校聯(lián)盟平臺,幫助家長更好的了解孩子在校的狀況和表現(xiàn),從而有的放矢的和孩子做好溝通。
[Abstract]:Research objective self-esteem is the core of College Students' mental health and the premise of their subjective initiative. The purpose of this study is to understand the status and influence factors of self-respect of college students in private colleges and public universities and to understand the different majors in different classes, different grades, different sexes and students of different origins. The status of self-respect, its difference and relevance, and the analysis of its various influencing factors, so as to guide the psychological health of college students, to mobilize the subjective initiative of college students, to provide reference basis for all the people to educate and to educate people in all directions. The research method adopts stratified cluster sampling, and selects four universities in Ji'nan, Shandong, to study the Four major undergraduate students, including the first one to four major, were stratified by different majors and grades, using the college students' self-esteem scale and the basic information questionnaire for college students. A total of 2560 questionnaires were issued and 2016 valid questionnaires were collected. The efficiency was 78.75%. using Epidata to establish a database and use SPSS 20. 1. from the analysis of the status of self-respect for private and public college students, 27.93% of the college students were in the low self-esteem level. The rate of low self-esteem detection for boys was 8.2% higher than that of girls, the highest rate of low self-esteem was 35.5% in the second grade, the highest rate of low self-esteem in engineering majors was 31.4%, and the lowest rate in medical professional low self-esteem was 25.6. The rate of low self-esteem in urban college students was 7% higher than that in rural areas. Whether the low self-esteem detection rates of only children were 27.9% and 28%, respectively, the rate of low self-esteem check between class cadres was only 0.9%, and the rate of low self-esteem examination between the family monthly income from 2000 to 4000 yuan was 30.8%, and the relationship between the parents and the parents was 30.8%. The rate of low self-esteem examination showed an obvious increasing trend with the change of relative relationship, the rate of low self-esteem detection was 19%, 38.6% and 58.7%. college students' self-esteem scale, and the low self-esteem detection rate of interpersonal self-esteem was 32.44%. The results showed that the score of self-esteem scale of.2. private colleges and universities and public colleges and universities showed that private colleges and universities were large. The average score and standard deviation of the students' self-esteem were 131.86 + 17.01, and the public universities were 135.48 + 21.11, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). Therefore, the self-respect level of the private college students was lower than that of the public college students. In the comparison of the factors inside the self-respect scale of the college students, the academic self-esteem, family self-esteem, altruistic self-esteem, the overall self-esteem and self-respect were also found. The difference between the total scores was statistically significant (P 0.05), and from the scores of each factor, the self-respect level of each factor of college students in private colleges and universities was lower than that of the public college students. There is no significant difference in the total score of self-esteem (P0.05). The result of homosexual comparison shows that the self-esteem of the female college students in private colleges is lower than that of the female college students in the public colleges and universities. The total score of the self-esteem of the senior four students in the private colleges and universities is the highest (136.67 + 18.55), while the total score of the senior students in the public colleges and universities is the highest (141.50 + 19.57). Compared with the same grade, the difference of the total score of self-esteem in the first grade of the private colleges and universities is statistically significant. The private college students are lower than the public college students. In the relationship between the parents and the public colleges and universities, the total self-esteem scores of the private colleges and the public college students show that the self-esteem of the college students with close relationship with their parents is the highest and private. College students are lower than the public college students. In the comparison of the economic situation of different families, the total score of self-respect in private colleges and universities in the college students with family monthly income of 4000 yuan is lower than that of the public colleges and universities, and the difference is statistically significant (P 0.05) is divided into high self-esteem and low self-respect groups according to the median of self-esteem scores. Zun group. Carry out multiple factor Logistic regression analysis to explore the influence factors of College Students' self-esteem. The study found that age, sex, relationship with parents, school nature, class cadres and grades are the influencing factors of College Students' self-esteem, and the relationship with parents' parents' relationship has the greatest influence on College Students' self-esteem, and the result shows with the father. The risk of low self-esteem in college students increased gradually. Compared to those with close relationship with parents, the risk of low self-esteem of college students with parents close relationship was 3.53 times higher (OR=3.53, P0.001). The risk of low self-esteem of college students with severe parents increased by 5.47 times (OR=5.47, P0.001). On the whole, the rate of low self-esteem of college students is higher than that of girls and engineering major is higher than that of other majors. Therefore, for the teaching managers of the College of Engineering College with more male students, it is necessary to pay more attention to the mental health education of college students, and to improve the self-esteem level of.2., which can improve the level of self-respect of college students, and all show that the private colleges and universities are large. The level of self-esteem of students is lower than that of public college students, especially in interpersonal self-esteem. So in the modern society where the masses are innovating and all the people are doing business, the private colleges and universities should create more opportunities for communication and communication to students, encourage participation in social practice, take various measures to enrich themselves, and improve the level of self-esteem of.3. parents. The level of students' self-esteem is positively related, so the parents of college students should increase and attach importance to the communication and communication with their children, give their children more care and encouragement, so as to improve their self-esteem level and guarantee their mental health. In addition, the university administrators can consider the establishment of a home school alliance platform to help parents better understand the situation of their children in school. And performance so that we can communicate with children in a targeted way.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G444

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張艷霞;大學(xué)生自尊的特點及培養(yǎng)[J];交通高教研究;2004年01期

2 邱楓;;團體箱庭對大學(xué)生自尊干預(yù)的研究綜述[J];吉林省教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年04期

3 宋芳;張麗華;;大學(xué)生自尊結(jié)構(gòu)研究[J];遼寧師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年05期

4 魏俊彪;李妍妍;高莉;;大學(xué)生自尊與主觀幸福感相關(guān)研究[J];河南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年11期

5 許明明;孫群博;;500名大學(xué)生自尊水平與孤獨感的關(guān)系研究[J];青春歲月;2013年07期

6 王欣,阮新,阮軍,米麗 ,賀紅 ,陳思;大學(xué)生自尊特點的研究[J];中國行為醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué);2003年04期

7 李虹;大學(xué)生自尊狀況的調(diào)查研究[J];心理與行為研究;2003年02期

8 楊周;唐燕容;;關(guān)于貧困大學(xué)生自尊心態(tài)問題的探析[J];內(nèi)江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年S1期

9 熊承清;何朝峰;侯艷麗;;大學(xué)生自尊與應(yīng)對方式的關(guān)系[J];中國健康心理學(xué)雜志;2008年01期

10 王小芳;;大學(xué)生自尊的特點及培養(yǎng)[J];和田師范專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2008年05期

相關(guān)會議論文 前9條

1 劉芳;;新疆維漢大學(xué)生自尊與主觀幸福感關(guān)系的對比研究[A];第十二屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會論文摘要集[C];2009年

2 徐青肖;侯玉波;;思維方式和大學(xué)生的自尊體驗[A];北京市社會心理學(xué)會2006年學(xué)術(shù)年會論文摘要集[C];2006年

3 劉愛敏;唐元華;劉錚;唐烈瓊;王志堂;;地方院校大學(xué)生自尊及其影響因素分析[A];達能營養(yǎng)中心青年科學(xué)工作者論壇優(yōu)秀論文集2011年第5期[C];2012年

4 劉璐;;大學(xué)生自尊與應(yīng)對方式的關(guān)系研究[A];第十五屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會議論文摘要集[C];2012年

5 張靜;;大學(xué)生自尊影響因素研究[A];中國心理衛(wèi)生協(xié)會大學(xué)生心理咨詢專業(yè)委員會全國第七屆大學(xué)生心理健康教育與心理咨詢學(xué)術(shù)交流會暨專業(yè)委員會成立十周年紀(jì)念大會論文集[C];2001年

6 宋芳;張麗華;;大學(xué)生自尊結(jié)構(gòu)[A];第十一屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會議論文摘要集[C];2007年

7 李春華;;大學(xué)生自尊、認(rèn)知風(fēng)格與人際沖突應(yīng)對方式的關(guān)系研究[A];二十年“心”之探索——高校心理健康教育理論與方法研究[C];2010年

8 張曉丹;姚本先;;護理專業(yè)大學(xué)生自尊水平研究[A];第十五屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會議論文摘要集[C];2012年

9 郭爽;;大學(xué)生自尊結(jié)構(gòu)與應(yīng)對方式的關(guān)系[A];第十一屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會議論文摘要集[C];2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 笪丹丹;大學(xué)生自尊水平、自我決定學(xué)習(xí)動機和學(xué)業(yè)拖延的關(guān)系研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

2 王碩;2011年與2014年山東省大學(xué)生自尊現(xiàn)狀對比及影響因素分析[D];山東大學(xué);2015年

3 李佳;大學(xué)生自尊及其相關(guān)影響因素的元分析[D];安徽師范大學(xué);2016年

4 徐洪巖;民辦與公辦高校大學(xué)生自尊影響因素及比較研究[D];山東大學(xué);2017年

5 李萍;對當(dāng)代大學(xué)生自尊的培養(yǎng)與維護研究[D];哈爾濱工程大學(xué);2007年

6 歐珊珊;基于彈性理論的大學(xué)生自尊發(fā)展研究[D];西南大學(xué);2009年

7 夏敏;大學(xué)生自尊穩(wěn)定性與攻擊性相關(guān)研究[D];西南大學(xué);2009年

8 彭欣;廣東省某高校大學(xué)生自尊及其相關(guān)的若干因素研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2003年

9 劉鋒;大學(xué)生自尊及其與社會支持的關(guān)系研究[D];江西師范大學(xué);2006年

10 高輝;大學(xué)生自尊水平與應(yīng)對方式關(guān)系研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：2039352