本文關(guān)鍵詞：價(jià)值中立與價(jià)值關(guān)聯(lián)的交織——教育社會(huì)學(xué)學(xué)科性質(zhì)的一個(gè)內(nèi)在焦慮，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

價(jià)值中立與價(jià)值關(guān)聯(lián)的交織——教育社會(huì)學(xué)學(xué)科性質(zhì)的一個(gè)內(nèi)在焦慮

作者：程天君 　　2014年11月10日

［摘　要］　教育社會(huì)學(xué)研究解不開(kāi)價(jià)值中立與價(jià)值關(guān)聯(lián)的交織，沒(méi)有徹底脫離價(jià)值判斷的事實(shí)判斷，，也沒(méi)有徹底脫離事實(shí)判斷的價(jià)值判斷，純粹的“事實(shí)學(xué)科論”與純粹的“規(guī)范學(xué)科論”因而均顯露合理性危機(jī)。從學(xué)科自立的角度看，教育社會(huì)學(xué)的學(xué)科性質(zhì)必須是也只能是“事實(shí)學(xué)科論”（“事實(shí)與規(guī)范兼有學(xué)科論”亦顯露合理性危機(jī)），但這又不可能。由此，教育社會(huì)學(xué)學(xué)科性質(zhì)面臨一個(gè)內(nèi)在焦慮。價(jià)值中立與價(jià)值關(guān)聯(lián)的交織產(chǎn)生教育社會(huì)學(xué)學(xué)科性質(zhì)之主流取向抉擇上的“一個(gè)或所有”式的結(jié)果：要么無(wú)所謂主流，要么就是“事實(shí)學(xué)科論”。在向著“事實(shí)學(xué)科論”目標(biāo)邁進(jìn)的方向與道路上，需要也只能保持“盡量的”價(jià)值中立和“最接近的”事實(shí)學(xué)科論的態(tài)度。

［關(guān)鍵詞］　教育社會(huì)學(xué)；學(xué)科性質(zhì)；價(jià)值中立；價(jià)值關(guān)聯(lián)

［作者簡(jiǎn)介］　程天君，南京師范大學(xué)教育社會(huì)學(xué)研究中心副教授、博士�。暇�210097）

The Interweavement between Value Neutrality and Value Relevance

——An Internal Anxiety in Disciplinary Nature of Sociology of Education

Cheng Tianjun

Abstract：The study of sociology of education can not evade the interweavement between value neutrality and value relevancy, which means there is no the fact-based judgment that completely separated from the value-based judgment，vice versa. As a result, reasonable crises have become visible both in the pure "fact discipline theory" and the pure "normative discipline theory”. It is necessary to insist on the "fact discipline theory" in order to keep the academic nature and self-independence of sociology of education (so the reasonable crises of the “fact combining normative discipline theory”also appear), but it is impossible. Therefore, an internal anxiety occurs in the discipline nature of sociology of education. As for the pursuit of disciplinary nature of sociology of education, this interweavement brings about a “one or all” result, i.e., either no mainstream or just the “fact discipline theory”. In the process toward the “fact discipline theory", we should and only can hold the attitude of the value neutrality as much as possible and the "fact discipline theory" as proximate as possible.

Key words：sociology of education, disciplinary nature, value neutrality, value relevancy

Author: Cheng Tianjun, Ph.D. and associate professor of Center for Sociology of Education, Nanjing Normal University (Nanjing 210097)

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：價(jià)值中立與價(jià)值關(guān)聯(lián)的交織——教育社會(huì)學(xué)學(xué)科性質(zhì)的一個(gè)內(nèi)在焦慮，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。