創(chuàng)造性思維測驗(TCI)中文版修訂
[Abstract]:Objective to revise the creative thinking test (TCI),) to investigate the reliability and validity of college students' samples, and to understand the level and structure of college students' creative thinking. Methods the Chinese version of Creative thinking Test (TCI) was formed by translation-back translation and expert evaluation. 400 subjects from three colleges and universities in Henan Province were tested by questionnaire, and 360 valid questionnaires were collected. The survey data mainly used SPSS16.0 software for project analysis, reliability and validity test and demographic difference test. Results the revised test included two items, the total difficulty of the test was 0.43, the retest reliability was 0.763, the standardized Alpha coefficient was 0.896, and the curiosity in Williams creativity tendency test. The correlation coefficients of imagination and total score were 0.588, 0.699 and 0.622 (p0.01), respectively. the correlation coefficient between imaginative and total score was 0.310 (p0.01), but not with other personality factors. The creative thinking of college students is significantly different between gender, major and region. Specifically, the score of female students is higher than that of male students (p0.01), and the score of small and medium-sized cities is higher than that of rural areas (p0.01). The scores of literature and history and agricultural medicine were higher than those of science and technology (p0.01), but there was no significant difference among different age stages. Conclusion the internal consistency reliability, retest reliability, content validity and empirical validity of the revised Chinese version of Creative thinking Test (TCI-C) meet the psychometric requirements and are suitable for Chinese college students. The development level of creative thinking of college students is not balanced, female students are higher than boys, college students from small and medium-sized cities are higher than those from rural areas or municipalities directly under the Central Government, students in literature and history and agricultural medicine are higher than college students in science and technology. Creative thinking is closely related to its groundbreaking personality traits and has nothing to do with other personality traits.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:G647
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 童秀英,沃建中;高中生創(chuàng)造性思維發(fā)展特點的研究[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2002年02期
2 張鋒,馮慶林,何亞云;20年來的西方創(chuàng)造性心理測量研究:方法與問題[J];西北師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年01期
3 張麗華;白學(xué)軍;;創(chuàng)造性思維研究概述[J];教育科學(xué);2006年05期
4 莊壽強;試論特點、屬性的區(qū)別與聯(lián)系及其在科學(xué)研究中的意義[J];自然辯證法研究;1997年11期
5 王顏芳;;大學(xué)生創(chuàng)造性思維現(xiàn)狀研究[J];信陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年05期
6 張軍;青海大學(xué)生創(chuàng)造性思維及其相關(guān)因素研究[J];心理科學(xué);2005年02期
7 胡衛(wèi)平,Philip Adey,申繼亮,林崇德;中英青少年科學(xué)創(chuàng)造力發(fā)展的比較(英文)[J];心理學(xué)報;2004年06期
8 朱曉紅;兒童學(xué)習(xí)動機類型與創(chuàng)造力傾向關(guān)系的研究[J];南京師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2001年06期
9 童秀英,張艷蓮,姜雅東,高玉峰;創(chuàng)造性思維的心理學(xué)研究(綜述)[J];河北職業(yè)技術(shù)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年01期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 王小鳳;大學(xué)生創(chuàng)新思維加工策略的實驗研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2007年
2 李慎秀;大學(xué)生創(chuàng)造性思維水平與詞語聯(lián)想能力關(guān)系的實驗研究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2007年
3 劉晟楠;創(chuàng)造性思維水平高、低大學(xué)生類比推理能力與工作記憶關(guān)系的實驗[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2006年
,本文編號:2484716
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jiaoyulunwen/suzhijiaoyulunwen/2484716.html