詞類范疇化研究一直是語言學(xué)研究的熱點(diǎn)與難點(diǎn),超過1000種分析語的詞類問題被視為語言學(xué)界的哥德巴赫猜想。在2014年舉行的德國語言學(xué)會(huì)第36屆年會(huì)上,詞類語言范疇問題被視為語言的“上帝粒子研究”。現(xiàn)代漢語的詞類標(biāo)注一直是個(gè)老大難問題,因此以現(xiàn)代漢語詞典為藍(lán)本的漢外詞典詞類標(biāo)注研究則更面臨著更多棘手的困難。在漢外詞典的詞類標(biāo)注研究中,涉及漢英詞典的較多,而探討漢法詞典中詞類標(biāo)注的研究則寥寥無幾。有鑒于此,本文以“分析語的雙層詞類范疇化理論模型”為理論基礎(chǔ),選取權(quán)威的《漢法大詞典》作為研究對(duì)象,對(duì)其中所涉及到的“X化”詞條的詞類標(biāo)注情況作深入系統(tǒng)的實(shí)證研究,以期為漢語詞類問題提供啟示。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),與《現(xiàn)代漢語詞典》(第6版)鮮有兼類所不同的是,在該詞典中提取的107個(gè)“X化”詞條中,有54個(gè)詞條被處理成為兼類詞,占所有“X化”雙音節(jié)詞條的50.4%;從義項(xiàng)、配例、例證三個(gè)方面考察的結(jié)果表明,《漢法大詞典》承認(rèn)“X化”雙音節(jié)詞條的自指用法,但鮮有獨(dú)立義項(xiàng)的設(shè)置;此外,《漢法大詞典》中“X化”雙音節(jié)詞條的詞類標(biāo)注情況基本符合“詞類對(duì)譯”原則,但也不乏許多不得已而之的混合譯義處理。本項(xiàng)研究不僅調(diào)查...

【文章頁數(shù)】：93 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Motivations of the Study
    1.2 Objectives of the Study
    1.3 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Previous Studies on Word Class
        2.1.1 The Origin of Studies on Word Class
        2.1.2 The Criteria of Word Class Categorization
    2.2 Previous Studies on Multifunctionality
        2.2.1 The Definition of Multifunctionality
        2.2.2 The Studies on Treatment of Multifunctionality
    2.3 Previous Studies on Word Class Labeling in Chinese-foreign Language Dictionaries
        2.3.1 Review on Studies of Word Class Labeling in Chinese-foreign Language Dictionaries
        2.3.2 The Significance of Word Class Labeling in Chinese-foreign Dictionaries12
        2.3.3 The Principle of Translating by Word Class
        2.3.4 Previous Studies on Word Class Labeling in Chinese-French Dictionaries14
    2.4 Previous Studies on “化” lexemes
        2.4.1 Previous Studies of “化” lexemes in Modern Chinese
    2.5 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Foundation
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Theoretical Background of Two-Level Word Class Categorization Theory
        3.2.1 Language as a Complex Adaptive System
        3.2.2 Usage-Based Theory
        3.2.3 Theory of Norms and Exploitations
    3.3 Two-level Word Class Categorization in Analytic Languages
    3.4 Summary
Chapter Four Research Design
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 The Selection of Dictionaries
    4.3 The Selection of Corpora
    4.4 Data Collection
        4.4.1 Motivations of Choosing “X化” Disyllabic Lexemes
        4.4.2 Collection of “X化” Disyllabic Lexemes from GDCFC
    4.5 Data Processing
Chapter Five Results and Discussion
    5.1 Research Results
        5.1.1 Statistical Results of “X化” Disyllabic Lexemes in GDCFC
        5.1.2 Statistical Results of “X化” Disyllabic Lexemes in CCD6
        5.1.3 Comparative Statistical Results of Shared Lexemes between GDCFC and CCD6
    5.2 Discussion
        5.2.1 Exploration on the Cause of Different Word Class Labeling of “X化”Disyllabic Lexemes in GDCFC and CCD6
        5.2.2 Discussion On the Representation of Self-reference Usage of “X化 ”Disyllabic Lexemes
        5.2.3 Discussion on Word Class Labeling of “X化” Disyllabic Lexemes fromthe Perspective of Translating by Word Class
    5.3 Summary
Chapter Six Conclusion
    6.1 Major Findings of the study
    6.2 Limitations of the Study
    6.3 Suggestions for the Future Study
References
Appendices
    Appendix 1 Data of “X化” Disyllabic Lexemes in GDCFC
    Appendix 2 Comparative Data of Word Class Labeling of “X化” Disyllabic Lexemes inGDCFC and CCD6



本文編號(hào)：3849835