發(fā)布時間：2018-09-18 11:42

【摘要】： 目的:通過對比不同處理組的量表評分包括焦慮自評量表(SAS)、抑郁自評量表(SDS)和直腸癌生存質(zhì)量調(diào)查量表(QOL)及實驗室指標包括T細胞亞群的CD3、CD4、CD8、CD4/CD8和自然殺傷細胞(NK Cell)數(shù)目及白細胞計數(shù)(WBC),觀察心理干預(yù)對直腸癌腸造口患者的效果,探討心理干預(yù)對直腸癌腸造口患者情緒、免疫功能及生活質(zhì)量的意義,對促進直腸癌腸造口患者康復(fù)和提高生活質(zhì)量具有實踐意義。 方法:從山西省腫瘤醫(yī)院肛腸科2008年5月至9月的現(xiàn)任住院病人中根據(jù)入組標準選取直腸癌術(shù)后腸造口患者共62例,以隨機分組(隨機數(shù)字表)的方法劃分為干預(yù)組和對照組,干預(yù)組患者32例,對照組患者30例。對干預(yù)組施行常規(guī)治療加心理干預(yù)三個月,在此期間對照組行常規(guī)治療。干預(yù)前、后對比兩組患者的量表評分和實驗室指標及進行前—后測差值比較。 結(jié)果:(1)干預(yù)組和對照組患者干預(yù)前對比,在年齡、性別、職業(yè)、婚姻狀況、經(jīng)濟狀況、既往病史、造口時間、受教育程度方面均無統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異(P0.05),在量表評分和實驗室指標方面亦無統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異(P0.05),可視為兩組患者具有均衡性。兩組患者SDS評分和SAS評分均高于國內(nèi)常模,提示直腸癌腸造口患者存在焦慮、抑郁情緒。(2)干預(yù)組經(jīng)心理干預(yù),在量表評分和實驗室指標方面與對照組均存在統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異。其SDS評分顯著低于對照組(P0.01);其SAS評分顯著低于對照組(P0.05);同時,干預(yù)組QOL總分顯著高于對照組(P0.01),且心理因子評分和社會因子評分分別顯著高于對照組(P0.05),提示心理干預(yù)可幫助改善腸造口患者的情緒狀態(tài)和生活質(zhì)量。CD3數(shù)量顯著高于對照組(P0.01); CD4數(shù)目顯著高于對照組(P0.05); CD8數(shù)目顯著高于對照組(P0.05); NK Cell數(shù)量顯著高于對照組(P0.01); WBC計數(shù)顯著高于對照組(P0.05),提示心理干預(yù)有助于提高腸造口患者的免疫功能。(3)經(jīng)心理干預(yù),干預(yù)組前測—后測差值與對照組前測—后測差值存在顯著性差異。在量表評分方面,干預(yù)組SDS差值與對照組相比具有顯著性差異(P0.01),干預(yù)組SAS差值與對照組存在顯著性差異(P0.05),提示是心理干預(yù)的效力使干預(yù)組患者自身焦慮、抑郁情緒降低,促進了情緒的改善。在實驗室指標方面,干預(yù)組和對照組在CD3差值和CD8差值上有顯著性差異(P0.01),且對照組差值顯著高于干預(yù)組;兩組患者在NK Cell差值上也存在顯著性差異(P0.05),對照組差值顯著高于干預(yù)組。以上結(jié)果提示,心理干預(yù)有效保護了干預(yù)組的免疫功能,而未經(jīng)心理干預(yù)的對照組則更多地受到化療副反應(yīng)的影響,出現(xiàn)免疫功能的下降。(4)對具有顯著性意義的差值進行多元逐步回歸分析,SDS差值、SAS差值、CD3差值、CD8差值、NK Cell差值的主要相關(guān)因素為心理干預(yù)。 結(jié)論:直腸癌腸造口患者明顯存在焦慮、抑郁情緒,免疫功能低下,長期處于這樣的狀態(tài)下,導(dǎo)致生活質(zhì)量差,容易影響疾病的預(yù)后和轉(zhuǎn)歸。心理干預(yù)可有效改善直腸癌腸造口患者的焦慮、抑郁情緒,積極、健康的心理狀況有助于糾正低下的免疫功能,進而提高患者生活質(zhì)量,幫助和促進直腸癌腸造口患者康復(fù)乃至延長生存期。
[Abstract]:Objective: To observe the effect of psychological intervention on rectal cancer intestinal construction by comparing the scores of self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), rectal cancer quality of life inventory (QOL) and laboratory indexes including CD3, CD4, CD8, CD4 / CD8, natural killer cell (NK cell) and white blood cell count (WBC) in different treatment groups. To explore the effect of psychological intervention on emotion, immune function and quality of life of patients with rectal cancer undergoing enterostomy, and to promote the rehabilitation and improve the quality of life of patients with rectal cancer undergoing enterostomy.
Methods: According to the admission criteria, 62 patients with rectal cancer undergoing enterostomy were selected from the current inpatients in Anorectal Department of Shanxi Cancer Hospital from May to September 2008. The patients were randomly divided into intervention group and control group, 32 patients in intervention group and 30 patients in control group. Three months after intervention, the control group received routine treatment. Before and after intervention, the scale scores, laboratory indexes and the difference between the two groups were compared.
Results: (1) There was no significant difference in age, sex, occupation, marital status, economic status, previous medical history, stoma time, education level between the intervention group and the control group before intervention (P The scores of SDS and SAS were significantly lower than those of the control group (P 0.01), and the scores of SAS were significantly lower than those of the control group (P 0.05). The total score of OL was significantly higher than that of the control group (P 0.01), and the scores of psychological factors and social factors were significantly higher than those of the control group (P 0.05), suggesting that psychological intervention can help improve the emotional state and quality of life of patients with enterostomy. The number of NK Cells in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P 0.05), and the WBC count was significantly higher than that in the control group (P 0.05), suggesting that psychological intervention can improve the immune function of patients with enterostomy. The difference of SAS between intervention group and control group was significant (P 0.01), suggesting that the effect of psychological intervention could reduce the anxiety and depression of intervention group, and promote the improvement of emotion. The difference was significant (P 0.01), and the difference between the control group and the intervention group was significantly higher. The difference between the two groups was also significant (P 0.05). The difference between the control group and the intervention group was significantly higher. (4) Multivariate stepwise regression analysis was used to analyze the significant difference. The main related factors of SDS difference, SAS difference, CD3 difference, CD8 difference and NK Cell difference were psychological intervention.
Conclusion: Anxiety, depression and low immune function exist in rectal cancer patients with enterostomy, which lead to poor quality of life and prognosis of the disease. Psychological intervention can effectively improve the anxiety, depression, positive and healthy psychological status of rectal cancer patients with enterostomy. Immune function, and then improve the quality of life of patients, help and promote rectal cancer patients with enterostomy rehabilitation and even prolong survival.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：R735.37;R395.5

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周萍萍,黃麗娥;早期康復(fù)護理干預(yù)對直腸癌術(shù)后康復(fù)的效果觀察[J];現(xiàn)代康復(fù);2000年14期

2 魯勇蘭;;62例直腸癌術(shù)后抑郁癥患者的心理護理[J];當代護士(�？瓢�);2010年09期

3 李楠;王芳;張國莉;;心理干預(yù)對結(jié)直腸癌術(shù)后造瘺病人抑郁狀態(tài)的影響[J];護理研究;2010年21期

4 邱忠霞,鄭德林,李廷富;心理干預(yù)對老年冠心病治療影響初步探討[J];中國臨床康復(fù);1999年08期

5 楊志鳳;晚期腫瘤患者的心理干預(yù)[J];河南醫(yī)藥信息;2002年13期

6 張水蘭,孫小萍,殷鳳芳,劉潔;腫瘤患者的心理分析及心理干預(yù)[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué)版);2002年02期

7 袁瑩,張順珠;心理干預(yù)在慢性乙型肝炎治療中的影響[J];現(xiàn)代臨床護理;2002年02期

8 李秀輝,張玉敏,薛令合;康復(fù)期抑郁癥患者心理干預(yù)對照分析[J];山東精神醫(yī)學(xué);2002年01期

9 徐清玲;乳腺癌患者術(shù)前實施心理干預(yù)的作用[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2003年05期

10 汪方東,葉t，

本文編號：2247800