發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-04 20:31

  本文選題：PISA + 批判性思維能力��； 參考：《上海教育科研》2017年01期

【摘要】：正盡管所有參與測(cè)試的國(guó)家和地區(qū)都非常關(guān)注排名,但對(duì)結(jié)果簡(jiǎn)單粗暴的使用絕非PISA測(cè)試的意義和價(jià)值所在。首先,PISA測(cè)試提供了以終身學(xué)習(xí)為導(dǎo)向的、國(guó)際上普遍認(rèn)可的"核心素養(yǎng)"定義和內(nèi)容框架,參與的國(guó)家和地區(qū)得以在這一框架下審視和反思學(xué)生在閱讀、數(shù)學(xué)、科學(xué)等方面的學(xué)習(xí)結(jié)果。在本輪測(cè)試中,4地在閱讀上的平均得分不到500,是3科中最低的。我們有理由猜測(cè),PISA測(cè)試所考查的批判性思維能力,在傳統(tǒng)的語(yǔ)文教學(xué)中并不是重點(diǎn),從而可能導(dǎo)
[Abstract]:Although all countries and regions participating in the tests are very concerned about rankings, simple and crude use of results is not the meaning or value of PISA testing. First of all, the PISA test provides a universally accepted definition and content framework of "core literacy" for lifelong learning, within which participating countries and regions can examine and reflect on students' reading, mathematics, and mathematics. The results of a study in science, etc. The average reading score in this round was less than 500, the lowest in three subjects. We have reason to speculate that the critical thinking ability tested by PISA test is not the key point in traditional Chinese teaching.
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G511

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周琴;;PISA2003對(duì)學(xué)生學(xué)業(yè)成績(jī)的測(cè)評(píng)、分析及其啟示[J];上海教育科研;2006年09期

2 陸t，

本文編號(hào)：1978734