本文選題：港口物流 + 港口物流競爭力評(píng)價(jià)　； 參考：《浙江理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：港口是海陸運(yùn)輸?shù)墓?jié)點(diǎn)，服務(wù)于資源流通，在社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)中具有重要的地位。隨著我國經(jīng)濟(jì)快速發(fā)展，沿海、沿江港口的數(shù)量和規(guī)模都有了較快的增長，港口對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的推動(dòng)不僅促進(jìn)了港口的建設(shè)開發(fā)，也帶來了港口之間的競爭。從同屬于長江三角洲經(jīng)濟(jì)圈的寧波—舟山港和上海港來看：寧波港在國際上的地位不及上海港，但擁有的水深條件是其核心競爭優(yōu)勢(shì)，2006年，寧波港與舟山港完成一體化，2011年，舟山群島新區(qū)的批復(fù)建設(shè)，都有利于寧波—舟山港整合優(yōu)勢(shì)資源，向世界級(jí)大港邁進(jìn)；上海港歷來是中國乃至國際上的重要口岸，具有區(qū)位、資源等優(yōu)勢(shì)，但水深條件一直是上海港發(fā)展的軟肋，，上海港通過在舟山建立大小洋山深水港來緩解困境。港口惡性競爭會(huì)導(dǎo)致重復(fù)建設(shè)和資源浪費(fèi)，不利于可持續(xù)發(fā)展。本文希望在港口物流競爭力分析的基礎(chǔ)上探討兩港的合作發(fā)展模式，對(duì)于兩港的未來發(fā)展和國家的戰(zhàn)略投資、決策支持都有重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義 本文針對(duì)寧波—舟山港和上海港的港口物流競爭力水平展開研究，首先構(gòu)建港口物流競爭力評(píng)價(jià)模型，確定指標(biāo)體系和評(píng)價(jià)方法，然后運(yùn)用統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)的因子分析方法，對(duì)兩港港口物流競爭力進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析，為探討兩港的合作模式提供了量化的實(shí)際參考指標(biāo)。最后，根據(jù)評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果，分析兩港之間的競爭優(yōu)勢(shì)劣勢(shì)，以及競爭關(guān)系的產(chǎn)生，并提出以戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟為核心的合作模式。 本文的結(jié)論包括三個(gè)方面。第一，確立了包括港口物流營運(yùn)規(guī)模、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施、管理狀況、腹地經(jīng)濟(jì)水平及發(fā)展?jié)摿Φ任鍌�(gè)方面20項(xiàng)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的港口物流競爭力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。第二，基于因子分析法的港口物流競爭力評(píng)價(jià)模型的構(gòu)建與實(shí)證分析，上海港在營運(yùn)規(guī)模、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施、管理狀況、腹地經(jīng)濟(jì)水平的得分都高于寧波—舟山港，而寧波—舟山港在發(fā)展?jié)摿安糠旨?xì)分指標(biāo)上的得分高于上海港。第三，提出以戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟為核心的合作模式，包括合作規(guī)則、戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟制度以及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制三方面。本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)主要體現(xiàn)在港口物流競爭力評(píng)價(jià)體系的設(shè)計(jì)、以戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟為核心的合作模式兩方面。
[Abstract]:As the node of land and sea transportation, port serves the circulation of resources and plays an important role in social economy. With the rapid development of our country's economy, the quantity and scale of the ports along the Yangtze River have increased rapidly. The promotion of the port to the economy has not only promoted the construction and development of the port, but also brought about the competition between the ports. From the point of view of Ningbo Zhoushan Port and Shanghai Port, which belong to the same economic circle of the Yangtze River Delta, Ningbo Port is not as important as Shanghai Port in the world, but its core competitive advantage is the water depth condition. In 2006, Ningbo Port and Zhoushan Port were integrated into one another. In 2011, The approval and construction of the new Zhoushan Archipelago area will be conducive to the integration of Ningbo and Zhoushan Port into a world-class port. The Shanghai Port has always been an important port in China and even internationally, with advantages in location, resources, and so on. But the condition of water depth has always been the weakness of the development of Shanghai Port, which can alleviate the difficulties by setting up the large and small Yangshan Deep Water Port in Zhoushan. Port vicious competition will lead to repeated construction and waste of resources, which is not conducive to sustainable development. Based on the analysis of port logistics competitiveness, this paper hopes to discuss the development mode of cooperation between the two ports, which has important practical significance for the future development of the two ports and the strategic investment of the country. In this paper, the level of port logistics competitiveness of Ningbo Zhoushan Port and Shanghai Port is studied. Firstly, the evaluation model of port logistics competitiveness is constructed, the index system and evaluation method are determined, and then the statistical factor analysis method is used. The empirical analysis of the logistics competitiveness of the two ports provides a quantitative reference index for the discussion of the cooperation mode between the two ports. Finally, according to the evaluation results, this paper analyzes the competitive advantages and disadvantages between the two ports, as well as the emergence of the competitive relationship, and puts forward a cooperation model with strategic alliance as the core. The conclusion of this paper includes three aspects. Firstly, 20 evaluation indexes including port logistics operation scale, infrastructure, management status, hinterland economic level and development potential are established, and the evaluation index system of port logistics competitiveness is established. Second, the construction and empirical analysis of the evaluation model of port logistics competitiveness based on factor analysis show that the scores of Shanghai Port in the scale of operation, infrastructure, management status, economic level in hinterland are higher than those in Ningbo-Zhoushan Port. Ningbo-Zhoushan Port has higher development potential and subdivision index than Shanghai Port. Thirdly, it puts forward the cooperation mode with strategic alliance as the core, including three aspects: cooperation rules, strategic alliance system and risk control. The innovation of this paper is mainly reflected in the design of the evaluation system of port logistics competitiveness and the cooperation mode with strategic alliance as the core.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F552.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李玲;;淺析區(qū)域港口競合模式與機(jī)制[J];中國儲(chǔ)運(yùn);2011年04期

2 朱道立;吉阿兵;;港口價(jià)格競爭策略研究[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2006年05期

3 羅旋;;基于第四代港口概念的港口競合發(fā)展[J];港口經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年02期

4 趙相英;;傳統(tǒng)港口物流向現(xiàn)代港口物流發(fā)展的特征[J];中國港口;2008年04期

5 俞海宏;王曉萍;;基于競合博弈的長三角港口關(guān)系探討[J];中國港口;2010年09期

6 李超 ,張罕育;競爭合作:港口發(fā)展新趨勢(shì)[J];中國經(jīng)貿(mào);2004年07期

7 王曉萍;應(yīng)奇君;;合作競爭,實(shí)現(xiàn)雙贏——寧波—舟山港與上海港集裝箱運(yùn)輸?shù)母偤蟍J];經(jīng)營與管理;2009年09期

8 真虹;中國集裝箱港口競爭現(xiàn)狀與趨勢(shì)[J];集裝箱化;2004年04期

9 姚列鐘;;寧波——舟山港與上海港的競爭態(tài)勢(shì)及寧波——舟山港的應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];集裝箱化;2011年02期

10 李緯韜;港口企業(yè)經(jīng)營競爭力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系[J];交通科技與經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 孫正;基于競合戰(zhàn)略的青島港物流整合研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2010年

2 肖海輝;珠三角與長三角港口物流競爭力比較研究[D];廣東商學(xué)院;2011年

3 聶琦;論港口在現(xiàn)代物流中的地位和作用[D];上海海運(yùn)學(xué)院;2000年

4 陸成云;港口競爭力評(píng)價(jià)模型的構(gòu)建及應(yīng)用[D];上海海事大學(xué);2003年

5 徐風(fēng)光;港口競爭力評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2005年

6 何鑫;我國主要港口物流競爭分析與評(píng)價(jià)[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2006年

7 曹海龍;港口物流系統(tǒng)構(gòu)建及評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2007年

8 余科輝;滬甬兩港合作競爭戰(zhàn)略探究[D];上海海事大學(xué);2007年

9 陳淼;港口群內(nèi)港口競爭與合作研究[D];上海海事大學(xué);2007年

10 闞春燕;南通港口競爭力評(píng)價(jià)及提升策略研究[D];南京理工大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：1903864