【摘要】：2010年6月份以后在美國(guó)上市的中國(guó)概念股因涉嫌會(huì)計(jì)違規(guī)和審計(jì)不嚴(yán)等指控，相繼陷入“被做空”的境地，股價(jià)在短時(shí)間內(nèi)跌至低谷，企業(yè)紛紛宣布停牌和退市，中概股被做空的趨勢(shì)一發(fā)不可收拾，由于影響廣泛，引起了國(guó)內(nèi)外的普遍關(guān)注。同時(shí)，中概股也遭遇了前所未有的誠(chéng)信危機(jī)，并在中概股上市公司的私有化退市過程中引發(fā)了一系列連鎖反應(yīng)，這對(duì)于正在或?qū)⒁趪?guó)外上市的中國(guó)企業(yè)而言造成了極大的影響，同時(shí)也改變了傳統(tǒng)上市資源的格局。故分析做空機(jī)構(gòu)做空中概股的手段、工具和途徑，總結(jié)中概股頻遭獵殺的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和教訓(xùn)，對(duì)中國(guó)企業(yè)應(yīng)對(duì)當(dāng)前的信任危機(jī)具有深遠(yuǎn)且重要的意義。除此之外，我們還應(yīng)該從中概股被做空的實(shí)例中吸取教訓(xùn)，進(jìn)一步深化對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)股市的改革，使我國(guó)的股票市場(chǎng)更加的符合市場(chǎng)化發(fā)展的客觀需要，最終為投融資雙方營(yíng)造公平合理的發(fā)展環(huán)境。 本文以恒大地產(chǎn)為例，運(yùn)用案例法來分析香櫞做空恒大地產(chǎn)的目的、手法、途徑；運(yùn)用因素分析法來分析恒大遭遇香櫞做空的原因；敘述了其被“做空”的全過程。筆者通過分析香櫞公司做空恒大地產(chǎn)的報(bào)告，以及對(duì)恒大地產(chǎn)的財(cái)務(wù)情況分析得出結(jié)論，恒大地產(chǎn)不存在造假，之所以被香櫞公司做空，完全是后者蓄意為之，目的就是為了從中謀取利益。另外，文章針對(duì)恒大地產(chǎn)被惡意做空這一現(xiàn)象，重點(diǎn)探討了上市公司如何避免被做空，如何應(yīng)對(duì)做空機(jī)構(gòu)的惡意做空，避免重蹈覆轍，實(shí)現(xiàn)中國(guó)概念股的良性發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Chinese stocks listed in the United States after June 2010 have been "shorted" one after another because of allegations of accounting irregularities and lax auditing. Their shares have fallen to a low point in a short period of time, and enterprises have announced suspensions and delisting. The short-selling trend is out of hand, because of the widespread impact, caused widespread concern at home and abroad. At the same time, Chinese companies also encountered an unprecedented crisis of integrity, and triggered a series of chain reactions during the process of privatizing and delisting the listed companies. This has a great impact on Chinese enterprises that are or will be listed abroad, and also changes the pattern of traditional listed resources. Therefore, it is of great significance for Chinese enterprises to deal with the current trust crisis by analyzing the means, tools and approaches of short-selling institutions and summing up the experiences and lessons of being killed frequently. In addition, we should also draw lessons from the example of shorting Chinese stocks, further deepen the reform of the domestic stock market, and make the stock market of our country more in line with the objective needs of the development of marketization. Finally, the investment and financing for both sides to create a fair and reasonable development environment. Taking Evergrande real estate as an example, this paper uses case law to analyze the purpose, technique and approach of Citron shorting Evergrande real estate; to use factor analysis method to analyze the cause of Evergrande's encounter with Citron short; and to describe the whole process of Citron shorting. By analyzing Citron's report of shorting Evergrande property and analyzing the financial situation of Evergrande property, the author concludes that Evergrande property does not exist fraud, the reason why Citron is short is the latter deliberately doing it. The aim is to profit from it. In addition, aiming at the phenomenon that Evergrande property is shorted maliciously, this paper focuses on how to avoid shorting by listed companies, how to deal with malicious shorting by short agencies, avoid repeating the same mistakes, and realize the benign development of Chinese concept stocks.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F299.233.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐叢笑;郭磊;;從國(guó)際比較看融資融券對(duì)我國(guó)證券業(yè)的影響[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年12期

2 孫海泳;;信任危機(jī)考驗(yàn)在美上市中國(guó)概念股[J];國(guó)際融資;2011年09期

3 劉華;;綠諾科技審計(jì)失敗與中國(guó)概念股信任危機(jī)[J];財(cái)務(wù)與會(huì)計(jì);2012年02期

4 余波;;中國(guó)概念股信任危機(jī)的四大成因[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年23期

5 陸勤;楊慶國(guó);;中國(guó)概念股的危機(jī)與啟示[J];重慶理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué));2013年03期

6 肖迢,周萬賀;用賣空制度抑制過度投機(jī)[J];湖北汽車工業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

7 何鋒;張宗成;;中國(guó)期貨市場(chǎng)與股票市場(chǎng)量?jī)r(jià)關(guān)系比較——基于分位回歸法的研究[J];廣東金融學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

8 任彥;;海外證券信用交易制度比較分析[J];金融法苑;2008年01期

9 駱玉鼎;廖士光;;融資買空交易流動(dòng)性效應(yīng)研究——臺(tái)灣證券市場(chǎng)經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];金融研究;2007年05期

10 程亞瓊;李一帆;;多元系中國(guó)概念股的財(cái)務(wù)黑幕[J];會(huì)計(jì)之友;2012年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2235851