本文關(guān)鍵詞：莫言《蛙》與村上春樹《沒有色彩的多崎作和他的巡禮之年》的比較研究　出處：《延邊大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 生命意識(shí) 心理學(xué) 莫言 村上春樹

【摘要】：2012年莫言獲得諾貝爾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng),這個(gè)榮譽(yù)是來之不易的。那年被提名的還有日本的村上春樹,很多人都認(rèn)為村上春樹會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)。因?yàn)樗淖髌繁淮蟊娝苤?并翻譯成很多語言被世人流傳。但2012年瑞典皇室把這份榮譽(yù)授給了莫言。自從莫言獲獎(jiǎng)之后,很多人更關(guān)注村上春樹,雖然之后村上春樹仍然沒能獲獎(jiǎng),但他的更多作品仍然被大家所接受并喜愛。生命是至高無上的,每個(gè)個(gè)體都是一個(gè)生命,每一個(gè)生命都有它的存在的價(jià)值。過去是因?yàn)檎螇浩扰c人類的無知,而現(xiàn)在是人們過于追求自己的利益,就導(dǎo)致人類忽視生命的尊嚴(yán)及價(jià)值。生命的意義在于追尋自然規(guī)律的情況下,傳承人類的生命：生命的價(jià)值在于尊重、了解與包容。但因?yàn)榭茖W(xué)和醫(yī)學(xué)的不斷快速發(fā)展,使人類鈍化了對(duì)生命的珍惜,讓人類把生命當(dāng)做交易的手段來使用。本論文通過莫言的《蛙》和村上春樹的《沒有色彩的多崎作和他的巡禮之年》的比較,了解兩位作家的異同點(diǎn),用心理學(xué)知識(shí)來了解當(dāng)代人們的生命意識(shí)及心靈挫傷。兩位作家都很重視生命意識(shí),在作品中用不同的方式體現(xiàn)了他們對(duì)生命的強(qiáng)烈欲望。莫言的《蛙》表達(dá)了在八十年代,中國(guó)實(shí)施計(jì)劃生育時(shí)面臨的有關(guān)生命價(jià)值的問題。莫言在作品中以人的生命為基點(diǎn),重視人的感性,通過個(gè)體生命的關(guān)注,表現(xiàn)作者對(duì)生命價(jià)值的理解,強(qiáng)調(diào)生命的重要性。村上春樹的《沒有色彩的多崎作和他的巡禮之年》也寫到了人對(duì)生命的關(guān)注及理解。通過尋找自我的旅行中,了解自己的過去,理解他人的感受,并得到自我心靈挫傷的治療。本論文的第一章闡述了研究范圍及研究方法。第二章通過具體的比較,用心理學(xué)的角度來了解女性形象,人們的負(fù)罪意識(shí)和贖罪意識(shí)。從中發(fā)現(xiàn)兩位作家對(duì)生命意識(shí)的異同點(diǎn)。第三章進(jìn)一步研究?jī)晌蛔骷业纳庾R(shí)。其一是有關(guān)誕生意識(shí)的比較,其二就是有關(guān)死亡意識(shí)的比較。第四章以結(jié)論做出總結(jié),詮釋現(xiàn)代人需要強(qiáng)烈的生命力,要關(guān)注生命,重視生命價(jià)值。本論文通過比較兩位作家的作品,來證實(shí)人們對(duì)生命意識(shí)的態(tài)度與感知。用心理學(xué)視角來了解與發(fā)現(xiàn)引起這些現(xiàn)象的原因。兩位作家都是用自己獨(dú)特的表達(dá)方法來呼吁人們關(guān)注生命及其價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:In 2012 Mo Yan won the Nobel Prize for Literature, an honor that was not easy to win. That year he was also nominated by Murakami, a Japanese man, who many people thought would win because his work was well known. In 2012, the Swedish royal family awarded the honor to Mo Yan. Since Mo Yan won the prize, many people have paid more attention to Murakami, although he has not won the prize since. But more of his works are still accepted and loved. Life is supreme, every individual is a life, every life has its own value. The past is due to political oppression and human ignorance. But now it is people who pursue their own interests too much, which leads people to ignore the dignity and value of life. The meaning of life lies in the pursuit of natural laws, the inheritance of human life: the value of life lies in respect. Understanding and tolerance. But because of the rapid development of science and medicine, people passivate the treasure of life. Let human beings use life as a means of trading. This paper compares Mo Yan's Frog with Murakami's'No Color 'and' the year of his Tour'to understand the similarities and differences between the two writers. Using psychological knowledge to understand contemporary people's life consciousness and spiritual contusion. Two writers attach great importance to life consciousness. Their strong desire for life is reflected in different ways in his works. "Frog" by Mo Yan is expressed in 80s. In his works, Mo Yan regards human life as the basic point, attaches importance to human sensibility, and expresses the author's understanding of the value of life through the concern of individual life. Emphasize the importance of life. Haruki Murakami's "the year of the Dozaki without colors" also writes about people's concern and understanding of life. Through the journey to find themselves, understand their own past. Understand the feelings of others, and get the treatment of self-spiritual contusion. The first chapter of this paper describes the scope of research and research methods. The second chapter through the specific comparison, using the psychological perspective to understand the image of women. People's consciousness of guilt and atonement. We find the similarities and differences between the two writers' consciousness of life. The third chapter further studies the consciousness of life of the two writers. One is the comparison of the consciousness of birth. The second is the comparison of the consciousness of death. Chapter 4th concludes with conclusions and interprets that modern people need strong vitality, pay attention to life and value of life. This paper compares the works of two writers. In order to verify people's attitude and perception towards life consciousness and to understand and discover the causes of these phenomena from the perspective of psychology, the two writers appeal to people to pay attention to life and its value with their own unique expression methods.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：I106.4-03

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李榮博;;論莫言《蛙》的生命哲學(xué)與生命自覺[J];小說評(píng)論;2012年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1393426