本文選題：創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司　切入點：創(chuàng)始人　出處：《南京理工大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國深市創(chuàng)業(yè)板自創(chuàng)立以來發(fā)展迅速,09年首批上市公司數(shù)量為36家,2012年10月9日登陸創(chuàng)業(yè)板的上市公司數(shù)目已經(jīng)達到了355家。創(chuàng)業(yè)板的迅猛發(fā)展在給企業(yè)帶來眾多機遇的同時,也毫無疑問地對企業(yè)提出了更多的挑戰(zhàn)。在我國,大多數(shù)創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司中握有實際控制權的管理者往往是公司的創(chuàng)始人,他(她)們與公司戰(zhàn)略目標的制定、重大決策的審批、日常經(jīng)營活動的管理等活動密切相關,對于公司有著無法忽視的作用。由于創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司的特殊性,創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司的創(chuàng)始人往往在企業(yè)中掌握實權,導致了創(chuàng)始人對企業(yè)治理的影響更加深遠。 本文正是在這樣的背景下,對創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司創(chuàng)始人的人力資本特征進行了分析,研究了創(chuàng)始人人力資本特征對公司績效的影響�；诖�,本文在國內(nèi)外相關文獻的研究基礎上,以創(chuàng)始人創(chuàng)辦本公司的方式為標準,把創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司創(chuàng)始人分為兩類：直接創(chuàng)辦本公司的創(chuàng)始人(甲類)、通過另外一家或幾家公司間接創(chuàng)辦本公司的創(chuàng)始人(乙類),從創(chuàng)始人的個性特征(年齡變量、學歷變量)、職業(yè)特征(在本企業(yè)的工作年限、從本企業(yè)所領取的年薪、在本企業(yè)是否兼任董事長和總經(jīng)理、對本企業(yè)的控制力)、社會特征(政治關系、行業(yè)關系)三個方面展開,分別分析并比較兩種不同類型的創(chuàng)始人人力資本特征與公司績效存在什么樣的關系。 研究結果發(fā)現(xiàn)：創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司創(chuàng)始人的年齡、學歷變量與與公司績效均不顯著相關；甲類創(chuàng)始人職業(yè)特征中從本企業(yè)所領取的年薪和對本企業(yè)的控制力通過了顯著性檢驗,均與公司績效顯著正相關。而對于乙類創(chuàng)始人,其這兩項特征與公司績效均不顯著相關；兩類創(chuàng)始人的職業(yè)特征中在本企業(yè)的工作年限對公司績效有微弱的正作用,在本企業(yè)兼任兩職與公司績效有微弱的負面影響,但均不顯著；乙類創(chuàng)始人人力資本的社會特征社會關系、行業(yè)關系均通過了顯著性檢驗,其中,社會關系在10%的水平上與公司績效顯著正相關,行業(yè)關系在1%的水平上與公司績效顯著負相關。而甲類創(chuàng)始人的社會特征與公司績效的關系卻不具有統(tǒng)計性。 文章為證券監(jiān)督管理部門對創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司的評估工作提供了一定的評估依據(jù)；幫助投資者更加深入的了解創(chuàng)業(yè)板上市公司的績效情況,從而使投資者做出更加有利于自己的投資決策；同時,為創(chuàng)始人如何改善自身的相關特征從而達到優(yōu)化公司績效方面提供了相關的政策建議。
[Abstract]:The number of the first batch of listed companies in 2009 is 36, and the number of listed companies on the gem has reached 355 on October 9, 2012. The rapid development of the gem has brought many opportunities to enterprises. There is no doubt that there are more challenges to enterprises. In our country, the managers who hold the actual control of most gem listed companies are often the founders of the company, they and the strategic objectives of the company. The examination and approval of major decisions and the management of daily business activities are closely related to the company. Because of the particularity of the gem listed companies, the founders of the gem companies often hold the real power in the enterprises. This has led to a more profound impact on corporate governance by the founders. Under this background, this paper analyzes the human capital characteristics of the founders of the gem listed companies, and studies the influence of the founders' human capital characteristics on the performance of the companies. Based on the research of relevant literature at home and abroad, this paper takes the way that the founder founded the company as the standard. The founders of the gem listed companies are divided into two categories: the founders who directly establish their own company (Class A), and the founders who indirectly establish the company through another company or companies (Class B), based on the personality characteristics of the founders (age variable). Educational background variables, professional characteristics (years of service in the enterprise, annual salary received from the enterprise, whether the chairman and general manager of the enterprise are both chairman and general manager, control over the enterprise, social characteristics (political relations, political relations, etc.). It analyzes and compares the relationship between two different types of founder's human capital characteristics and corporate performance. The results show that the age, academic background variables and corporate performance of the founders of gem listed companies are not significantly related to the corporate performance, and the annual salary and the control power of class A founders from their own enterprises passed the significant test. Both of them are positively correlated with corporate performance, but for class B founders, these two characteristics are not significantly related to corporate performance, and the professional characteristics of the two types of founders have a weak positive effect on corporate performance. There is a weak negative impact on corporate performance in this enterprise, but it is not significant. The social characteristics of the human capital of class B founders, social relations, industry relations have passed the significance test, among them, Social relations are significantly positively correlated with corporate performance at the level of 10% and negatively correlated with corporate performance at the level of 1%, while the social characteristics of Class A founders are not statistically related to corporate performance. The article provides a certain evaluation basis for the securities regulatory department to evaluate the gem listed companies, and helps investors to understand the performance of gem listed companies more deeply. In order to make investors make more favorable investment decisions, at the same time, provide relevant policy advice for founders how to improve their own relevant characteristics to achieve optimal corporate performance.
【學位授予單位】：南京理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F275;F272.92;F832.51

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 朱治龍,王麗;上市公司經(jīng)營者個性特征與公司績效的相關性實證研究[J];財經(jīng)理論與實踐;2004年02期

2 鄭路航;;獨立董事的政治關聯(lián)與公司績效[J];當代經(jīng)濟管理;2010年11期

3 馮濤,李青俊;高技術企業(yè)人力資本產(chǎn)權化對企業(yè)產(chǎn)權結構和績效的影響分析[J];當代經(jīng)濟科學;2001年04期

4 朱杏珍;人力資本與企業(yè)績效[J];廣西社會科學;2003年01期

5 吳文鋒;吳沖鋒;劉曉薇;;中國民營上市公司高管的政府背景與公司價值[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2008年07期

6 余國新;程靜;張建紅;;中小板高新技術行業(yè)上市公司高管背景特征與經(jīng)營績效關系的研究[J];科技管理研究;2010年01期

7 尹飄揚;楊向陽;;人力資本和企業(yè)績效的相關性分析[J];會計之友(中旬刊);2009年05期

8 程承坪,謝科范;論企業(yè)家人力資本的開發(fā)、配置及其與企業(yè)績效關系[J];南開管理評論;2001年05期

9 魏立群,王智慧;我國上市公司高管特征與企業(yè)績效的實證研究[J];南開管理評論;2002年04期

10 丁棟虹;從人力資本到異質(zhì)型人力資本與同質(zhì)型人力資本[J];理論前沿;2001年05期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 楊揚;企業(yè)家能力與企業(yè)績效關系研究[D];蘇州大學;2012年

，

本文編號：1659308