鐵路運輸客運業(yè)務內部清算定價機制研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-05-09 22:33
本文選題:鐵路 + 客運。 參考:《北京交通大學》2014年碩士論文
【摘要】:2013年3月,中國鐵路總公司正式成立并全面承擔企業(yè)職責,標志著國有鐵路改革的大幕全面拉開。同時,鐵道部提出了鼓勵和引導民間資本依法合規(guī)進入鐵路領域的規(guī)劃。在這樣的開放背景下,形成一套合理的內部清算價格定價機制,建立公平、公正、公開的清算價格體系顯得尤為重要。 科學的鐵路運輸內部清算定價體系要解決兩個問題,一是保證運輸企業(yè)能夠按清算規(guī)則取得與運輸數量和質量相對應的進款收入;二是保證各運輸企業(yè)相互提供服務的運輸成本能夠得到合理補償。隨著旅客運輸清算系統(tǒng)的投入運行和不斷完善,現(xiàn)行清算方法已經能夠較好地解決客運進款的合理分配,但是由于其對客運業(yè)務作業(yè)鏈的劃分并不合理,導致鐵路運輸企業(yè)間相互提供服務按作業(yè)清算時運輸成本補償并不完善。 基于上述現(xiàn)狀,本文采用規(guī)范研究和案例研究相結合的方式,綜合運用比較分析方法針對鐵路運輸客運業(yè)務內部清算定價機制進行研究。在重視迎合市場、遵循企業(yè)總體戰(zhàn)略、兼顧公平和效益的總原則下,對客運業(yè)務作業(yè)鏈進行了重新梳理和劃分,將全部清算內容劃分為代理服務、站(場)服務、線路及設施服務、牽引服務、運載工具服務及綜合服務等六塊內容,每塊清算內容又包含若干清算項目,總計17個清算項目,并在綜合考慮其清算特點、發(fā)生頻率以及交易的普遍性程度等因素后確定其內部轉移定價方法,最終確定采用市場基礎定價項目1項,協(xié)議定價項目3項,成本基礎定價13項,其中變動成本定價2項,實際成本定價11項,最終建立起新的鐵路運輸客運業(yè)務內部清算定價機制,并對各清算項目的清算單價指標體系作了界定。最后在總結本文研究結果的基礎上提出了一些十分有價值但本文尚未研究的問題,希望對后續(xù)研究提供一定的啟示。
[Abstract]:In March 2013, the China Railway General Company was formally established and fully assumed the responsibility of the enterprise, which marked the opening of the reform of the state-owned railway. At the same time, the Ministry of Railways proposed the plan to encourage and guide the compliance of private capital into the railway field according to the law. In this open context, a set of reasonable pricing mechanism for internal liquidation was built. Setting up a fair, just and open liquidation price system is particularly important.
Two problems should be solved in the scientific railway transportation internal liquidation pricing system. One is to ensure that the transportation enterprises can obtain the income income corresponding to the quantity and quality of transportation according to the liquidation rules; the two is to ensure the reasonable compensation for the transportation cost of each transportation enterprise providing service to each other. With the input of the passenger transportation clearing system, the transportation cost can be reasonably compensated. With the continuous improvement, the current liquidation method has been able to solve the reasonable allocation of passenger transport funds. However, because the division of the operation chain is not reasonable, it is not perfect for the railway transportation enterprises to provide services to each other in accordance with the liquidation of the operation.
Based on the above situation, this paper uses a combination of normative research and case study to study the internal liquidation pricing mechanism of railway transport service by the method of comparative analysis. The passenger service operation chain is renewed under the general principle of catering to the market, following the overall strategy of the enterprise and taking into account the fairness and efficiency. The total liquidation content is divided into six parts, namely, agency service, station (field) service, line and facility service, traction service, carrier service and comprehensive service. Each liquidation content includes a number of liquidation items, with a total of 17 liquidation items, and a comprehensive consideration of its liquidation characteristics, frequency and universality of the transaction. Degree and other factors determine its internal transfer pricing method, and finally determine 1 items of market base pricing projects, 3 items of agreement pricing projects and 13 cost base pricing, including 2 variable cost pricing and 11 actual cost pricing. Finally, a new internal clearing pricing mechanism for railway transport passenger service is established, and the liquidation of various liquidation projects is settled. The unit price index system is defined. Finally, on the basis of the summary of the results of this study, some valuable but not yet studied problems are put forward, hoping to provide some inspiration for the follow-up study.
【學位授予單位】:北京交通大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:F530.68;F532
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前6條
1 崔永梅;鐵路客貨線路使用費定價的研究[J];北方交通大學學報;2001年05期
2 馮麗霞;王力;;負激勵機制下內部協(xié)商定價的博弈分析[J];財會通訊(學術版);2008年04期
3 宋亮亮;壟斷市場情況下企業(yè)中間產品的內部轉移定價分析[J];科技和產業(yè);2005年07期
4 來慶泉,趙童,蔡蔚,羊利鋒;軌道交通線路使用費制度比較研究[J];城市軌道交通研究;2005年05期
5 李岱安;;我國鐵路基礎設施定價問題的研究[J];綜合運輸;2006年07期
6 汪賢裕,肖玉明,鐘勝;企業(yè)內的價格歧視與內部轉移定價[J];中國管理科學;2001年06期
,本文編號:1867739
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/jtysjj/1867739.html