【摘要】：城中村是我國城市化發(fā)展進程中的一種特殊現(xiàn)象，，它不僅擠占了城市的發(fā)展空間，更嚴重影響了城市的景觀環(huán)境和社會治安，改造城中村是大勢所趨。各城中村問題比較突出的城市相繼掀起了城中村改造活動。在城中村改造中，村民最為關心的方面就是改造中城中村集體資產的分配。城中村集體資產股份化改制中的股權分配，是城中村改造的核心和關鍵。對城中村改造的最終完成，以及改造后城中村的穩(wěn)定和諧都具有重要意義。 要對城中村集體資產進行股份化改制并分配。首先，必須明確可納入股份化改制范圍的集體資產。按照經(jīng)營性資產和資源型資產的不同特性，理清兩種集體資產的來源和組成情況。明確經(jīng)營性資產可以進入股份化改制的范圍，并重點對城中村集體企業(yè)資產以及集體土地上開發(fā)的房地產兩種情況進行分析。在城中村集體土地是否能納入股份化改制范圍問題上，從理論和現(xiàn)實兩方面進行分析。認為將城中村集體土地納入股份化改制范圍，不僅是集體土地極端重要性的要求，更是現(xiàn)實的需要，而且符合當前進行的農村集體建設用地使用權流轉實驗的精神。 通過分析全國城中村改造中將股份化改制了的集體資產分為集體股和個人股的一般做法，得出當前集體資產股份化改制中股權設置的缺陷。即：對于兩種股權設置具體包含哪些集體資產的標準模糊且分歧較大。根據(jù)個人股可以量化到個人，由個人享有其收益。集體股不以分配給個人為重點，其收益主要用于集體發(fā)展的一般性原則。結合不同集體資產的特性，明確了各種集體資產具體屬于哪種股權設置類型。以便集體資產得到公平、合理得分配。 城中村人口構成情況復雜，這給股權分配工作帶來了一定的難度。因此，必須明確不同人群的特殊性，對于不同人群的分配范圍和分配標準予以細化。這樣才能保證集體資產分配的公平合理。將城中村人口分為一般的城中村集體經(jīng)濟組織成員與特殊人群，并進一步對特殊人群進行分類。對于不同的人群，給予其不同的分配資格和分配標準。最終完成集體資產股份化改制中的股權分配工作。
[Abstract]:The village in city is a special phenomenon in the process of urbanization development in our country. It not only occupies the development space of the city, but also seriously affects the landscape environment and social security of the city, and it is the trend of the times to reform the village in the city. Each city village problem more prominent cities have set off urban village transformation activities. In the transformation of villages in cities, villagers are most concerned about the distribution of collective assets. The distribution of equity in the demutualization of village collective assets is the core and key of village reform. It is of great significance to the final completion of the village transformation and the stability and harmony of the village in the city after the transformation. To the village collective assets in the city to be demutualized and distributed. First, the collective assets that can be brought into the scope of demutualization must be clearly defined. According to the different characteristics of operating assets and resource-based assets, the origin and composition of the two collective assets are clarified. It is clear that operating assets can enter the scope of joint-stock reform, and the two situations of collective enterprise assets and real estate development on collective land are analyzed. Whether the village collective land in the city can be incorporated into the scope of demutualization reform is analyzed theoretically and practically. It is considered that it is not only the requirement of the extreme importance of collective land, but also the practical need to bring the village collective land into the scope of joint-stock reform. It also accords with the spirit of the current experiment on the circulation of the right to use the rural collective construction land. Based on the analysis of the general practice of dividing the collective assets into collective shares and individual shares in the transformation of villages in cities in China, the defects of stock right setting in the reform of collective assets are obtained. That is to say, the standard of which collective assets are vague and divergent for the two kinds of equity. According to the individual shares can be quantified to the individual, by the individual to enjoy its benefits. Collective shares do not focus on distribution to individuals; their proceeds are mainly used for general principles of collective development. Combined with the characteristics of different collective assets, it is clear which kind of equity establishment each kind of collective assets belong to. So that collective assets are fairly and reasonably distributed. Urban village population composition is complex, which brings a certain degree of difficulty to equity distribution. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the particularity of different populations and to refine the distribution scope and criteria of different groups. Only in this way can the distribution of collective assets be fair and reasonable. The urban village population is divided into general urban village collective economic organization members and special people, and the special population is further classified. For different groups of people, give them different allocation qualifications and criteria. The final completion of collective assets in the shareholding reform of the distribution of shares.
【學位授予單位】：湖南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.32

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 余夢秋;陳家澤;;固化農村集體經(jīng)濟組織成員權的理論思考[J];財經(jīng)科學;2011年11期

2 吳曉;城市中的“農村社區(qū)”——流動人口聚居區(qū)的現(xiàn)狀與整合研究[J];城市規(guī)劃;2001年12期

3 閆小培,魏立華,周銳波;快速城市化地區(qū)城鄉(xiāng)關系協(xié)調研究——以廣州市“城中村”改造為例[J];城市規(guī)劃;2004年03期

4 魏立華,閆小培;“城中村”:存續(xù)前提下的轉型——兼論“城中村”改造的可行性模式[J];城市規(guī)劃;2005年07期

5 吳興國;;集體組織成員資格及成員權研究[J];法學雜志;2006年02期

6 李立勛;城中村的經(jīng)濟社會特征——以廣州市典型城中村為例[J];北京規(guī)劃建設;2005年03期

7 曾建民;發(fā)達國家農村城市化發(fā)展措施及效應[J];經(jīng)濟縱橫;2003年08期

8 張京祥;趙偉;;二元規(guī)制環(huán)境中城中村發(fā)展及其意義的分析[J];江蘇城市規(guī)劃;2006年08期

9 李津逵;城中村的真問題[J];開放導報;2005年03期

10 劉偉文;“城中村”的城市化特征及其問題分析——以廣州為例[J];南方人口;2003年03期

本文編號：2426158