本文選題：城鎮(zhèn)住房保障水平 + 保障性住房��； 參考：《上海師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國的保障性住房制度是伴隨著住房制度改革的推進、完善而逐步產(chǎn)生與發(fā)展的。1994年,《國務(wù)院關(guān)于深化城鎮(zhèn)住房制度改革的決定》提出要建立以中低收入家庭為對象、具有社會保障性質(zhì)的經(jīng)濟適用住房供應(yīng)體系。1998年,隨著住房貨幣化分配制度的實施,我國進入住房保障制度體系建設(shè)階段。此后,我國開始全面實施經(jīng)濟適用房、公積金和廉租房制度,2008年,《國務(wù)院辦公廳關(guān)于促進房地產(chǎn)市場健康發(fā)展的若干意見》提出要通過加大廉租住房建設(shè)力度和實施城市棚戶區(qū)改造等方式,解決城市低收入住房困難家庭的住房問題,增加經(jīng)濟適用住房供給,我國開始進入了保障性住房大補課階段。2011年3月,第十一屆全國人大第四次會議通過的“十二五”規(guī)劃,正式明確“對城鎮(zhèn)低收入住房困難家庭,實行廉租住房制度。對中低等偏下收入住房困難家庭,實行公共租賃住房保障”。 我國城鎮(zhèn)住房保障不管是在總體規(guī)模、還是在人均水平上都取得了顯著地提升,也切實解決了一大批中低收入家庭的住房困難問題。但是,由于我國起步晚、底子薄等原因,在建設(shè)過程中已經(jīng)暴露出許多問題：第一,建設(shè)資金籌措和土地供應(yīng)壓力大；第二,保障性住房規(guī)劃設(shè)計有待改善,基礎(chǔ)配套設(shè)施相對落后；第三,許多地方制定了不符合當(dāng)?shù)貙嶋H情況的住房保障標(biāo)準(zhǔn)或收入線標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 我們認為上述問題之所以出現(xiàn),關(guān)鍵在于當(dāng)前很多城鎮(zhèn)對住房保障目標(biāo)和定位的認識不全面,對于城鎮(zhèn)住房保障水平差異性的影響因素及其在不同地區(qū)表現(xiàn)出的差異性認識尚不明確。為此,本文首先對我國的住房保障差異性現(xiàn)狀進行了描述,并結(jié)合統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù)對這種差異性的影響因素進行了描述,然后用主成分分析法和多元回歸線性分析方法對這種差異性進行了評述和評價,最后對國外的住房保障政策經(jīng)驗進行了借鑒分析。此外,本文結(jié)合研究結(jié)論提出了有針對性的政策建議,以期為我國城鎮(zhèn)住房保障的發(fā)展和完善提供有價值的借鑒作用。
[Abstract]:In 1994, the decision of the State Council on deepening the reform of urban housing system proposed the establishment of low and middle income families. In 1998, with the implementation of the housing monetization distribution system, China entered the stage of housing security system construction. Since then, China has begun to fully implement comfortable housing, In 2008, the General Office of the State Council on promoting the healthy development of the real estate market suggested that efforts should be made to strengthen the construction of low-rent housing and to carry out the transformation of urban shantytowns. In order to solve the housing problem of low-income housing families in urban areas and increase the supply of affordable housing, China has begun to enter the stage of supplementary classes for affordable housing. In March 2011, the 12th Five-Year Plan adopted by the fourth session of the Eleventh National people's Congress, Formal clarification of "low-income housing for urban families, the implementation of low-rent housing system." For families with low and middle income housing difficulties, public rental housing security has been implemented. "in China, housing security in cities and towns has improved significantly both in terms of overall scale and per capita level," he said. It has also effectively solved the housing difficulties of a large number of low-and middle-income families. However, due to the late start and weak foundation of our country, many problems have been exposed in the construction process: first, the construction financing and land supply pressure is great; second, the planning and design of affordable housing needs to be improved. The infrastructure facilities are relatively backward; third, many places have formulated housing security standards or income line standards that do not conform to the actual local conditions. We believe that these problems arise. The key lies in the fact that many cities and towns do not have a comprehensive understanding of the goal and orientation of housing security at present, and the factors affecting the difference of housing security level in cities and towns and their differences in different regions are still unclear. Therefore, this paper first describes the current situation of housing security difference in China, and combines the statistical data to describe the influencing factors of the difference. Then the difference is commented and evaluated by principal component analysis and regression analysis, and the experience of housing security policy in foreign countries is analyzed. In addition, based on the conclusions of the study, this paper puts forward some targeted policy recommendations, in order to provide valuable reference for the development and improvement of urban housing security in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F299.23

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李洪俠;城鎮(zhèn)基本住房保障體系研究[D];財政部財政科學(xué)研究所;2012年

，

本文編號：2006485