發(fā)布時間：2018-07-08 13:59

  本文選題：房屋登記錯誤 + 法律救濟　； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：不動產(chǎn)包括土地以及房屋、林木等地上的定著物1。《物權(quán)法》第9條規(guī)定：“不動產(chǎn)物權(quán)的設(shè)立、變更、轉(zhuǎn)讓及消滅，經(jīng)依法登記，發(fā)生效力；未經(jīng)登記，，不發(fā)生效力，但法律另有規(guī)定的除外。依法屬于國家所有的自然資源，所有權(quán)可以不登記。”房屋是與公民生活息息相關(guān)，且最重要的不動產(chǎn)。規(guī)范房屋登記行為，對于維護(hù)房屋交易安全和房地產(chǎn)市場交易秩序，保障行政相對人合法權(quán)益具有重要作用。但因理性的有限性，由房屋登記機構(gòu)工作人員主導(dǎo)的房屋登記行為難免發(fā)生錯誤，又因房產(chǎn)交易價格高、價值大，若出現(xiàn)登記錯誤，可能造成相對人權(quán)益的極大損害。因此，從理論上探討房屋登記錯誤行為的內(nèi)涵，切實提供房屋登記錯誤救濟渠道具有十分重要的現(xiàn)實意義。 本文除引言和結(jié)語外，全文共分四部分： 第一部分是房屋登記錯誤法律救濟的基本理論。從房屋登記錯誤行為性質(zhì)出發(fā)，界定房屋登記錯誤行為的內(nèi)涵，重點運用法律救濟理論，厘清房屋登記錯誤法律救濟的主要類型，包括行政救濟與司法救濟。 第二部分是房屋登記錯誤法律救濟的海外立法例評析。通過考察德國、瑞士、日本和我國臺灣地區(qū)房屋登記錯誤行政與司法救濟立法內(nèi)容，分析其合理性，為完善房屋登記法律救濟提供可供借鑒的經(jīng)驗。 第三部分是我國房屋登記錯誤法律救濟的現(xiàn)狀及問題。通過分析我國房屋登記錯誤法律救濟的立法和現(xiàn)實適用，得出我國房屋登記錯誤法律救濟在立法和實踐中存在的主要問題，包括立法上異議登記與更正登記規(guī)定不科學(xué)、司法救濟和賠償機制不完善；實踐中相對人忽略行政救濟，徑直選擇司法救濟，增加了救濟成本，司法救濟還存在行政與民事訴訟沖突。 第四部分是我國房屋登記錯誤法律救濟的完善。建議我國房屋登記錯誤法律救濟以“窮盡行政救濟”原則為基礎(chǔ)，將行政救濟作為司法救濟的前置程序，突出行政救濟專業(yè)性、成本低等優(yōu)點，使房屋登記錯誤在進(jìn)入司法救濟時明確適用行政附帶民事訴訟模式，并建立國家負(fù)擔(dān)與房屋登記機構(gòu)工作人員職業(yè)責(zé)任保險相結(jié)合的賠償機制，確保行政相對人權(quán)益得到救濟。
[Abstract]:Real estate includes land, houses, trees, and other fixed objects on the ground. Article 9 of the property Law stipulates: "the establishment, alteration, transfer and elimination of real property rights shall be registered according to law and shall become effective; if they are not registered, they shall not be effective." Except as otherwise provided by law. Ownership of natural resources that are legally owned by the State may not be registered. " Housing is closely related to the life of citizens, and the most important real estate. Standardizing the behavior of housing registration plays an important role in safeguarding the security of housing transactions and the order of real estate market transactions and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of administrative counterparts. However, due to the limitation of rationality, it is inevitable to make mistakes in the housing registration behavior led by the staff of the housing registration organization, and because of the high price and high value of the real estate transaction, if there is a registration error, it may cause great damage to the rights and interests of the relative party. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to probe into the connotation of housing registration errors and to provide a remedy channel for housing registration errors. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts: the first part is the basic theory of legal remedy for housing registration errors. Starting from the nature of house registration error behavior, this paper defines the connotation of housing registration error behavior, and focuses on the application of legal relief theory to clarify the main types of housing registration error legal relief, including administrative relief and judicial relief. The second part is the analysis of overseas legislation on the legal remedy of housing registration errors. Through investigating the legislation content of wrong administration and judicial remedy of housing registration in Germany, Switzerland, Japan and Taiwan, the rationality of the legislation is analyzed, which can be used for reference in perfecting the legal relief of housing registration. The third part is the current situation and problems of legal remedy for housing registration errors in China. Based on the analysis of the legislation and practical application of the legal remedy for housing registration errors in China, the main problems in the legislation and practice of the legal remedy for housing registration errors in our country are obtained, including the unscientific provisions of dissenting registration and correction of registration provisions in legislation. The mechanism of judicial relief and compensation is not perfect; in practice, the relative person neglects the administrative relief and chooses the judicial remedy directly, which increases the cost of relief, and there are conflicts between administration and civil litigation. The fourth part is the perfection of legal remedy for housing registration errors. It is suggested that the legal remedy for house registration errors in our country should be based on the principle of "exhausted administrative relief", take administrative relief as the leading procedure of judicial relief, emphasize the professional nature of administrative relief, and have the advantages of low cost, etc. In order to ensure the rights and interests of administrative counterpart get relief, the model of administrative incidental civil action should be applied clearly when house registration error entered into judicial relief, and the compensation mechanism of combining the national burden with the occupational liability insurance of the staff of the housing registration institution should be established.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 王榮珍;;論預(yù)告登記的善意取得[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年03期

2 王崇敏;;我國不動產(chǎn)登記機關(guān)賠償責(zé)任問題探討[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年05期

3 譚兵,王志勝;論法官現(xiàn)代化:專業(yè)化、職業(yè)化和同質(zhì)化——兼談中國法官隊伍的現(xiàn)代化問題[J];中國法學(xué);2001年03期

本文編號：2107665