發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-14 04:29

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè) 產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚 變動(dòng)趨勢(shì) 影響因素　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展中，資本、技術(shù)密集型特點(diǎn)愈加顯著，服務(wù)業(yè)已經(jīng)開(kāi)始取代工業(yè)在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展逐漸占據(jù)主導(dǎo)地位，服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展水平已成為衡量城市乃至于整個(gè)國(guó)家現(xiàn)代化、信息化和國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的重要標(biāo)志。一方面，先進(jìn)制造業(yè)的升級(jí)離不開(kāi)現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)的支撐。另一方面，有效的促進(jìn)內(nèi)需，也離不開(kāi)現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)的繁榮。然而，從服務(wù)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力與集聚水平等方面看，，我國(guó)現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)仍存在許多問(wèn)題，如集聚程度較低、服務(wù)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)松散等，在中國(guó)進(jìn)一步開(kāi)放的格局下，服務(wù)業(yè)的核心環(huán)節(jié)—效率低下，服務(wù)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力不足已成為不爭(zhēng)的事實(shí)。 在上述背景下，本文對(duì)現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)集聚的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)和理論進(jìn)行了梳理，并對(duì)現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)集聚的實(shí)證研究、與制造業(yè)之間的比較和影響服務(wù)業(yè)集聚的因素等方面進(jìn)行了總結(jié)，從而找到當(dāng)前對(duì)現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)集聚研究的薄弱之處：指標(biāo)構(gòu)建、數(shù)據(jù)缺乏及長(zhǎng)期跟蹤。通過(guò)計(jì)算2001-2009年中國(guó)現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)的空間基尼系數(shù)，及2006-2009年中國(guó)現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)的赫芬達(dá)爾系數(shù)和EG指數(shù)，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)，我國(guó)現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)的集聚水平總體而言正在提高，同時(shí)，生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)、消費(fèi)性服務(wù)業(yè)和社會(huì)性服務(wù)業(yè)的集聚趨勢(shì)、集聚的空間結(jié)構(gòu)各不相同，生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的集聚既呈現(xiàn)空間集中，部分出現(xiàn)了行業(yè)集中，表明生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)開(kāi)始更好的服務(wù)制造業(yè)。而消費(fèi)性服務(wù)業(yè)和社會(huì)性服務(wù)業(yè)除部分集聚外，大部分較均勻，這也符合消費(fèi)和社會(huì)服務(wù)的接近終端消費(fèi)者和需求分布平均的特性。最后總結(jié)了影響集聚的因素。針對(duì)測(cè)算得到當(dāng)前現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)集聚水平及集聚結(jié)構(gòu)，我們提出了如下建議：第一，鑒于我國(guó)的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚水平依然較低，甚至低于部分社會(huì)性服務(wù)業(yè)，政府都應(yīng)該著力推動(dòng)優(yōu)化生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的空間布局，從而促進(jìn)推動(dòng)制造業(yè)的產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)。第二，要促進(jìn)內(nèi)需，更應(yīng)該促進(jìn)消費(fèi)性服務(wù)業(yè)的均勻分布，從而使消費(fèi)與生產(chǎn)的之間建立更加簡(jiǎn)單、快速的鏈接，使制造業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈充分對(duì)接終端的消費(fèi)者需求。第三，對(duì)部分集聚程度過(guò)高的社會(huì)性服務(wù)業(yè)，應(yīng)當(dāng)予以重視并進(jìn)行政策性調(diào)控。
[Abstract]:With the development of service industry, the characteristics of capital and technology intensive become more and more prominent. Service industry has begun to replace industry and gradually occupied the leading position in economic development. The level of service industry development has become a measure of the modernization of cities and even the whole country. On the one hand, the upgrading of advanced manufacturing industry can not be separated from the support of modern service industry. On the other hand, the effective promotion of domestic demand is also inseparable from the prosperity of modern service industry. From the aspect of competitiveness and agglomeration level of service industry, there are still many problems in modern service industry of our country, such as low agglomeration degree, loose structure of service industry and so on. Under the situation of further opening up in China, the core link of service industry is low efficiency. It has become an indisputable fact that the competitiveness of the service industry is insufficient. Under the above background, this paper combs the relevant literature and theory of the modern service industry agglomeration, and summarizes the empirical research on the modern service industry agglomeration, the comparison between the modern service industry and the manufacturing industry, and the factors affecting the service industry agglomeration. In order to find out the weakness of the current research on modern service industry agglomeration: index construction, lack of data and long-term tracking. By calculating the spatial Gini coefficient of China's modern service industry from 2001 to 2009, From 2006 to 2009, the Herfindahl coefficient and EG index of China's modern service industry, we find that the agglomeration level of modern service industry in China is increasing in general, and at the same time, the concentration trend of producer service industry, consumer service industry and social service industry. The spatial structure of agglomeration is different. The concentration of producer service industry is not only spatial concentration, but also industrial concentration. The results show that producer services begin to produce better service manufacturing, while consumer services and social services tend to be more uniform, except for some of them. This also accords with the characteristics of consumption and social services, which are close to the average distribution of end consumers and demand. Finally, the factors affecting agglomeration are summarized. We put forward the following suggestions: first, in view of the fact that the concentration level of producer services in China is still low, or even lower than some social services, the government should strive to optimize the spatial distribution of producer services. In order to promote the upgrading of the industrial structure of the manufacturing industry. Second, in order to promote domestic demand, we should also promote the even distribution of consumer services, so as to establish a simpler and faster link between consumption and production. Third, we should pay more attention to some social service industries which have too high agglomeration degree and carry out policy regulation and control.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F719

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 程大中;論服務(wù)業(yè)在國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)中的“黏合劑”作用[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年02期

2 程大中,黃雯;中國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)的區(qū)位分布與地區(qū)專業(yè)化[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年07期

3 裴長(zhǎng)洪;謝謙;;集聚、組織創(chuàng)新與外包模式——我國(guó)現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展的理論視角[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年07期

4 胡霞;魏作磊;;中國(guó)城市服務(wù)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年08期

5 管馳明;高雅娜;;我國(guó)城市服務(wù)業(yè)集聚程度及其區(qū)域差異研究[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2011年02期

6 張三峰;;我國(guó)生產(chǎn)者服務(wù)業(yè)城市集聚度測(cè)算及其特征研究——基于21個(gè)城市的分析[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年03期

7 韓峰;王琢卓;李玉雙;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚與城市經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)——基于湖南省地級(jí)城市面板數(shù)據(jù)分析[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年06期

8 金榮學(xué);許廣月;;現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展研究——基于中國(guó)省級(jí)面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)政研究;2009年11期

9 王曉玉;;國(guó)外生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚研究述評(píng)[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2006年03期

10 張樹(shù)林;;現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)集聚效應(yīng)分析[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2006年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳國(guó)亮;新經(jīng)濟(jì)地理學(xué)視角下的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：1509874