【摘要】：“時權(quán)式酒店”是一種旅游業(yè)、房地產(chǎn)業(yè)與酒店業(yè)相結(jié)合的新型財產(chǎn)，，它的特點是把產(chǎn)權(quán)按照時段分割成若干部分，并引入分時享有與交換使用這兩大機制，從而實現(xiàn)物的利用效益的最大化。因其具備投資與居住的雙重功能,“時權(quán)式酒店”在國外得到繁榮的發(fā)展。然而，由于對“時權(quán)式酒店”產(chǎn)權(quán)的法律性質(zhì)存在爭議，其在我國現(xiàn)行的房地產(chǎn)法以及物權(quán)法體系中難以持續(xù)發(fā)展，經(jīng)濟效益未能有效發(fā)揮。因此，有必要為“時權(quán)式酒店”選擇合適的權(quán)利模式，并進一步完善相關(guān)的制度，為“時權(quán)式酒店”在我國的進一步發(fā)展保駕護航。 本文分為四部分，第一部分介紹“時權(quán)式酒店”在國外以及我國的發(fā)展狀況。其中指出其在我國發(fā)展中存在的不足，并進一步分析不足的原因.第二部分析各國對“時權(quán)式酒店”采取的權(quán)利模式以及兩種模式后的財產(chǎn)法構(gòu)造。第三部分是探討我國的“時權(quán)式酒店”產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)利性質(zhì)。第四部分在前述分析的基礎(chǔ)上，進一步探討時間區(qū)分所有權(quán)的相關(guān)配套制度的完善。
[Abstract]:"time right hotel" is a new type of property which combines tourism, real estate industry and hotel industry. it is characterized by the division of property rights into several parts according to the time period, and the introduction of the two mechanisms of time-sharing enjoyment and exchange use. In order to realize the maximization of the utilization benefit of things. Because of its dual functions of investment and residence, "time right hotel" has been prosperous in foreign countries. However, due to the dispute over the legal nature of the property right of "time right hotel", it is difficult to develop sustainably in the current real estate law and property law system of our country, and the economic benefit has not been brought into full play. Therefore, it is necessary to choose the appropriate right mode for the "time right hotel", and further improve the relevant system, so as to protect the further development of the "time right hotel" in our country. This paper is divided into four parts, the first part introduces the development of "time right Hotel" in foreign countries and our country. It points out the shortcomings in the development of our country, and further analyzes the reasons for the shortcomings. The second part analyzes the right model of "time right hotel" and the structure of property law after the two models. The third part is to explore the nature of the property rights of "time hotel" in our country. The fourth part, on the basis of the above analysis, further discusses the improvement of the relevant supporting system of time distinction ownership.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 陳耀東,任容慶;初探所有權(quán)型分時度假的基本法律問題——兼論對傳統(tǒng)不動產(chǎn)所有權(quán)理論的發(fā)展[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年04期

2 汪傳才;論英國的分時度假立法[J];河北法學(xué);2005年07期

3 段耀峰;;論建立分時度假法律制度的必要性[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年06期

4 李潔;;從國外分時度假發(fā)展經(jīng)驗看我國的分時度假產(chǎn)品市場[J];江蘇商論;2010年11期

5 冉昊;"相對"的所有權(quán)——雙重所有權(quán)的英美法系視角與大陸法系絕對所有權(quán)的解構(gòu)[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2004年04期

6 黃健雄;;分時度假法律模式之研究[J];中國法學(xué);2006年06期

本文編號：2486131