本文關(guān)鍵詞：復(fù)雜性視角下的教育決策機(jī)制研究　出處：《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2008年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 復(fù)雜性 教育決策 教育決策機(jī)制 系統(tǒng)

【摘要】： 教育決策機(jī)制是個(gè)復(fù)雜的系統(tǒng)。本文是用復(fù)雜性的研究視角對(duì)教育決策機(jī)制問題進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)分析。在概括總結(jié)了教育決策理論基礎(chǔ)與實(shí)踐演進(jìn)的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)教育決策機(jī)制研究的復(fù)雜范式、價(jià)值分析等問題進(jìn)行了探討;對(duì)教育決策機(jī)制問題的復(fù)雜性進(jìn)行了深入研究,并構(gòu)建了一種有效的“開放適應(yīng)——協(xié)商互動(dòng)”型教育決策機(jī)制。形成了既有理論研究、邏輯分析,又有實(shí)證分析和案例分析的理論與實(shí)踐相結(jié)合的研究成果。 提出了教育決策研究范式由簡(jiǎn)單范式到復(fù)雜范式的變革。教育決策中的簡(jiǎn)單思維方式與研究范式因其固有缺陷,造成了諸多問題。系統(tǒng)科學(xué)和復(fù)雜性科學(xué)的進(jìn)展為我們研究教育決策提供了一種新的思維方式——復(fù)雜性的研究視角,并有可能形成新的教育決策的研究范式——復(fù)雜性范式。 研究了教育決策機(jī)制研究中的價(jià)值理論和價(jià)值分析方法。價(jià)值問題始終是教育決策研究無法回避的問題,在對(duì)價(jià)值與價(jià)值分析的理論研究基礎(chǔ)上,研究了教育決策機(jī)制研究中的價(jià)值選擇與價(jià)值分析在教育決策機(jī)制研究中的應(yīng)用問題。本文重點(diǎn)研究了教育決策機(jī)制的復(fù)雜性問題。教育決策組織系統(tǒng)要實(shí)現(xiàn)其功能,保證系統(tǒng)各要素有效地運(yùn)行,必須有其合理的結(jié)構(gòu),一定的工作原理、活動(dòng)方式和規(guī)則,即良好的機(jī)制。探討了復(fù)雜性視角下的教育組織決策機(jī)制的靜態(tài)分析和動(dòng)態(tài)過程。從本體論、認(rèn)識(shí)論和方法論三個(gè)層面,以復(fù)雜性的研究視角重點(diǎn)分析了教育決策機(jī)制的要素、結(jié)構(gòu)與功能與研究方法等問題。對(duì)教育決策機(jī)制的邏輯演進(jìn)方面的論述包括教育決策機(jī)制研究的理論模型、教育決策機(jī)制的構(gòu)成主體以及教育決策權(quán)的來源和分配等問題。 構(gòu)建了一種有效的“開放適應(yīng)——協(xié)商互動(dòng)”型的教育決策機(jī)制,它體現(xiàn)為教育決策機(jī)制的組織形式安排到目標(biāo)模式建立的過程。從復(fù)雜性原理的啟示、形式與功能、目標(biāo)模式與實(shí)施有效路徑即一系列的制度安排展開研究。最后,通過分析我國(guó)中小學(xué)改革過程中教師參與教育決策機(jī)制的復(fù)雜性,研究了存在的問題和原因,探討了教師有效參與學(xué)校教育決策的制度安排;對(duì)旨在提高和保障我國(guó)高等教育質(zhì)量的決策機(jī)制的案例研究,分析了我國(guó)高等教育質(zhì)量存在的問題、對(duì)保障高等教育的決策主體進(jìn)行了研究,探討了高等教育內(nèi)部質(zhì)量保障體系的構(gòu)建問題,驗(yàn)證了本文的研究結(jié)論。重視復(fù)雜性原理對(duì)教育決策機(jī)制研究的貢獻(xiàn),通過目標(biāo)模式與一系列的制度安排,可有效的發(fā)揮教育決策系統(tǒng)的功能,提高教育決策的質(zhì)量,促進(jìn)教育決策的民主化、科學(xué)化與制度化。
[Abstract]:The educational decision-making mechanism is a complex system. This paper systematically analyzes the educational decision-making mechanism from the perspective of complexity. On the basis of summarizing the theoretical basis of educational decision-making and the evolution of practice. The complex paradigm and value analysis of educational decision-making mechanism are discussed. This paper deeply studies the complexity of the educational decision-making mechanism, and constructs an effective educational decision-making mechanism of "open adaptation-consultation interaction", which forms the existing theoretical research and logical analysis. There are empirical analysis and case analysis of the theory and practice of the combination of research results. This paper puts forward the transformation of educational decision-making research paradigm from simple paradigm to complex paradigm. The simple mode of thinking and research paradigm in educational decision-making are due to their inherent defects. The progress of system science and complexity science provides us with a new way of thinking for the study of educational decision-making-complexity research perspective. And it is possible to form a new research paradigm of educational decision-complexity paradigm. This paper studies the theory of value and the method of value analysis in the study of educational decision-making mechanism. The value problem is always an unavoidable problem in the study of educational decision making, and it is based on the theoretical study of value and value analysis. This paper studies the application of value selection and value analysis in the study of educational decision-making mechanism. This paper focuses on the complexity of educational decision-making mechanism. Function. To ensure the effective operation of all elements of the system, must have its reasonable structure, a certain working principle, activities and rules. That is, good mechanism. It discusses the static analysis and dynamic process of educational organization decision-making mechanism from the perspective of complexity, from three aspects of ontology, epistemology and methodology. From the perspective of complexity, this paper focuses on the analysis of the elements of educational decision-making mechanism. The discussion on the logical evolution of educational decision-making mechanism includes the theoretical model of educational decision-making mechanism research. The main body of educational decision-making mechanism and the source and distribution of educational decision-making power. In this paper, an effective educational decision-making mechanism of "open adaptation-consultation interaction" is constructed, which is embodied in the process of organizing the educational decision-making mechanism to the establishment of the target mode. Form and function, target mode and effective path of implementation are a series of institutional arrangements. Finally, through the analysis of the complexity of teachers' participation in educational decision-making mechanism in the process of primary and secondary school reform in China. This paper studies the existing problems and causes, and probes into the institutional arrangement of teachers' effective participation in school education decision-making. This paper analyzes the problems existing in the decision-making mechanism of improving and guaranteeing the quality of higher education in China, and makes a study on the decision-making body of ensuring the quality of higher education in China. This paper probes into the construction of internal quality assurance system in higher education, and verifies the conclusion of this paper. The contribution of complexity principle to the study of educational decision-making mechanism is emphasized, and a series of institutional arrangements are put forward through the objective mode. It can give full play to the function of educational decision-making system, improve the quality of educational decision making, and promote the democratization, scientization and institutionalization of educational decision making.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：G40

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 韓春梅;;淺論教育聽證制度在我國(guó)的確立、價(jià)值及其完善[J];北京交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年01期

2 薛蓉;;我國(guó)教育決策研究述評(píng)[J];高等理科教育;2012年02期

3 于博;;基于綜合集成研討廳的宏觀教育決策方法論研究[J];管理現(xiàn)代化;2012年01期

4 于博;;開放的復(fù)雜巨系統(tǒng)視野下的宏觀教育決策研究[J];教育理論與實(shí)踐;2013年28期

5 張進(jìn);孫昭君;;試述完善的教育決策風(fēng)險(xiǎn)溝通體系的構(gòu)建[J];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2014年08期

6 于博;;現(xiàn)狀、困惑和探索:當(dāng)前教育決策研究芻議[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)家;2012年11期

7 李寶慶;劉方林;李海紅;;教育決策風(fēng)險(xiǎn)溝通機(jī)制的建構(gòu)[J];教育發(fā)展研究;2013年12期

8 劉方林;李寶慶;;爭(zhēng)議性教育決策的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)溝通機(jī)制[J];現(xiàn)代中小學(xué)教育;2013年08期

9 于博;;“完全理性”、“有限理性”和“生態(tài)理性”——三種決策理論模式的融合與發(fā)展[J];現(xiàn)代管理科學(xué);2014年10期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 何鵬程;教育公共服務(wù)體系構(gòu)建研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2012年

2 鄭倫仁;大學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)力運(yùn)行機(jī)制研究[D];西南大學(xué);2012年

3 周永平;民族地區(qū)職業(yè)教育補(bǔ)償?shù)霓D(zhuǎn)型研究[D];西南大學(xué);2012年

4 孟鏤，

本文編號(hào)：1403407