本文選題：G-CSF動員　切入點：MDC　出處：《安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： G-CSF動員的供體外周血單個核細(xì)胞細(xì)胞貼壁后,在含IL-4和GM-CSF的無血清培養(yǎng)基中誘導(dǎo)培養(yǎng)7d,再用IL-10、ATG和TNFa進(jìn)一步分組誘導(dǎo)2d。收集上清液及細(xì)胞,分別用流式細(xì)胞術(shù)、ELISA、抗原吞噬實驗和混合淋巴細(xì)胞反應(yīng)(MLR)測定各組DC的HLA-DR、CD1a、CD11c、CD40、CD80分子表達(dá),IL-12(P70)分泌,抗原吞噬功能以及同種異體反應(yīng)刺激功能。 結(jié)果 從G-CSF動員的供體外周血中能誘導(dǎo)產(chǎn)生未成熟DC(iDC),CD1a~+DC細(xì)胞產(chǎn)率為1.62±0.57×10~4/2×10~6PBMCs。iDC經(jīng)TNFa、IL-10/TNFa和ATG/TNFa分組誘導(dǎo)后:1.與iDC相比,TNFa刺激后,HLA-DR、CD11c、CD40、CD80的表達(dá)均明顯增高,IL-12分泌增加,同種異體反應(yīng)刺激能力增強(qiáng)。2.與TNFa刺激組相比,IL-10/TNFa組CD1a表達(dá)增高,對應(yīng)的其他分子表達(dá)均明顯減弱,IL-12分泌及同種異體反應(yīng)刺激能力明顯減低。3.與TNFa刺激組相比,ATG/TNFa組HLA-DR、CD11c、CD40、CD80表達(dá)均明顯減弱,IL-12分泌和同種異體反應(yīng)刺激能力明顯減低。 4.ATG/TNFa組與IL-10/TNFa組相比,CD1a表達(dá)減弱,CD11c、CD80表達(dá)明顯增高,同種異體反應(yīng)刺激能力增強(qiáng)。5.iDC經(jīng)TNFa誘導(dǎo)成熟后,吞噬抗原的能力明顯減弱。6.從G-CSF動員的供體PBMCs中誘導(dǎo)產(chǎn)生的iDC,其HLA-DR、CD11c表達(dá)明顯低于未經(jīng)動員的健康對照來源的iDC。TNFa刺激后,CD11c、CD40、CD80表達(dá)、IL-12分泌和同種異體反應(yīng)刺激能力均明顯低于健康對照。 結(jié)論 1、從G-CSF動員的供體外周血單個核細(xì)胞中可以誘導(dǎo)產(chǎn)生iDC,TNF-a能誘導(dǎo)其分化成熟,IL-10、ATG誘導(dǎo)可使其獲得致耐受的特性。 2、與健康獻(xiàn)血員相比,G-CSF動員的供體外周血單個核細(xì)胞來源的DC表型相對幼稚,同種異體反應(yīng)刺激能力較弱。 3、盡管從G-CSF動員的供體PBMC中誘導(dǎo)產(chǎn)生CD1a~+DC的效率不及未經(jīng)動員的健康獻(xiàn)血員高,但因從動員的供體外周血中可以采集到大量的PBMCs,因此,G-CSF動員的外周血有望成為不同DC的重要來源途徑。 二、G-CSF動員的供體不同DC亞群免疫生物學(xué)特性的研究 實驗方法 用免疫磁珠分離髓細(xì)胞來源的DC(MDC)和漿細(xì)胞來源的DC(PDC),并分別用TNFa、CpG_(2006)OND誘導(dǎo)為成熟MDC(mMDC)和成熟PDC(mPDC)。具體的研究方法如下:1.流式細(xì)胞術(shù)測定各DC亞群的表型;2.MLR測定不同DC亞群同種異體反應(yīng)刺激能力;3.ELISA測定MLR培養(yǎng)上清液中INF-γ、IL-10的含量,細(xì)胞內(nèi)流式術(shù)測定MLR后CD4~+T細(xì)胞的。INF-γ和IL-4分泌水平;4.流式細(xì)胞術(shù)和RT-PCR測定MLR后CD4~+CD25~(high)T細(xì)胞比例和Foxp3mRNA的表達(dá)。 結(jié)果 1.分選的MDC純度＞96%,高表達(dá)HLA-DR、CD11c、CD33,中度表達(dá)CD4,極低表達(dá)CD40、CD45RA、CD80,經(jīng)TNFa誘導(dǎo)成熟后CD40、CD80表達(dá)上調(diào)。PDC純度＞95%,高表達(dá)HLA-DR、CD4、CD45RA,極低表達(dá)CD11c、CD33、CD40、CD80,經(jīng)CpG2006OND誘導(dǎo)成熟后CD40、CD80表達(dá)上調(diào)。 2.MDC特別是mMDC具有很強(qiáng)的刺激T淋巴細(xì)胞增殖能力,但PDC、mPDC同種異體反應(yīng)刺激能力很弱。 3.mMDC刺激后,T細(xì)胞分泌INF-γ水平明顯高于MDC和PDC刺激。PDC特別是mPDC刺激后,IL-10明顯增高。 4.MDC和mMDC刺激后,CD4~+T細(xì)胞胞漿內(nèi)IFN-γ的表達(dá)均明顯高于對照組和PDC刺激組,mMDC刺激組的表達(dá)最高。所有刺激組CD4~+T細(xì)胞內(nèi)IL-4的表達(dá)無明顯差異。 5.MDC和mMDC對CD4~+CD25~(high)Treg無明顯影響,PDC則上調(diào)Treg,mPDC的作用更為明顯; 6.Foxp3mRNA的表達(dá)在各組間無明顯的差別。 結(jié)論 1.采集的供體外周血中兩類DC亞群雖然HLA-DR高表達(dá),但仍處于非成熟狀態(tài),在合適的條件下分化成熟;無論MDC成熟與否均表現(xiàn)出很強(qiáng)的刺激T細(xì)胞增殖能力,可以促進(jìn)使T細(xì)胞分泌IFN-γ增加,其分泌的增加可能是促進(jìn)向Th1極化的結(jié)果。 2.PDC可能并不像MDC一樣有效地捕獲、處理和負(fù)載抗原到MHC分子上,因此呈遞抗原效率低,表現(xiàn)出對T細(xì)胞的弱刺激增殖特性;PDC雖然也可以促進(jìn)T細(xì)胞分泌IFN-γ的分泌,但似乎并非是通過Th1細(xì)胞分泌:PDC并不能促進(jìn)Th2類因子IL-4的分泌,對Th2的極化作用可能表現(xiàn)在IL-10的分泌上。 3.PDC有誘導(dǎo)CD4~+CD25~(high)Treg的作用。
[Abstract]:G-CSF mobilized donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells to adherent cells in serum-free medium, cultured 7d, and then IL-10 containing IL-4 and GM-CSF, ATG and TNFa further group induced 2D. supernatant was collected and cells respectively by flow cytometry, ELISA, antigen phagocytosis test and mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) determination of serum DC HLA-DR, CD1a, CD11c, CD40, expression of CD80, IL-12 (P70) secretion and phagocytosis of antigen and allogeneic stimulation.
Result
From G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood donor can induce immature DC (iDC), CD1a~+DC cell yield was 1.62 + 0.57 * 10~4/2 * 10~6PBMCs.iDC by TNFa, IL-10/TNFa and ATG/TNFa groups after induction: 1. compared with iDC, TNFa, HLA-DR, CD11c after stimulation, CD40 CD80 expression was significantly increased, the increase of IL-12 the secretion of allogeneic stimulation enhance the ability of.2. stimulation compared with TNFa group, IL-10/TNFa group increased the expression of CD1a, the expression of the corresponding other molecules were significantly decreased, IL-12 secretion and decreased ability to stimulate alloreactive.3. stimulation compared with TNFa group, ATG/TNFa group, HLA-DR, CD11c, CD40, CD80 expression significantly decreased, and the secretion of IL-12 allogeneic stimulatory capacity decreased significantly.
Compared with 4.ATG/TNFa group and IL-10/TNFa group, the reduced expression of CD1a, CD11c, CD80 expression was significantly increased, allogeneic stimulation enhanced the ability of.5.iDC induced by TNFa after maturation, phagocytosis of antigen induced by.6. significantly decreased from G-CSF mobilized donor PBMCs iDC, the HLA-DR, CD11c expression was significantly lower than that in the mobilization of healthy control source after iDC.TNFa stimulation, CD11c, CD40, CD80 expression, IL-12 secretion and stimulate alloreactive capacity were significantly lower than that of healthy controls.
conclusion
1, iDC can be induced from peripheral blood mononuclear cells mobilized by G-CSF, and TNF-a can induce differentiation and maturation. IL-10 and ATG induce it to achieve tolerance.
2, compared with the healthy blood donors, the DC phenotype of G-CSF mobilized donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells is relatively immature, and the allogenic reaction is weak.
3, although the efficiency of inducing CD1a~+DC from donor PBMC mobilized by G-CSF is higher than that of unmobilized healthy blood donors, a large number of PBMCs can be collected from mobilized donor peripheral blood. Therefore, peripheral blood mobilized by G-CSF is expected to become an important source of different DC.
Study on the immunological biological characteristics of two, G-CSF mobilized donor different DC subgroups
Experimental method
The separation of myeloid derived by immunomagnetic beads of DC (MDC) and plasma cells derived DC (PDC), were treated with TNFa, CpG_ (2006) OND MDC (mMDC) induced into mature and mature PDC (mPDC). The specific research methods are as follows: 1. phenotypes were detected by flow cytometry in various DC subsets 2.MLR; Determination of different subsets of DC allogeneic stimulation ability; 3.ELISA determination of MLR in supernatant of INF- gamma, IL-10 content, cell flow cytometry determination of MLR of CD4~+T cells after.INF- gamma and IL-4 secretion; 4. flow cytometry and RT-PCR assay after MLR CD4~+CD25~ (high) T cells and expression than cases Foxp3mRNA.
Result
1. sorting MDC purity is more than 96%, the high expression of HLA-DR, CD11c, CD33, moderate expression of CD4, low expression of CD40, CD45RA, CD80, induced by TNFa after mature CD40, upregulation of CD80.PDC purity is more than 95%, the high expression of HLA-DR, CD4, CD45RA, low expression of CD11c, CD33, CD40, CD80, the CpG2006OND induced mature CD40, upregulate the expression of CD80.
2.MDC, especially mMDC, has a strong ability to stimulate T lymphocyte proliferation, but PDC, mPDC allograft response is very weak.
After 3.mMDC stimulation, the level of INF- gamma secreted by T cells was significantly higher than that of MDC and PDC stimulated.PDC, especially after mPDC stimulation, and IL-10 was significantly increased.
After stimulation with 4.MDC and mMDC, the expression of IFN- gamma in CD4~+T cells was significantly higher than that in the control group and PDC stimulation group. The expression of mMDC in the mMDC stimulation group was the highest. There was no significant difference in IL-4 expression in all stimulation group CD4~+T cells.
5.MDC and mMDC had no obvious effect on CD4~+CD25~ (high) Treg, while PDC increased Treg, and mPDC had more obvious effect.
There was no significant difference in the expression of 6.Foxp3mRNA between the groups.
conclusion
The two class of 1. donor peripheral blood DC subsets while high expression of HLA-DR, but is still in the immature state, under the suitable conditions of differentiation and maturation of MDC; whether mature or not showed a strong stimulation of the proliferation ability of T cells, T cells can promote the secretion of IFN- increased the secretion increase may promote the result of Th1 polarization.
Unlike MDC and 2.PDC could effectively capture, processing and antigen to the MHC molecule, so the antigen presentation efficiency is low, showing the proliferation characteristics of weak stimulation on T secretion of PDC cells; although also can promote IFN- secretion of T cells, but it was not secreted by Th1 cells: PDC did not promote the secretion of Th2 factor IL-4, the polarization effect of Th2 might reflect the production of IL-10.
3.PDC has the effect of inducing CD4~+CD25~ (high) Treg.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：R392

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐黎;常春康;干蔚瑾;蘇基瀅;張曦;吳凌云;宋陸茜;賀琪;周立宇;肖超;劉宏;李曉;;化療后恰當(dāng)時機(jī)使用G-CSF能顯著提高自體外周血干細(xì)胞移植物中CD34~+細(xì)胞的含量[J];中國實驗血液學(xué)雜志;2011年03期

2 ;[J];;年期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會議論文 前3條

1 ;曼迪森MDC半導(dǎo)體激光治療機(jī)(上海曼迪森光電有限公司)[A];全國中醫(yī)藥疼痛高峰論壇暨中華中醫(yī)藥學(xué)會疼痛學(xué)分會成立大會會刊[C];2010年

2 嚴(yán)匡華;劉復(fù)強(qiáng);吳軼蘋;;mini-MAE方案聯(lián)合G-CSF動員慢性粒細(xì)胞白血病慢性期患者外周血干細(xì)胞1例[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會第八次全國血液學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2004年

3 朱尊民;張琳;翟亞萍;張茵;;外周血單個核細(xì)胞與外周血干細(xì)胞誘導(dǎo)產(chǎn)生樹突細(xì)胞的比較[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會心血管病分會第八次全國心血管病學(xué)術(shù)會議匯編[C];2004年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前4條

1 記者 趙奕　實習(xí)記者 錢誼娟;MDC：市場規(guī)模占比74% 醫(yī)院仍為藥品銷售主渠道[N];第一財經(jīng)日報;2010年

2 ;黑龍江移動確保業(yè)務(wù)領(lǐng)先有實招[N];人民郵電;2002年

3 本報駐聯(lián)合國記者王俊鳴;太空不應(yīng)成為人類下一個戰(zhàn)場[N];科技日報;2002年

4 劉志平;醫(yī)療器械將面臨貿(mào)易技術(shù)壁壘[N];中藥事業(yè)報;2000年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 劉文靜;培土清心方治療特應(yīng)性皮炎的療效及對CC亞族趨化因子的影響[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2007年

2 劉虹;G-CSF動員骨髓干細(xì)胞治療大鼠急性心肌梗死的療效觀察[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2004年

3 邢莉民;自身免疫性溶血性貧血/Evans綜合征患者外周血樹突狀細(xì)胞/T細(xì)胞數(shù)量、亞群及功能研究[D];中國協(xié)和醫(yī)科大學(xué);2006年

4 武元山;無線Mesh網(wǎng)VOD流媒體跨層緩存策略研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2012年

5 劉東雷;調(diào)整自噬表達(dá)對食管癌EC9706細(xì)胞化療敏感性的影響及其機(jī)制研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 汪健;G-CSF動員的供體外周血樹突狀細(xì)胞免疫生物學(xué)特性的研究[D];安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué);2008年

2 鈕柏琳;樹狀串聯(lián)hTERT表位多肽負(fù)載MDC疫苗體外激發(fā)抗HLA-A2+腫瘤細(xì)胞免疫應(yīng)答的效應(yīng)研究[D];重慶醫(yī)科大學(xué);2011年

3 劉美琴;快速分形圖像編碼算法的研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2007年

4 慎華平;hTERT多表位肽致敏mDC誘導(dǎo)CTL對HLA-A24陽性腫瘤細(xì)胞殺傷效應(yīng)的研究[D];重慶醫(yī)科大學(xué);2011年

5 李樹亮;結(jié)直腸癌患者腫瘤組織中調(diào)節(jié)性T細(xì)胞（Tregs）水平及臨床意義[D];天津醫(yī)科大學(xué);2008年

6 張建梅;胰島素抵抗大鼠胰島及HIT-T15細(xì)胞氧化應(yīng)激與自吞噬的研究[D];四川大學(xué);2006年

7 吳錦泉;基于條件概率雙向預(yù)測量化的MDC方法[D];華南理工大學(xué);2010年

8 王秉文;氣/液界面脂肪醇類分子膜的傳質(zhì)特性研究[D];天津科技大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1641294