本文選題：房地產(chǎn)市場 + 政策失靈��； 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：房地產(chǎn)調(diào)控政策出現(xiàn)在我們身邊已經(jīng)不再是新鮮的事情,然而,對于房地產(chǎn)調(diào)控政策的探討甚至爭論卻始終存在。從房地產(chǎn)調(diào)控政策出臺至今的十幾年里,我們看到的就是且調(diào)且漲的奇怪現(xiàn)象。為什么會出現(xiàn)這樣的效果?房地產(chǎn)調(diào)控政策的問題究竟在哪兒?如果其科學(xué)性、有效性都被質(zhì)疑,既不可避免地帶來極大的消極影響,又對房地產(chǎn)市場中的實質(zhì)問題避而不談,那么它還有沒有繼續(xù)存在的必要?是否有可以取代政策的、可以更好地發(fā)揮作用的手段存在?筆者認(rèn)為,這些問題都值得我們認(rèn)真思考。 本文的前言部分主要介紹了本文研究房地產(chǎn)調(diào)控政策存廢問題的起因、研究現(xiàn)狀、研究意義等情況。通過文獻(xiàn)檢索與整理,筆者認(rèn)為目前學(xué)者對于房地產(chǎn)調(diào)控政策的側(cè)重點多集中在政策本身,或褒或貶,主要是圍繞著政策的內(nèi)容、形式、效果等展開；或者不同學(xué)科從自己的視角對某一類政策做出評價；經(jīng)濟法學(xué)者多強調(diào)房地產(chǎn)調(diào)控政策與經(jīng)濟法、尤其是宏觀調(diào)控法的關(guān)系,引申到對宏觀調(diào)控的權(quán)限、主體、原則、手段等問題的思考。筆者嘗試從政策入手,但是試圖否定政策,得出房地產(chǎn)市場的健康發(fā)展需要經(jīng)濟法各制度的建立與完善來取代現(xiàn)有政策的結(jié)論。 本文的第一章介紹了關(guān)于房地產(chǎn)調(diào)控政策出臺的市場背景以及其與現(xiàn)行法律的關(guān)系。房地產(chǎn)調(diào)控政策出臺的市場背景,即我國房地產(chǎn)市場存在了哪些問題才導(dǎo)致政策頻頻出臺；房地產(chǎn)調(diào)控政策出臺之后與現(xiàn)存法律部門的關(guān)系,則指出了其與民商法、行政法等難以自洽的部分,也探討了它與經(jīng)濟法、尤其是與宏觀調(diào)控法的關(guān)系。本文的第二章,筆者詳盡論述了目前房地產(chǎn)調(diào)控政策的失靈。房地產(chǎn)市場調(diào)控十幾年,究竟其調(diào)控目標(biāo)是什么?各類政策在理論上想起到怎樣的作用?實際中效果究竟如何?那么,這一部分內(nèi)容就分類討論了各政策在實際執(zhí)行過程中淪為“空調(diào)”的現(xiàn)象。 當(dāng)然,政策頻頻淪為“空調(diào)”,主要原因在于市場方面與政府方面的頑疾政策根本無法涉及。本文的第三章認(rèn)真討論了這一問題。房地產(chǎn)市場中的“市場失靈”與“政府失靈”交替出現(xiàn)：嚴(yán)重的供求失衡問題、目前的土地出讓制度問題政策無法解決,房地產(chǎn)商的壟斷行為、不正當(dāng)競爭行為政策“視而不見”；央行超發(fā)貨幣行為的隨意性政策毫無辦法,而公共資源分配不公的問題又不是政策力所能及。 因此,在本文的第四章提出這樣的觀點：為了扭轉(zhuǎn)政策頻頻失靈的現(xiàn)狀,不進(jìn)入市場失靈與政府失靈交替循環(huán)的死胡同,我們應(yīng)該盡快用制度來取替政策的存在。經(jīng)濟法視角下,可以充分發(fā)揮并完善反壟斷法律制度、反不正當(dāng)法律制度、中央銀行法律制度、土地管理法律制度、財稅法律制度、以及保障住房法律制度的積極作用。畢竟,已有的法律資源具有政策所不能比擬的穩(wěn)定性、科學(xué)性和效力性,規(guī)制和調(diào)控市場的同時約束政府的權(quán)力,使房地產(chǎn)市場盡快走出且調(diào)且漲的怪圈。
[Abstract]:The real estate regulation policy appears to be no longer fresh in our side . However , the discussion of the real estate regulation policy has always existed . From the last ten years of the real estate regulation policy , we have seen the strange phenomenon of the adjustment and expansion . Where is the question of the real estate regulation policy ? If its scientific nature and validity are questioned , there is no need to continue to exist ?

The preface of this paper mainly introduces the causes , research situation , research significance and so on of the problem of real estate regulation and control policy . Through the literature search and arrangement , the author thinks that the focus on the policy of real estate regulation is focused on the policy itself , or the praise or decline , mainly around the content , form and effect of the policy .
or different disciplines to evaluate a certain kind of policies from their own perspective ;
The scholars of economic law emphasize the relationship between real estate regulation policy and economic law , especially macro - control law , and draw on the thinking about the right , subject , principle and means of macro - control .

The first chapter introduces the market background of the real estate regulation policy and its relationship with the current law . The market background of the real estate regulation policy is that China ' s real estate market has some problems which lead to the introduction of the policy frequency .
The relationship between the real estate regulation policy and the existing legal department is pointed out , and its relationship with civil and commercial law , administrative law and so on is pointed out , and its relationship with economic law , especially macro - control law is discussed . In chapter 2 , the author discusses the failure of the current real estate market regulation policy .

Of course , the policy frequency is reduced to " air conditioner " , the main reason is that the market and the government ' s persistent policy can not be involved . The third chapter of this paper discusses the problem seriously . The " market failure " and " government failure " in the real estate market appear alternately : the serious supply and demand imbalance problem , the current policy of the land exit system cannot be solved , the property dealer ' s monopoly behavior , the unfair competition behavior policy " ignore " ;
The central bank ' s discretionary policy on monetary behavior has no means , and the problem of public resource allocation is not the policy force .

Therefore , in the fourth chapter of this paper , it is put forward that in order to reverse the current situation of the frequency of the policy , we should use the system as soon as possible to get the existence of the policy . In the view of the economic law , we can give full play to and perfect the anti - monopoly law system , the anti - unfair legal system , the central bank ' s legal system , the legal system of land management , the legal system of the taxation and taxation , and the active role of guaranteeing the legal system of the housing . After all , the existing legal resources have the stability , the scientific nature and the validity of the policy , regulate and regulate the market , restrain the power of the government , and make the real estate market move out of and rise as soon as possible .
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.291

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 單飛躍;魯勇睿;;貨幣政策權(quán)力的憲法性配置研究[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年03期

2 汪浩,王小龍;公共產(chǎn)品供給與房地產(chǎn)市場調(diào)控:理論分析與政策建議[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2005年11期

3 況偉大;空間競爭、房價收入比與房價[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2004年07期

4 高波;;房地產(chǎn)開發(fā)商策略性定價行為的經(jīng)濟學(xué)分析[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟研究;2008年02期

5 鄭敬高;田野;;從“國家意志”到“行政法治”——在法律與政策關(guān)系上的泛法律觀[J];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年05期

6 鄭少華;吳曉暉;;論宏觀調(diào)控法的理論前提及方法[J];東方法學(xué);2008年02期

7 張守文;經(jīng)濟法的政策分析初探[J];法商研究;2003年05期

8 陳承堂;;宏觀調(diào)控的合法性研究——以房地產(chǎn)市場宏觀調(diào)控為視角[J];法商研究;2006年05期

9 李龍,汪習(xí)根;二十世紀(jì)中國法理學(xué)回眸[J];法學(xué)評論;1999年04期

10 鄭少華;;“限購令”的法律解釋[J];法學(xué);2011年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 龔斌恩;我國貨幣政策的房地產(chǎn)價格傳導(dǎo)效應(yīng)研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：2106702