本文選題：鐵路企業(yè) + 績效評(píng)估�。� 參考：《中南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：摘要：2013年3月,中國鐵路實(shí)行了政企分開的管理體制改革,鐵路企業(yè)被賦予了真正的市場(chǎng)主體地位。新時(shí)期,面對(duì)更加復(fù)雜多變的內(nèi)外環(huán)境,鐵路企業(yè)如何提升經(jīng)營管理水平、發(fā)掘自身優(yōu)勢(shì)與不足、統(tǒng)籌兼顧經(jīng)濟(jì)效益和社會(huì)效益、協(xié)調(diào)好各利益相關(guān)者的需求,將成為鐵路企業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵�；诖�,本文提出針對(duì)鐵路企業(yè)經(jīng)營績效評(píng)估的研究探討,具有一定的理論和實(shí)踐意義。 論文基于平衡計(jì)分卡,從財(cái)務(wù)、客戶、內(nèi)部業(yè)務(wù)流程、學(xué)習(xí)與創(chuàng)新、社會(huì)貢獻(xiàn)五個(gè)維度,采用定性和定量指標(biāo)篩選方法,構(gòu)建了鐵路企業(yè)經(jīng)營績效評(píng)估指標(biāo)體系。 在分析闡述現(xiàn)有指標(biāo)權(quán)重確定方法及其優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)、適用范圍的基礎(chǔ)上,選取主觀賦權(quán)法—AHP和客觀賦權(quán)法—熵值法,并引入修正系數(shù),將兩者結(jié)合起來,從而形成一種組合賦權(quán)法對(duì)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行賦權(quán),克服了傳統(tǒng)單一賦權(quán)法的缺陷。 此外,論文運(yùn)用極值法和功效系數(shù)變換法對(duì)指標(biāo)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行預(yù)處理,同時(shí)提出應(yīng)用區(qū)間評(píng)分法和集值統(tǒng)計(jì)理論進(jìn)行定性指標(biāo)的定量化處理；最后,論文結(jié)合上述研究內(nèi)容,構(gòu)建了基于組合賦權(quán)和TOPSIS法的鐵路企業(yè)經(jīng)營績效評(píng)估模型,并通過實(shí)例驗(yàn)證了模型的有效性。
[Abstract]:Abstract: in March 2013, China Railway carried out the reform of management system of separating government from enterprise, and railway enterprises were given the status of real market main body.In the new era, facing the more complex and changeable internal and external environment, how to improve the management level of railway enterprises, explore their own advantages and disadvantages, balance economic and social benefits, and coordinate the needs of all stakeholders,It will become the key to the sustainable development of railway enterprises.Based on this, this paper puts forward the research on railway enterprise performance evaluation, which has certain theoretical and practical significance.Based on the balanced Scorecard, this paper constructs the performance evaluation index system of railway enterprises from five dimensions: finance, customer, internal business process, learning and innovation, and social contribution.On the basis of analyzing and expounding the existing index weight determination methods and their advantages and disadvantages, the subjective weighting method -AHP and the objective weighting method-entropy method are selected, and the modified coefficient is introduced to combine the two methods.Thus, a combined weighting method is formed, which overcomes the limitation of traditional single weighting method.In addition, the paper uses extreme value method and efficiency coefficient transformation method to preprocess the index data, and puts forward the application of interval scoring method and set value statistical theory to the qualitative index quantitative processing. Finally, the paper combines the above research content,The performance evaluation model of railway enterprises based on combination weighting and TOPSIS method is constructed, and the validity of the model is verified by an example.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F532.6;F272.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭雪萌,丁海芬;現(xiàn)代鐵路運(yùn)輸企業(yè)效績?cè)u(píng)價(jià)體系研究[J];北京交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期

2 陳團(tuán)生;;基于交叉數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)法的鐵路運(yùn)營績效評(píng)價(jià)[J];北京交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

3 宋之杰,高曉紅;一種多指標(biāo)綜合評(píng)價(jià)中確定指標(biāo)權(quán)重的方法[J];燕山大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

4 周凌;黎榮芳;;基于突變理論的鐵路運(yùn)輸企業(yè)經(jīng)營績效評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2010年32期

5 陳驥;;基于集值統(tǒng)計(jì)的科研項(xiàng)目立項(xiàng)評(píng)審方法及其應(yīng)用[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2011年19期

6 張佳;蔡曉旭;;基于因子分析法的鐵路運(yùn)輸上市公司績效評(píng)價(jià)——以大秦鐵路為例[J];會(huì)計(jì)之友;2012年21期

7 范柏乃,單世濤,陸長生;城市技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)篩選方法研究[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2002年06期

8 李君;雷定猷;;基于DEA的鐵路貨場(chǎng)運(yùn)營績效評(píng)價(jià)的研究[J];鐵道貨運(yùn);2007年04期

9 李晉;;基于鐵路多元經(jīng)營企業(yè)雙重屬性的績效評(píng)價(jià)方法研究[J];鐵道經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年04期

10 王嬙;;中國鐵路政企分開后債務(wù)消化的思考[J];中國市場(chǎng);2013年18期

，

本文編號(hào)：1750254