上海大都市區(qū)知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)的空間分布及其影響因素
本文選題:知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè) + 咨詢行業(yè)。 參考:《華東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:縱觀全球城市的發(fā)展歷程,必然與產(chǎn)業(yè)升級之路密切相關(guān),知識經(jīng)濟(jì)已成為西方發(fā)達(dá)國家的一些都市區(qū)的重要特征,城市內(nèi),不論在制造業(yè)還是服務(wù)業(yè)方面都在向知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)部門轉(zhuǎn)移;高學(xué)歷人才的培養(yǎng)、知識技術(shù)的不斷創(chuàng)新是這些地區(qū)發(fā)展知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)的基礎(chǔ),同時這些地區(qū)也占據(jù)著產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈的頂端,并因此創(chuàng)造了大量的財富,影響著全球產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r和方向。知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)的高附加值優(yōu)勢往往比較明顯,可以很大程度上帶動區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展,因此積極向這類產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移逐漸成為發(fā)展中國家的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級的目標(biāo);上世紀(jì)90年代以來,我國大都市區(qū)如北京、上海等開始了以三產(chǎn)為主的時代,同時在制造業(yè)方面也不斷向高技術(shù)含量的產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展,21世紀(jì)后,持續(xù)的產(chǎn)業(yè)升級以及行業(yè)分工使我國大城市開始轉(zhuǎn)向知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè),上海不僅作為我國的經(jīng)濟(jì)中心,同時也是全國重要的知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)基地,擁有良好產(chǎn)業(yè)基礎(chǔ)的同時,又有著數(shù)量眾多的高校和科研機構(gòu),這都為上海都市區(qū)知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展提供了良好的前提條件。但目前國內(nèi)關(guān)于知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)在大都市尺度分布的研究稍有不足,而且隨著城市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的推動,如何使知識密集型制造業(yè)和知識密集型服務(wù)業(yè)在大都市內(nèi)協(xié)同發(fā)展也漸漸成為學(xué)者們關(guān)注的新熱點;诖,本文參照城市地理學(xué)及新經(jīng)濟(jì)地理學(xué)的理論和方法,在知識密集型制造業(yè)和服務(wù)業(yè)中各選一案例——醫(yī)藥制造業(yè)和咨詢行業(yè)為研究對象,首先利用第二次和第三次經(jīng)濟(jì)普查數(shù)據(jù),通過Arcgis軟件,分析2008年、2012年時兩個行業(yè)的企業(yè)在上海大都市區(qū)的空間分布規(guī)律,并分析08-12年間新增企業(yè)的空間分布情況,探究兩個行業(yè)的空間分布演化規(guī)律;進(jìn)一步利用計量方法探討兩個行業(yè)空間分布影響因子的變動情況;最后分別從從產(chǎn)業(yè)和空間兩個視角來探究上海都市區(qū)知識密集型制造業(yè)和服務(wù)業(yè)的協(xié)同發(fā)展?fàn)顩r。通過文章的分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)上海醫(yī)藥制造業(yè)在都市外圍部分地區(qū)集中布局,而咨詢行業(yè)整體上呈現(xiàn)向心型分布,在外圍地區(qū)也有小規(guī)模集中布局的現(xiàn)象,但兩個行業(yè)均有進(jìn)一步郊區(qū)化的趨勢,這也導(dǎo)致兩個行業(yè)的集聚程度均出現(xiàn)了下降,但這沒有從本質(zhì)上改變咨詢行業(yè)在市區(qū)內(nèi)的集聚程度要遠(yuǎn)高于醫(yī)藥行業(yè)的情況。在空間分布的影響因素中,良好的政策環(huán)境對兩個行業(yè)均有促進(jìn)作用,醫(yī)藥企業(yè)特別重視人才科研資源,而咨詢企業(yè)則重視城市化集聚因素并能夠承受較高地租。通過對知識密集型制造業(yè)和知識密集型服務(wù)業(yè)的案例分析的,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)這兩者不論是在產(chǎn)業(yè)分工協(xié)作方面、還是空間分布及其影響因素方面,都在上海大都市區(qū)內(nèi)部呈現(xiàn)出了較為良好的協(xié)同發(fā)展?fàn)顩r。
[Abstract]:Throughout the development of global cities, it is bound to be closely related to the road of industrial upgrading. Knowledge economy has become an important feature of some metropolitan areas in western developed countries. Both manufacturing and service industries are shifting to knowledge-intensive industries; the training of highly educated personnel and the continuous innovation of knowledge and technology are the basis for developing knowledge-intensive industries in these areas. At the same time, these regions also occupy the top of the industrial chain, and thus create a lot of wealth, affecting the development of global industry and direction. The high value-added advantages of knowledge-intensive industries are often more obvious, which can promote regional economic development to a large extent. Therefore, actively transferring to these industries has gradually become the target of upgrading industrial structure in developing countries; since the 1990s, China's metropolitan areas, such as Beijing and Shanghai, have begun an era of three industries, and at the same time, in the manufacturing sector, they have been continuously developing into high-tech industries after the 21st century. The continuous industrial upgrading and industrial division of labor has led to the shift of large cities to knowledge-intensive industries. Shanghai is not only the economic center of our country, but also an important knowledge-intensive industrial base in the country, and has a good industrial base at the same time. There are also a large number of universities and scientific research institutions, which provide a good prerequisite for the development of knowledge-intensive industries in Shanghai metropolitan area. However, the current domestic research on the distribution of knowledge-intensive industries on a metropolitan scale is slightly inadequate, and with the development of urban economy, How to make the knowledge-intensive manufacturing industry and knowledge-intensive service industry co-develop in the metropolis has gradually become a new hot spot that scholars pay attention to. Based on this, according to the theories and methods of urban geography and new economic geography, this paper chooses one case in the knowledge-intensive manufacturing industry and one case in the service industry-pharmaceutical manufacturing and consulting industry as the research object. First, using the data of the second and third economic census, through Arcgis software, this paper analyzes the spatial distribution of enterprises in Shanghai metropolitan area in 2008 and 2012, and analyzes the spatial distribution of newly added enterprises in 2008 and 12. Explore the evolution law of spatial distribution of the two industries, further use the measurement method to explore the change of the influencing factors of the spatial distribution of the two industries; Finally, from the perspective of industry and space, this paper probes into the coordinated development of knowledge intensive manufacturing and service industry in Shanghai metropolitan area. Through the analysis of the article, it is found that the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry in Shanghai is concentrated in some parts of the city periphery, while the consulting industry as a whole presents a concentric distribution, and there is also a phenomenon of small-scale centralized distribution in the peripheral areas. However, both industries have a trend of further suburbanization, which also leads to a decline in the degree of agglomeration in both industries, but this does not change the nature of the concentration of the consulting industry in the urban areas is much higher than the situation of the pharmaceutical industry. Among the influencing factors of spatial distribution, good policy environment promotes both industries. Pharmaceutical enterprises attach great importance to scientific research resources of talents, while consulting enterprises attach importance to urbanization agglomeration factors and can afford higher land rent. Through the case study of knowledge-intensive manufacturing and knowledge-intensive services, it can be found that both of them are in terms of industrial division and collaboration, spatial distribution and their influencing factors. Both in Shanghai metropolitan area presents a relatively good coordinated development situation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:F427;F719
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 ;知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)[J];銀行與企業(yè);1984年07期
2 陳平;;用戰(zhàn)略眼光重視發(fā)展軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)[J];未來與發(fā)展;1984年03期
3 易培強;隆江;;知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展和對策初探[J];湖南師大學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1985年04期
4 許強;高汝熹;;知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)的運行機理和發(fā)展規(guī)則[J];探索與爭鳴;2007年10期
5 趙小威;;試論知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)的內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)特點[J];黨政論壇;1987年08期
6 仇維驥;;勞動密集型、資本(資金)密集型和知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)[J];會計之友;1991年01期
7 許強;;知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)評價指標(biāo)體系和定量模型構(gòu)建[J];商業(yè)時代;2007年33期
8 姜春明;日本的知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)與尖端技術(shù)的發(fā)展動向[J];現(xiàn)代日本經(jīng)濟(jì);1984年03期
9 高汝熹;許強;;上海知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)評價研究——基于主成分分析法的實證[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年07期
10 ;何謂高技術(shù)[J];林業(yè)機械;1992年06期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前5條
1 張向?qū)?信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)導(dǎo)致知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)遷移[N];計算機世界;2002年
2 張向?qū)?機會在哪里[N];中國高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)導(dǎo)報;2002年
3 非常易信息技術(shù)有限公司董事長張向?qū)?中國機會在哪里[N];中華工商時報;2002年
4 天玉街;企業(yè)要抓住環(huán)境問題下的發(fā)展契機[N];中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)報;2014年
5 致公黨浦東新區(qū)委員會;讓海歸創(chuàng)業(yè)感受“家”的服務(wù)[N];聯(lián)合時報;2014年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 許強;知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)評價和發(fā)展研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2007年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 李煜;上海大都市區(qū)知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)的空間分布及其影響因素[D];華東師范大學(xué);2017年
2 熊吉;知識密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)集群中組織間知識轉(zhuǎn)移的系統(tǒng)動力分析[D];華中師范大學(xué);2013年
,本文編號:1936151
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/fwjj/1936151.html