天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁 > 教育論文 > 學(xué)科教育論文 >

價值中立與價值關(guān)聯(lián)的交織——教育社會學(xué)學(xué)科性質(zhì)的一個內(nèi)在焦慮

發(fā)布時間:2016-09-22 11:24

  本文關(guān)鍵詞:價值中立與價值關(guān)聯(lián)的交織——教育社會學(xué)學(xué)科性質(zhì)的一個內(nèi)在焦慮,由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。


價值中立與價值關(guān)聯(lián)的交織——教育社會學(xué)學(xué)科性質(zhì)的一個內(nèi)在焦慮

作者:程天君   2014年11月10日

[摘 要] 教育社會學(xué)研究解不開價值中立與價值關(guān)聯(lián)的交織,沒有徹底脫離價值判斷的事實判斷,,也沒有徹底脫離事實判斷的價值判斷,純粹的“事實學(xué)科論”與純粹的“規(guī)范學(xué)科論”因而均顯露合理性危機(jī)。從學(xué)科自立的角度看,教育社會學(xué)的學(xué)科性質(zhì)必須是也只能是“事實學(xué)科論”(“事實與規(guī)范兼有學(xué)科論”亦顯露合理性危機(jī)),但這又不可能。由此,教育社會學(xué)學(xué)科性質(zhì)面臨一個內(nèi)在焦慮。價值中立與價值關(guān)聯(lián)的交織產(chǎn)生教育社會學(xué)學(xué)科性質(zhì)之主流取向抉擇上的“一個或所有”式的結(jié)果:要么無所謂主流,要么就是“事實學(xué)科論”。在向著“事實學(xué)科論”目標(biāo)邁進(jìn)的方向與道路上,需要也只能保持“盡量的”價值中立和“最接近的”事實學(xué)科論的態(tài)度。

[關(guān)鍵詞] 教育社會學(xué);學(xué)科性質(zhì);價值中立;價值關(guān)聯(lián)

[作者簡介] 程天君,南京師范大學(xué)教育社會學(xué)研究中心副教授、博士。暇210097

The Interweavement between Value Neutrality and Value Relevance

——An Internal Anxiety in Disciplinary Nature of Sociology of Education

Cheng Tianjun

AbstractThe study of sociology of education can not evade the interweavement between value neutrality and value relevancy, which means there is no the fact-based judgment that completely separated from the value-based judgment,vice versa. As a result, reasonable crises have become visible both in the pure "fact discipline theory" and the pure "normative discipline theory. It is necessary to insist on the "fact discipline theory" in order to keep the academic nature and self-independence of sociology of education (so the reasonable crises of the fact combining normative discipline theoryalso appear), but it is impossible. Therefore, an internal anxiety occurs in the discipline nature of sociology of education. As for the pursuit of disciplinary nature of sociology of education, this interweavement brings about a one or all result, i.e., either no mainstream or just the fact discipline theory. In the process toward the fact discipline theory", we should and only can hold the attitude of the value neutrality as much as possible and the "fact discipline theory" as proximate as possible.

Key wordssociology of education, disciplinary nature, value neutrality, value relevancy

Author: Cheng Tianjun, Ph.D. and associate professor of Center for Sociology of Education, Nanjing Normal University (Nanjing 210097)


  本文關(guān)鍵詞:價值中立與價值關(guān)聯(lián)的交織——教育社會學(xué)學(xué)科性質(zhì)的一個內(nèi)在焦慮,由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。



本文編號:120159

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/xuekejiaoyulunwen/120159.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶5bbb2***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com