本文選題：海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易 + 支配權(quán)　； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國加入WTO以來,隨著參與經(jīng)濟全球化進(jìn)程的加深,我國外貿(mào)進(jìn)出口總額呈現(xiàn)迅猛發(fā)展的態(tài)勢。在我國貨物貿(mào)易快速發(fā)展的同時,服務(wù)貿(mào)易也得到較快發(fā)展。作為傳統(tǒng)優(yōu)勢產(chǎn)業(yè)的海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易也得到了快速的發(fā)展,目前我國已成為世界海運大國。但是在海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易發(fā)展的過程中,我國仍面臨著諸多的問題,尤其與國際海運強國相比,我國海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易和海運業(yè)仍處于相對弱勢地位。并且隨著入世承諾的履行,我國的海運服務(wù)業(yè)的開放程度已經(jīng)處于世界前沿,甚至超過部分歐美發(fā)達(dá)國家,因此,我國海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易將面臨著競爭更加激烈的市場環(huán)境。綜上可見,我國海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易可能面臨著海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易資源不能有效配置,支配權(quán)水平偏低,發(fā)展受到嚴(yán)重挑戰(zhàn)的局面。本文則是從支配權(quán)的角度來考察我國海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易的現(xiàn)狀與存在的問題。為進(jìn)一步研究海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易相關(guān)問題提供借鑒與參考。 本文首先對海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易支配權(quán)相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行了界定。根據(jù)了海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易相關(guān)概念,結(jié)合民法中支配權(quán)概念的使用,提出了海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易支配權(quán)概念,并根據(jù)支配權(quán)表現(xiàn)形式上的分類,將海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易支配權(quán)分為資源實力要素、國際環(huán)境要素及技術(shù)實力要素三個方面,并分別進(jìn)行闡述。一個國家的支配權(quán)水平高低,不僅取決于可支配資源的多少,也決定于能否正確配置資源,行使支配權(quán)力。本文的第三章,對我國海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易支配權(quán)現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析,并揭示出我國海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易支配權(quán)所存在的問題。 本文主要運用了層次分析法及證據(jù)推理法兩種方法對海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易支配權(quán)構(gòu)成因素進(jìn)行定量分析。使用層次分析法結(jié)合專家打分,對海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易支配權(quán)構(gòu)成因素進(jìn)行賦值權(quán)重。另外,運用證據(jù)推理法,根據(jù)定量和定性數(shù)據(jù),對我國及另外11個海運大國的海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易支配權(quán)進(jìn)行評分。并進(jìn)行比較分析,解釋我國海運服務(wù)貿(mào)易支配權(quán)存在的問題。
[Abstract]:Since China's entry into WTO, with the deepening of economic globalization, the total import and export of China's foreign trade has been developing rapidly. With the rapid development of China's trade in goods, trade in services has also developed rapidly. Seaborne service trade, as a traditional advantage industry, has also been developed rapidly. At present, China has become a big shipping country in the world. However, in the process of the development of marine service trade, China is still facing many problems, especially compared with the international shipping power, China's maritime services trade and shipping industry are still in a relatively weak position. With the implementation of WTO commitments, the opening degree of China's maritime services has been in the forefront of the world, even more than some developed countries in Europe and the United States. Therefore, China's seaborne service trade will face a more competitive market environment. It can be seen that China's marine service trade may be faced with the situation that the resources of seaborne service trade can not be effectively allocated, the level of control power is on the low side, and the development of seaborne service trade is seriously challenged. This paper examines the status quo and existing problems of China's maritime trade in services from the perspective of dominance. It provides reference and reference for further research on issues related to maritime trade in services. At first, this paper defines the concept of the right to control maritime trade in services. According to the concept of maritime trade in services, combined with the use of the concept of dominance in the civil law, this paper puts forward the concept of dominance of maritime trade in services, and according to the classification of the form of the power of control, it divides the dominating power of maritime trade in services into the elements of resource strength. International environmental factor and technical strength factor three aspects, and separately carries on elaboration. The level of dominating power in a country depends not only on the number of disposable resources, but also on whether or not to allocate resources correctly and exercise the dominating power. In the third chapter, the author analyzes the current situation of China's maritime services trade control, and reveals the existing problems of China's maritime services trade dominance. In this paper, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and evidential reasoning method are used to quantitatively analyze the factors that constitute the dominating power of maritime service trade. This paper uses AHP and experts to assign weight to the components of maritime service trade. In addition, according to the quantitative and qualitative data, the control power of maritime trade in China and the other 11 major maritime countries is evaluated by using the evidence reasoning method. And carries on the comparative analysis, explains our country maritime transport service trade control right existence question.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F752.68;F552

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 于立新;開放中國航運服務(wù)貿(mào)易市場的思考[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;1999年10期

2 任強;;當(dāng)前我國海運業(yè)的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r與對策[J];大陸橋視野;2010年08期

3 鄔關(guān)榮;析海運費上漲對我國出口貿(mào)易的影響及對策[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)實務(wù);1999年09期

4 張明偉;;由一則案例淺析FOB價格術(shù)語下出口企業(yè)海運費用風(fēng)險[J];對外經(jīng)貿(mào)實務(wù);2008年09期

5 張金v，

本文編號：1849267