【摘要】：歌曲翻譯與詩歌翻譯之間存在許多相似性,盡管如此,他們之間的差異性還是非常明顯的。詩歌翻譯講究的是視覺藝術(shù)美,讓人讀起來朗朗上口,其用詞可由詩人隨心所欲,任其發(fā)揮想象,抒發(fā)情感。而歌曲翻譯更多的是講究聽覺藝術(shù)美,它不僅需要歌詞符合原曲的結(jié)構(gòu),風(fēng)格和寫作手法,同時還要考慮到所翻譯的歌詞是否具有可唱性,因此在翻譯的同時要考慮到歌曲的音域,這樣就加大了在翻譯時對詞匯,句法和修辭手法的選擇。本論文主要以許淵沖教授的詩歌翻譯觀點與思想作為主要的理論框架,探討歌曲翻譯的獨特性,尤其是歌曲翻譯固有的難點,需要靈活選擇翻譯策略和解決方案。許淵沖教授是二十世紀(jì)末最有名氣的翻譯家和翻譯理論家之一,他對中國傳統(tǒng)文化在西方的傳播做出了卓越的貢獻(xiàn),他的譯作深受國內(nèi)外廣大讀者的歡迎,基于豐富的翻譯實踐,許淵沖概括出來一套詩歌翻譯的理論體系,其中包括著名的“三美論”(意美,音美和形美)和“三化論”(淺化,等化和深化)。他進(jìn)一步提出知之,樂之和好之的“三之論”指導(dǎo)準(zhǔn)則。許淵沖提出,翻譯是使一種語言轉(zhuǎn)化為另一種語言的藝術(shù),主要解決原文內(nèi)容和譯文形式之間的矛盾。他更強(qiáng)調(diào)在翻譯詩歌的同時,不但要傳達(dá)原詩的意美,還要盡可能傳達(dá)它的音美和形美。許淵沖的翻譯理論主要強(qiáng)調(diào)的是:美,超越與忠實。通過對比一些精心挑選的經(jīng)典英文歌曲及其漢譯本,本論文得出以下初步結(jié)論:歌曲翻譯應(yīng)該以“可唱、措辭句法得體、藝術(shù)體驗相似”為其指導(dǎo)原則與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。這一概念與許淵沖教授的詩歌翻譯理論在一定程度上是吻合的。
[Abstract]:There are many similarities between song translation and poetry translation. Poetry translation stresses the beauty of visual art, which can be read in a wide range of words, and the poet can use his imagination and express his feelings as he pleases. Song translation is more about the artistic beauty of hearing. It not only needs the lyrics to conform to the structure, style and writing techniques of the original song, but also takes into account whether the lyrics translated are singing or not. Therefore, the range of songs should be taken into account in translation, thus increasing the choice of lexical, syntactic and rhetorical devices in translation. This thesis takes Professor Xu Yuanchong's views and ideas of poetry translation as the main theoretical framework to explore the uniqueness of song translation, especially the inherent difficulties of song translation, and requires flexible choice of translation strategies and solutions. Professor Xu Yuanchong is one of the most famous translators and translation theorists at the end of the 20th century. He has made outstanding contributions to the spread of Chinese traditional culture in the West. Based on the rich translation practice, Xu Yuanchong generalizes a set of theoretical systems of poetry translation, including the famous "three Beauty" (meaning beauty, sound beauty and form beauty) and "three transformation theory" (superficial, equalization and deepening). He further proposed the "three of the three" guidelines of knowing and happy harmony. Xu Yuanchong put forward that translation is the art of transforming one language into another, which mainly resolves the contradiction between the content of the original text and the form of the translation. He emphasizes that while translating poems, he should not only convey the beauty of the original poem, but also convey the beauty of sound and form as much as possible. Xu Yuanchong's translation theory emphasizes beauty, transcendence and faithfulness. By comparing some carefully selected classical English songs and their Chinese translations, this thesis draws the following preliminary conclusions: song translation should be guided by the principles and standards of "singing, syntactic appropriateness and similarity of artistic experience". To some extent, this concept coincides with Xu Yuanchong's theory of poetry translation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H315.9

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 程華林;;創(chuàng)譯還是誤譯:從許淵沖教授幾首古詩詞英譯作品說起[J];綿陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年06期

2 陳國堅;;詩詞西譯續(xù)談——再評許淵沖教授的三美論[J];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2011年06期

3 陳國堅;;三十年詩詞西譯雜談——兼評許淵沖教授的三美論[J];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2008年01期

4 劉英凱;許淵沖教授“音美”理論與實踐質(zhì)疑[J];深圳大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);1986年02期

5 劉英凱;“形美”、“音美”雜議——與許淵沖教授商榷[J];外語學(xué)刊;1982年03期

6 何善秀;李宗;;許淵沖教授詩歌翻譯中疊詞英譯賞析[J];瘋狂英語(教師版);2008年06期

7 黃萍;;從翻譯中發(fā)現(xiàn)美——淺談許淵沖教授古詩英譯“三美”論[J];科教文匯(中旬刊);2009年10期

8 鄭賢貴,潘演強(qiáng);論“優(yōu)勢競賽論”[J];上海翻譯;2005年04期

9 胡梅紅;論埃文-佐哈爾的“多元系統(tǒng)論”——兼評許淵沖教授的“競賽論”[J];宿州學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年05期

10 豐華瞻;翻譯《西風(fēng)頌》隨感[J];外國語(上海外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報);1993年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 高民;許淵沖教授談　加強(qiáng)大學(xué)生素質(zhì)教育[N];光明日報;2004年

，

本文編號：2426895