本文關鍵詞：票據權利的善意取得制度　出處：《華東政法大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 流通性 票據權利 無權處分 善意取得

【摘要】：票據的流通性是現代票據法的靈魂，為促進流通，票據法規(guī)定了對受讓人權利的特別保護。善意取得制度作為保障交易安全、保護善意受讓人利益的重要制度，在各國票據法中均有所體現。我國《票據法》第12條對票據權利善意取得制度從反面作出了規(guī)定，但過于籠統(tǒng)，不能適應紛繁復雜的交易活動。 本文從法理學和比較法學的角度對票據權利的善意取得制度進行研究。文章除前言和結論外，主要分為四部分。第一部分為對票據權利善意取得制度的概述，介紹了票據權利善意取得的內涵、理論基礎、性質和各國立法例。第二部分從票據權利善意取得制度的特殊性出發(fā)，對其與動產善意取得制度和票據抗辯限制制度作出了比較。第三部分闡述了票據權利善意取得的構成要件，主要包括六個方面：（1）受讓人的直接前手為無權處分人；（2）轉讓方在形式上為合法持票人與實際轉讓人；（3）受讓人善意且無重大過失；（4）受讓人依照票據法規(guī)定的方式取得票據權利；（5）善意取得之票據須為可以流通的票據；（6）受讓人支付合理對價。第四部分介紹了票據權利善意取得的法律效果。受讓人善意取得票據權利屬于權利的原始取得，原權利人喪失票據權利，不得向最后善意受讓人請求返還票據。至于其是否需承擔票據責任，關鍵在于其是否在票據上為真實簽章。由于票據權利善意取得是當原權利人和善意受讓人之間的權利發(fā)生沖突時，為了維護票據的流通性，對原權利人的權利做出了犧牲，為了保證一定程度上的公平正義，法律也規(guī)定了對失票人的救濟制度。無權處分人是否需要承擔票據責任，同樣取決于其在票據上是否有真實的簽章。對于原權利人造成的損害，無處分權人應承擔相應的賠償責任。
[Abstract]:Negotiable instrument circulation is the soul of modern negotiable instrument law. In order to promote circulation, negotiable instrument law provides special protection to the transferee's rights. The system of bona fide acquisition is an important system to protect the interests of bona fide transferee. Article 12 of our country's "negotiable instrument Law" provides the system of bona fide acquisition of bill rights from the opposite side, but it is too general to adapt to the complicated transaction activities. This paper studies the system of bona fide acquisition of bill rights from the perspective of jurisprudence and comparative jurisprudence. The article is divided into four parts except preface and conclusion. The first part is an overview of bona fide acquisition system of bill rights. This paper introduces the connotation, theoretical basis, nature and legislation examples of bona fide acquisition of bill rights. The second part starts from the particularity of bona fide acquisition of bill rights. It is compared with the system of bona fide acquisition of movable property and the restriction system of bill defense. The third part expounds the constitutive requirements of bona fide acquisition of bill rights. Mainly includes six aspects: (1) the transferee's direct forehand is the person who has no right to dispose; (2) the transferor is in form the legal holder and the actual assignor; (3) the transferee is bona fide and free of gross negligence; (4) the transferee acquires the right to the instrument in the manner prescribed by the negotiable instrument law; (5) an instrument acquired in good faith shall be a negotiable instrument; Part 4th introduces the legal effect of bona fide acquisition of instrument rights. The transferee acquires instrument rights in good faith as the original acquisition of rights and the original obligee loses the rights of instruments. No request shall be made to the final bona fide transferee for the return of the instrument. The key lies in whether it is a true signature on the instrument. Because the bona fide acquisition of the bill right is to maintain the liquidity of the instrument when the rights of the original obligee and the bona fide transferee are in conflict. In order to ensure a certain degree of fairness and justice, the law also stipulates the relief system for the person who lost the ticket. It also depends on whether or not it has a true signature on the bill. For the damage caused by the original obligee, the person with nowhere to share the power should bear the corresponding compensation liability.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.287

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前6條

1 曹艷春;票據權利善意取得制度的法律探討[J];當代法學;2002年08期

2 李昕;論票據法上外觀主義的特殊表現[J];當代法學;2005年05期

3 傅鼎生;;我國票據制度未賦予交付轉讓的效力[J];法學;2009年12期

4 劉世杰;論對價[J];廣播電視大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2003年04期

5 袁碧華;;關于票據善意取得的法律思考[J];國際經貿探索;2005年05期

6 于瑩,王艷梅;票據權利善意取得三論[J];清華大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2001年03期

，

本文編號：1437080