本文選題：創(chuàng)意集群 + 創(chuàng)意園區(qū)　； 參考：《科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策》2012年06期

【摘要】：選擇屬于潛在集群和政策導(dǎo)向集群集合體的上海創(chuàng)意園區(qū)和屬于工作集群的倫敦藝術(shù)工作室作為比較對(duì)象,創(chuàng)意園區(qū)和藝術(shù)工作室分別是上海和倫敦創(chuàng)意集聚的主要表現(xiàn)形式,通過(guò)對(duì)兩個(gè)城市創(chuàng)意集群所有權(quán)、公共服務(wù)、融資方式和管理體系的比較,分析上海與倫敦城市創(chuàng)意集群在運(yùn)營(yíng)模式上存在的差異,并對(duì)差異產(chǎn)生的原因進(jìn)行分析,最后結(jié)合本土文化和經(jīng)濟(jì)模式,提出上海創(chuàng)意集群發(fā)展建議。
[Abstract]:Shanghai Creative Park, which belongs to potential cluster and policy-oriented cluster, and London Art Studio, which belong to work cluster, are chosen as the comparative objects. Creative Park and Art Studio are the main forms of creative agglomeration in Shanghai and London, respectively. By comparing the ownership, public service, financing mode and management system of the two urban creative clusters, this paper analyzes the differences between Shanghai and London urban creative clusters, and analyzes the causes of the differences. Finally, combined with local culture and economic model, the author puts forward some suggestions for the development of Shanghai creative cluster.
【作者單位】： 東華大學(xué)旭日工商管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(70873018)
【分類號(hào)】：F719

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉景;上海創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)載體優(yōu)化研究[D];上海戲劇學(xué)院;2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1972398