【摘要】：本文以小產權房為研究對象，以我國特有的土地用途管制制度和社會現(xiàn)實為基礎，分析了與小產權房相關的各利益群體之間的利益沖突，試圖尋找到小產權房及其利益沖突產生的法律和社會原因，從而提出解決的途徑和辦法。 本文包括引言、正文和結語共六個部分。第一部分引言中，筆者通過分析我國小產權房出現(xiàn)的歷史背景，以及目前法學界對小產權房問題的爭議討論，來引出下文的基本內容。第二部分小產權房概述，介紹了小產權房的相關定義和學界對其的界定，并以北京市具體的小產權房案件為例，通過對小產權房現(xiàn)狀的分析，提出筆者的觀點，即“堵”不如“疏”，應該對其進行合理的引導和規(guī)制。第三部分為小產權房產生的原因。首先從法律制度的角度對小產權房定位，利用《憲法》、《土地管理法》等相關法律規(guī)定對小產權房的解釋進行對比來揭示現(xiàn)行規(guī)定的不合理性，然后分別從我國的社會結構、經濟發(fā)展等方面入手，對我國特有的土地制度進行分析，指出不合理的土地制度才是我國小產權房產生的深層次原因。第四部分是小產權房問題所引發(fā)的利益沖突。主要從法經濟學的角度，分別分析了城市與農村之間的利益沖突、政府與農民之間的利益沖突、農村集體與農民個體之間的利益沖突、農村集體與購房者之間的利益沖突、房地產開發(fā)商與農村集體之間的利益沖突以及房地產開發(fā)商與普通公眾之間的利益沖突之后，得出將小產權房界定為非法是法律在利益分配中的一種失衡的表現(xiàn)。房地產開發(fā)商和地方政府是其中的既得利益者，而普通城市民眾和農民則是利益被犧牲的一方。從而進一步提出法律制度的設計應當符合資源分配的利益均衡性原則，應對當前不合理的法律制度進行修正，使其能夠更合理的分配社會資源。第五部分是小產權房相關利益沖突的解決途徑。筆者在前面幾章的基礎上，通過小產權房合法化的必要性與可行性分析、明晰集體土地所有權主體、合理化土地用途管理、加強土地交易的管理與引導等方面來提出建議，試圖解決目前存在的各方利益沖突。最后一部分結語里，作者提出文章的最終觀點，即小產權房是中國特有的土地制度、經濟形勢、不完善的法律制度、多方利益不平衡博弈等多方面原因綜合的產物。禁止小產權房交易，不僅違反憲法中國有土地與集體土地所有權平等的規(guī)定，也不符合市場經濟交易自由的原則，更不利于我國社會經濟的健康發(fā)展和資源公平分配，所以應該多方共同作用，，賦予小產權合法的地位。
[Abstract]:Based on the special land-use control system and social reality, this paper analyzes the conflicts of interest among various interest groups related to small-property-right housing, taking the small-property house as the research object, and on the basis of the special land-use control system and social reality in our country. This paper tries to find out the legal and social reasons of the small property right house and the conflict of interest, so as to put forward the ways and methods to solve it. This article includes the introduction, the text and the conclusion altogether six parts. In the first part of the introduction, the author analyzes the historical background of the emergence of the small property right house in China and the dispute discussion on the small property right house in the legal circle at present, so as to draw out the basic content of the following. The second part summarizes the small property right house, introduces the related definition of the small property right house and the definition of it by the academic circles, and takes the concrete small property right house case in Beijing as an example, through the analysis of the present situation of the small property right house, puts forward the author's point of view. That is, "clogging" is not as good as "sparse", it should be reasonably guided and regulated. The third part is the reason of the small property right house. First of all, from the point of view of the legal system, the author compares the interpretation of the small property right houses with the relevant legal provisions, such as the Constitution and the Land Administration Law, to reveal the irrationality of the current regulations, and then separately from the social structure of our country. From the aspects of economic development, this paper analyzes the special land system of our country, and points out that the unreasonable land system is the deep-seated cause of the small property right house in our country. The fourth part is the conflict of interest caused by the problem of small property right house. From the angle of law and economics, this paper analyzes the conflict of interest between the city and the countryside, between the government and the farmer, between the rural collective and the individual farmer, and between the rural collective and the buyers of the house. After the conflict of interest between the real estate developer and the rural collective and between the real estate developer and the general public, it is concluded that the illegal definition of the small property right house is an unbalanced performance of the law in the distribution of interests. Real estate developers and local governments are vested interests, while ordinary urban citizens and farmers are the ones whose interests have been sacrificed. Therefore, the design of the legal system should conform to the principle of balance of interests in the distribution of resources, and the current unreasonable legal system should be amended so as to make it more reasonable to allocate social resources. The fifth part is the way to solve the conflict of interest related to the small property right house. On the basis of the previous chapters, the author puts forward some suggestions by analyzing the necessity and feasibility of legalization of small property right houses, clarifying the subject of collective land ownership, rationalizing land use management, strengthening the management and guidance of land transaction, and so on. Trying to resolve the current conflict of interest between the parties. In the last part of the conclusion, the author puts forward the final point of the article, that is, the small property right house is the product of the special land system, the economic situation, the imperfect legal system, the multi-party interest imbalance game and so on in China's unique land system, the economic situation, the imperfect legal system and so on. The prohibition of small property right housing transactions not only violates the constitutional provisions on the equality of ownership of land and collective land in China, but also does not conform to the principle of free trade in the market economy, and is not conducive to the healthy development of China's social economy and the fair distribution of resources. Therefore, we should work together to give the legal status of small property rights.
【學位授予單位】：河南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.29

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 周安遠;;小產權房問題思考[J];上海房地;2008年12期

本文編號：2436135