基于博弈模型的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚機理研究
本文選題:生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚 切入點:區(qū)位價值 出處:《華東理工大學》2012年碩士論文
【摘要】:隨著我國工業(yè)化和城市化進程的不斷加快,生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的集聚格局、集聚效應(yīng)日益顯現(xiàn),已成為區(qū)域或城市經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的主要動力之一。生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚是新企業(yè)區(qū)位選擇的結(jié)果,新企業(yè)選擇獲得最大集聚效應(yīng)的區(qū)位點,所有集聚企業(yè)的空間布局便構(gòu)成了產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的空間特征,因此可從企業(yè)的區(qū)位選擇視角揭示生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚機理。 本文首先從Marshall Wood的“影響服務(wù)業(yè)集聚的區(qū)位因素主要包括可達性、接近性和環(huán)境相關(guān)性”觀點出發(fā),結(jié)合產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚理論和服務(wù)業(yè)區(qū)位理論,提取可達性、接近性、經(jīng)濟環(huán)境、商務(wù)環(huán)境和人力資源環(huán)境五個區(qū)位指標,采用效用函數(shù)綜合評價方法,度量生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚區(qū)的區(qū)位價值。然后,從新企業(yè)進入行為出發(fā),引入?yún)^(qū)位價值,分別建立了在位企業(yè)和新企業(yè)在服務(wù)產(chǎn)品市場份額之間的Stackelberg博弈模型、在位企業(yè)開放技術(shù)時的Stackelberg博弈模型以及新企業(yè)與政府之間的演化博弈模型,來闡釋生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚機理。 研究結(jié)果表明:當生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚區(qū)的區(qū)位價值小于0.31386時,完全理性新企業(yè)可以選擇進入集聚區(qū);當區(qū)位價值大于0.8時,新企業(yè)只有在在位企業(yè)對其開放技術(shù)時才能選擇進入集聚區(qū);當區(qū)位價值介于0.31386~0.8時,新企業(yè)只有在政府支持下才能選擇進入集聚區(qū)。 最后,結(jié)合中國12個城市的金融業(yè)、軟件業(yè)和物流業(yè)三類生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚區(qū)數(shù)據(jù),不僅驗證了Marshall Wood關(guān)于影響服務(wù)業(yè)集聚的區(qū)位因素的命題,還聯(lián)系集聚區(qū)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀驗證博弈模型,并給出相應(yīng)的政策建議。
[Abstract]:With the accelerating process of industrialization and urbanization in China, the agglomeration pattern of producer services and the agglomeration effect are becoming more and more obvious. Producer services agglomeration is the result of the location selection of new enterprises. The spatial distribution of all agglomeration enterprises constitutes the spatial characteristics of industrial agglomeration, so the agglomeration mechanism of producer services can be revealed from the perspective of enterprise location selection. Firstly, from the view of Marshall Wood's "the location factors affecting service agglomeration mainly include accessibility, proximity and environmental correlation", combining the theory of industrial agglomeration and the location theory of service industry, this paper extracts the reachability, proximity and economic environment. Five regional indicators of business environment and human resource environment are used to measure the location value of producer services agglomeration area by using the utility function comprehensive evaluation method, and then, starting from the new enterprise's entry behavior, the location value is introduced. The Stackelberg game model between the incumbent enterprise and the new enterprise in the service product market share, the Stackelberg game model with the open technology of the incumbent enterprise and the evolutionary game model between the new enterprise and the government are established respectively. To explain the producer services agglomeration mechanism. The results show that when the location value of producer services agglomeration area is less than 0.31386, the completely rational new enterprise can choose to enter the agglomeration area, and when the location value is greater than 0.8, The new enterprise can enter the agglomeration area only when the incumbent enterprise is open to it's technology, and when the location value is between 0.31386 and 0.8, the new enterprise can only choose to enter the agglomeration area with the support of the government. Finally, combining with the data of three types of producer service agglomeration areas in 12 cities of China, including financial industry, software industry and logistics industry, not only does Marshall Wood prove the proposition of location factors affecting service industry agglomeration, The game model is verified with the development of agglomeration area, and the corresponding policy suggestions are given.
【學位授予單位】:華東理工大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:F719;F224.32
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 趙群毅;;北京生產(chǎn)者服務(wù)業(yè)空間變動的特征與模式——基于單位普查數(shù)據(jù)的分析[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2007年04期
2 李普峰;李同升;;西安市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)空間格局及其機制分析[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2009年03期
3 趙群毅;周一星;;北京都市區(qū)生產(chǎn)者服務(wù)業(yè)的空間結(jié)構(gòu)——兼與西方主流觀點的比較[J];城市規(guī)劃;2007年05期
4 陳前虎;徐鑫;帥慧敏;;杭州城市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)空間演化研究[J];城市規(guī)劃;2008年08期
5 趙群毅;周一星;;西方生產(chǎn)者服務(wù)業(yè)空間結(jié)構(gòu)研究及其啟示[J];城市規(guī)劃學刊;2007年01期
6 梁進社,賀燦飛,張華;近10年北京經(jīng)濟職能的發(fā)展變化[J];地理學報;2005年04期
7 林彰平;閆小培;;轉(zhuǎn)型期廣州市金融服務(wù)業(yè)的空間格局變動[J];地理學報;2006年08期
8 邵暉;;北京市生產(chǎn)者服務(wù)業(yè)聚集特征[J];地理學報;2008年12期
9 邱靈;申玉銘;任旺兵;;北京生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)的關(guān)聯(lián)及空間分布[J];地理學報;2008年12期
10 申玉銘;邱靈;尚于力;任旺兵;;京滬生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)比較研究[J];地理研究;2009年02期
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條
1 劉曙華;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的區(qū)位模式及其動力機制研究[D];華東師范大學;2007年
,本文編號:1694494
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/fwjj/1694494.html