本文關(guān)鍵詞：從《1984》到《1Q84》：論人的主體性喪失與重建　出處：《東北師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 《1984》 奧威爾 《1Q84》 村上春樹 主體性

【摘要】：《1984》是英國作家喬治·奧威爾（George Orwell，1903-1950）的傳世之作。而日本作家村上春樹（Haruki Murakami，1949-）在出版《1Q84》后曾明確表示《1Q84》是對(duì)奧威爾小說《1984》的“致敬式”創(chuàng)作，同時(shí)還特別強(qiáng)調(diào)自己所寫的就是“1984年”。目前對(duì)于這兩部作品的文學(xué)批評(píng)只有簡(jiǎn)單的主題比較，還很少有交叉性的解讀。 《1984》是奧威爾寫于1948年的預(yù)言小說，而《1Q84》是村上春樹寫于2009年的一種超現(xiàn)實(shí)回顧的“物語”。奧威爾假借構(gòu)建的“1984年”的社會(huì)狀態(tài)警示了極權(quán)統(tǒng)治可能帶來的惡果，而對(duì)于現(xiàn)代社會(huì)，村上春樹的這層憂慮可能更深。 “主體性”一直是哲學(xué)領(lǐng)域廣為關(guān)注的課題。在其衍變過程中，一方面，“主體性”的基點(diǎn)在于人的自然本能與不自覺的自我意識(shí)；另一方面，人的自然欲望總是受到各種“體制性”的東西的規(guī)訓(xùn)。經(jīng)過梳理和對(duì)比，筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)兩部小說都展現(xiàn)出人的主體性喪失的惡果，都著力表現(xiàn)了在不同歷史語境下個(gè)體的生存狀態(tài)。 本文試圖從“主體性”的視角來探究?jī)晌蛔骷业耐粐�，研究在不同民族與國家的歷史語境下，，在體制禁錮、抹削歷史記憶、身體改造等方面表現(xiàn)出來的相似和相異。通過文本間的比較分析，從宏觀到微觀，探討其背后所隱藏的文化與哲學(xué)涵義，再返回到宏觀文學(xué)領(lǐng)域，觀看現(xiàn)代人的生存狀態(tài)。 論文主要分為五個(gè)部分： 引言是對(duì)兩部作品的研究現(xiàn)狀以及兩位作家創(chuàng)作背景的介紹，并通過梳理“主體性”，指出本文試圖圍繞這一視角展開對(duì)兩部作品的剖析。 第一章是梳理兩部作品中主體性的喪失過程，通過“老大哥”與“小小人”的對(duì)比，分析人在不同歷史時(shí)期的生存狀態(tài)。 第二章是分析兩部作品中主體性的保存方式，一方面是溫斯頓在極權(quán)環(huán)境下尋找共鳴的經(jīng)歷與體驗(yàn)；另一方面是天吾與青豆在平行世界內(nèi)展開的冒險(xiǎn)歷程。 第三章是探究?jī)晌蛔骷以诿媾R主體困境下的突圍之路，一方面是溫斯頓重陷魔爪的悲劇，另一方面是天吾與青豆攜手新生的神話。 結(jié)語是對(duì)全文做出的總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:<1984> is a British writer George Orwell (George Orwell, 1903-1950) masterpieces. The Japanese writer Haruki Murakami (Haruki Murakami 1949-) published in <1Q84> after <1Q84> is made clear in Orwell's novel <1984> "tribute" creation, also emphasized that he wrote is "1984". For the two works of literary criticism only simple themes, there are few cross interpretation.
<1984> is a novel written by Orwell in 1948 that, while <1Q84> is an ultra realistic review of the "story" written by Haruki Murakami in 2009. Social status warning Orwell under the guise of the construction of the "1984" authoritarian rule may bring about the consequences, but in modern society, this worry Haruki Murakami may be deeper.
"Subjectivity" has been widely concerned issue of philosophy. In the process of development, on the one hand, starting point of "subjectivity" is the natural instinct of people with self-consciousness; on the other hand, people's desire has always been "systemic" things after combing discipline. And comparison, the author found that two novels show people's subjectivity lost the consequences, both focus on the performance of individual in different historical context of the survival of the state.
This paper tries to explore the two writers from the perspective of the break out of the road, in the different ethnic and national historical context, in the system of imprisonment, wiped the memory of history, similarities and differences of body modification and other aspects. Through the comparison of the text, from macroscopic to microcosmic, study culture with the philosophical meaning hidden behind it, and then return to the macro literature, watch the modern people's living condition.
The thesis is divided into five parts:
The introduction is about the research status of the two works and the introduction of the two writers' background. By combing "subjectivity", it points out that this article tries to analyze the two works from this perspective.
The first chapter combs the loss process of subjectivity in the two works. By comparing the big brother with the little man, it analyzes the survival state of people in different historical periods.
The second chapter is to analyze the preservation of subjectivity in the two works. On the one hand, Winston's experience and experience of seeking resonance in the totalitarian environment; on the other hand, the adventures of Tian Wu and green beans in the parallel world.
The third chapter is to explore the breakthrough of the two writers in the face of the predicament of the main road, on the one hand is Winston back into the clutches of the tragedy, on the other hand is my new day and green beans to the myth.
The conclusion is a summary of the full text.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：I106.4-03

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 吳楠;;探析喬治·奧威爾小說《1984》中的黑色幽默[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2011年10期

2 田俊武;唐博;;奧威爾《1984》的空間解讀[J];名作欣賞;2008年12期

3 蘇繪泉;;《動(dòng)物莊園》和《1984》中極權(quán)統(tǒng)治方式分析[J];綏化學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

4 楊炳菁;;解讀《1Q84》的奇妙世界[J];外國文學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2009年05期

5 劉研;;國內(nèi)村上春樹研究概況及走向[J];日本學(xué)論壇;2008年02期

6 董英;;《1984》中的反抗與革命[J];湖南工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期

本文編號(hào)：1403117