本文關(guān)鍵詞： 青少年 心理健康 SCL-90量表 菲爾人格量表　出處：《南華大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目的 通過對南陽市青少年心理健康現(xiàn)況及影響因素的調(diào)查,描述其現(xiàn)狀及特征,并結(jié)合當前社會體制轉(zhuǎn)型、社會思潮、生活方式和價值取向等情況,分析青少年問題產(chǎn)生的深層次的原因,探討青少年心理問題的相關(guān)影響因素,為有效解決青少年心理健康問題提供理論依據(jù)。 方法 本研究以南陽市作為研究現(xiàn)場,運用多階抽樣方法選擇樣本,采用問卷調(diào)查法共調(diào)查925例。調(diào)查內(nèi)容主要包括:一般情況、SCL-90和菲爾人格量表測試。對SCL-90各因子分均數(shù)和人格測試結(jié)果采用t檢驗和單因素方差分析;影響因素采用多元線性回歸分析。 結(jié)果 1.與國內(nèi)青年常模比較,本次測試的南陽市青少年各因子分除強迫因子和人際關(guān)系外,其余因子均分均高于國內(nèi)青年常模,差別有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(p0.01)。 2.男性青少年在敵對性、軀體化兩個方面的因子均分高于女性青少年(p0.05);不同學(xué)歷青少年人際關(guān)系和抑郁兩個因子均分差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(p0.05),兩兩比較:大學(xué)學(xué)歷青少年人際關(guān)系敏感因子均分低于中學(xué)和小學(xué)學(xué)歷青少年,大學(xué)學(xué)歷青少年抑郁因子均分低于小學(xué)學(xué)歷,差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(p0.05),但和中學(xué)學(xué)歷青少年比較差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(p0.05);留守青少年在強迫和人際關(guān)系兩個因子方面的均分高于非留守青少年(p0.05);農(nóng)村青少年在人際關(guān)系方面因子均分高于城市青少年,在偏執(zhí)方面,城市青少年因子均分高于農(nóng)村青少年(p0.05);年滿18周歲及以上的青少年在軀體化和恐怖兩個因子方面的均分高于18周歲以下的青少年(p0.05); 3.六種人格測試類型在單因素方差分析中,強迫因子均分有顯著差異,具有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(p0.05),其他因子均分沒有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(p0.05);兩兩比較分析中,部分因子:軀體化、強迫、抑郁、焦慮、偏執(zhí)有顯著性差異,有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(p0.05); 4.經(jīng)多元線性回歸顯示:來源地、年齡、學(xué)歷和人格測試結(jié)果四個因素是影響青少年心理健康的因素。 結(jié)論 1.南陽市青少年的心理健康總體水平比國內(nèi)正常人群要低。 2.青少年心理健康狀況:非留守青少年優(yōu)于留守青少年;大學(xué)學(xué)歷青少年優(yōu)于中、小學(xué)學(xué)歷青少年;女性青少年優(yōu)于男性青少年;年齡18周歲以下的青少年優(yōu)于年滿18周歲及以上的青少年。 3.不同人格類型的青少年的心理健康狀況有顯著性差異,主要表現(xiàn)在以下因子:軀體化、強迫、抑郁、焦慮、偏執(zhí),通過比較分析,人格分值越高的青少年,其心理健康狀況相對越差。 4.影響青少年心理健康的因素主要是來源地、年齡、學(xué)歷和人格測試結(jié)果。
[Abstract]:Purpose. By investigating the mental health status and influencing factors of adolescents in Nanyang City, the present situation and characteristics are described, and combined with the current situation of social system transformation, social trend of thought, lifestyle and value orientation, etc. This paper analyzes the deep causes of adolescent problems and probes into the related influencing factors of adolescent psychological problems to provide a theoretical basis for effectively solving adolescent mental health problems. Method. In this study, Nanyang City was used as the research site, and the method of multi-stage sampling was used to select samples. A total of 925 cases were investigated by questionnaire. The main contents of the investigation included: the general situation of SCL-90 and Phil's personality scale. T test and single factor ANOVA were used to test the average scores of SCL-90 factors and the results of personality test. The influencing factors were analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis. Results. 1.Compared with the domestic youth norm, the average scores of every factor in Nanyang were higher than that of the national youth norm except compulsive factor and interpersonal relationship, the difference was statistically significant (p 0.01). 2. Male adolescents are hostile, The average score of somatization in two aspects was higher than that in female adolescents (p 0.05), and there were significant differences in interpersonal relationship and depression between adolescents with different degrees of education (P < 0.05). The score is lower than that of adolescents with secondary and primary school qualifications, The average score of depression factor in college youth was lower than that in primary school. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), but there was no significant difference compared with the middle school education adolescents, the average scores of the two factors of obsessive force and interpersonal relationship were higher than those of the non-left-behind adolescents, and the rural adolescents were in the interpersonal relationship. The average score of factors is higher than that of urban teenagers. In the aspect of paranoid ideation, the average score of urban adolescents is higher than that of rural adolescents, the average score of somatization and phobia of adolescents aged 18 and above is higher than that of adolescents under 18 years of age. 3. In the single factor ANOVA, there were significant differences in the mean scores of obsessive factors (P 0.05), but no significant difference in other factors (P 0.05), some factors were somatization, compulsion, depression, and there were no significant differences among the six personality test types in single factor ANOVA. There was significant difference in anxiety and paranoid ideation (P 0.05). 4. The multiple linear regression showed that the origin, age, educational background and personality test results were the four factors affecting the mental health of adolescents. Conclusion. 1. The overall level of mental health of adolescents in Nanyang is lower than that of normal people in China. 2. Mental health status of adolescents: the non-left-behind adolescents are superior to the left-behind adolescents; the college graduates are superior to the middle and primary school students; the female adolescents are superior to the male adolescents; Adolescents under the age of 18 are superior to those aged 18 and above. 3. There were significant differences in mental health status among adolescents with different personality types, mainly manifested in the following factors: somatization, compulsion, depression, anxiety, paranoid ideation. Their mental health is relatively poor. 4. The main factors influencing adolescent mental health are origin, age, educational background and personality test results.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：B844.2

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 羅明英;豫南地區(qū)高中生心理健康狀況調(diào)查[D];信陽師范學(xué)院;2012年

，

本文編號：1549137