本文選題：反應(yīng)過度 + 反應(yīng)不足�。� 參考：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：行為金融學(xué)認為,市場并非如有效市場假說所描述的那么有效,人也并非是完全理性的,由于信息不足、認知能力有限、過度自信等因素,股市中通常存在兩種異常的股價反應(yīng)現(xiàn)象：反應(yīng)過度和反應(yīng)不足。本文對主板、中小板和創(chuàng)業(yè)板的月度交易數(shù)據(jù)進行了反應(yīng)過度和反應(yīng)不足現(xiàn)象的實證檢驗,并且進行了橫向和縱向的比較,發(fā)現(xiàn)總體上看主板、中小板和創(chuàng)業(yè)板三大板塊都表現(xiàn)出了一定程度的反轉(zhuǎn)效應(yīng),尤其在短期內(nèi)(1個月或者2個月)存在著顯著的反應(yīng)過度現(xiàn)象；同時在考慮了市場風(fēng)險因素之后反應(yīng)過度現(xiàn)象仍然顯著存在,這進一步驗證了短期內(nèi)存在過度反應(yīng)現(xiàn)象。另外本文并沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)三大板塊存在明顯的動量效應(yīng)以及反應(yīng)不足現(xiàn)象。從三個板塊市場的橫向?qū)Ρ葋砜?中小板反應(yīng)過度現(xiàn)象最為明顯,尤其在短期內(nèi)顯著存在,有一定的“強者不強、弱者不弱”的收益特性；創(chuàng)業(yè)板市場短期的反應(yīng)過度現(xiàn)象也較為明顯,總體呈獻出“強者不強、弱者較弱”的收益特性；而以上證180為代表的主板市場的反應(yīng)過度現(xiàn)象較其他兩個板塊并不明顯,更加接近Fama的有效市場假說,并且表現(xiàn)出“強者較強、弱者不弱”的收益特性。同時,從時間維度的角度看,隨著組合形成期和檢驗期的延長,反應(yīng)過度現(xiàn)象趨于減弱,反轉(zhuǎn)投資策略的正收益在統(tǒng)計上的顯著性趨于降低。
[Abstract]:Behavioral finance believes that the market is not as efficient as the efficient market hypothesis describes, and that people are not completely rational, due to insufficient information, limited cognitive ability, overconfidence and other factors. There are usually two abnormal stock price reactions in the stock market: overreaction and underreaction. In this paper, the monthly transaction data of the main board, the small and medium-sized board and the growth enterprise board are tested by the empirical test of overreaction and underreaction, and the horizontal and vertical comparisons are made, and it is found that the main board is seen as a whole. Both the small and medium board and the growth enterprise board showed a certain degree of reversal effect, especially in the short term (1 or 2 months) there was a significant overreaction phenomenon; At the same time, after considering the market risk factors, overreaction still exists, which further verifies the existence of overreaction in the short term. In addition, there is no obvious momentum effect and insufficient reaction in the three plates. From the horizontal comparison of the three plate markets, the overreaction of small and medium-sized plates is the most obvious phenomenon, especially in the short term, there is a significant existence, there is a certain "strong not strong, weak is not weak" income characteristics; The short-term overreaction phenomenon in the gem market is also more obvious, presenting the income characteristics of "the strong are not strong, the weak are weak" as a whole, while the main board market represented by Shanghai Stock Exchange 180 is less obvious than the other two plates. It is closer to the efficient market hypothesis of Fama and shows the characteristics of "the strong are stronger, the weak are not weak". At the same time, from the point of view of time dimension, with the extension of combination formation period and test period, overreaction tends to weaken, and the positive return of reverse investment strategy tends to decrease statistically.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F832.51

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭迎賓;;反應(yīng)過度與反應(yīng)不足:論文綜述[J];北方經(jīng)濟;2010年08期

2 柴婷昱;;中國股票市場反應(yīng)過度與反應(yīng)不足的實證研究[J];商業(yè)時代;2010年24期

3 譚劍偉;魏欽溪;李檢華;;反應(yīng)過度與反應(yīng)不足:理論綜述[J];企業(yè)家天地下半月刊(理論版);2007年02期

4 胡昌生;朱迪星;;價值利潤、時變風(fēng)險與投資者反應(yīng)過度研究[J];證券市場導(dǎo)報;2010年06期

5 戴青;;投資者的過度反應(yīng)與反應(yīng)不足[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2010年32期

6 于靈;;是公眾“反應(yīng)過度”還是官員“沒良心”?[J];中國經(jīng)濟周刊;2012年11期

7 黃俊;陳平;;我國股市反應(yīng)過度與反應(yīng)不足的實證研究[J];理論月刊;2009年06期

8 李義平;;危機是一個杠桿,不能反應(yīng)過度[J];人民論壇;2012年01期

9 游家興;;誰反應(yīng)過度，誰反應(yīng)不足——投資者異質(zhì)性與收益時間可預(yù)測性分析[J];金融研究;2008年04期

10 本刊評論員;;不是盲目的樂觀主義[J];中國經(jīng)貿(mào)導(dǎo)刊;2009年19期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 水易寒;不必對清華高材生就業(yè)“反應(yīng)過度”[N];濟南日報;2013年

2 黃繼匯;不必對歐股大跌反應(yīng)過度[N];中國證券報;2008年

3 周s，

本文編號：1800129